Apple's 'Think Different' court clash ends in Swatch's favor
Apple has been handed a defeat in Switzerland's court system, and Swatch will not be penalized for similarities between a "Tick different" smartwatch ad, and Apple's classic "Think Different" slogan.
Swatch and its "Tick Different" marketing from 2017's court filing
In a ruling issued on Tuesday, the Federal Administrative court ruled that Apple's "Think Different" campaign was not well known enough in the country versus Swatch's "Tick Different" to deserve protection. As part of its ruling, as seen by Reuters, the court noted that Apple didn't provide enough documentation that the campaign from the tail-end of the 20th century needed to be protected from Swatch's advertising campaign.
The battle has been a long one. The suit was filed in April of 2017, and Apple was under the gun to prove that at least 50 percent of customers associated "Think Different" with Apple.
Apple advertising agency TBWA\Chiat\Day generated the campaign for Apple in 1997 when the tech giant was struggling. Initially called "crap" by late co-founder Steve Jobs, the now iconic series matched the slogan with black-and-white photos of famous visionaries.
A small selection of Apple's "Think Different" posters
Kicking off the ad blitz was the award-winning "To the crazy ones" TV spot, which featured a voice-over by Richard Dreyfuss. Ad industry insiders consider "Think Different" one of the most influential advertising campaigns in recent history.
Swatch used "Tick different" to promote Bellamy, a quartz wristwatch with built-in Visa NFC payment functionality that beat the Apple Watch to the Chinese market by four months. The company tried to use Bellamy to penetrate into the Chinese mobile payments market in 2015, but ultimately failed to do so.
Swatch CEO Nick Hayek said at the start of the trial that any similarity between the two campaigns is coincidental. Hayek asserts "Tick different" originated Swatch campaign from two decades prior that utilized a "Always different, always new" message.
"Tick different" followed a series of copycat moves that Swatch tried, surrounding Apple's announcement of the Apple Watch in in 2014. In 2015, Swatch won a trademark on the phrase "one more thing," words Jobs would often use to preface surprise announcements at keynote events.
Swatch later said the catchphrase was inspired by the TV show "Columbo" and would be used to market a collection of film noir watches.
The watchmaker also attempted to block Apple's UK trademark application for "iWatch," saying it was too similar to Swatch's "iSwatch" mark. Apple argued that Swatch filed "iSwatch" as a pre-emptive strike against Apple's inevitable smartwatch rollout. The UK Intellectual Property Office ultimately sided with Swatch in 2016, long after Apple decided to market its wearable under the Apple Watch moniker.
Swatch and its "Tick Different" marketing from 2017's court filing
In a ruling issued on Tuesday, the Federal Administrative court ruled that Apple's "Think Different" campaign was not well known enough in the country versus Swatch's "Tick Different" to deserve protection. As part of its ruling, as seen by Reuters, the court noted that Apple didn't provide enough documentation that the campaign from the tail-end of the 20th century needed to be protected from Swatch's advertising campaign.
The battle has been a long one. The suit was filed in April of 2017, and Apple was under the gun to prove that at least 50 percent of customers associated "Think Different" with Apple.
Apple advertising agency TBWA\Chiat\Day generated the campaign for Apple in 1997 when the tech giant was struggling. Initially called "crap" by late co-founder Steve Jobs, the now iconic series matched the slogan with black-and-white photos of famous visionaries.
A small selection of Apple's "Think Different" posters
Kicking off the ad blitz was the award-winning "To the crazy ones" TV spot, which featured a voice-over by Richard Dreyfuss. Ad industry insiders consider "Think Different" one of the most influential advertising campaigns in recent history.
Swatch used "Tick different" to promote Bellamy, a quartz wristwatch with built-in Visa NFC payment functionality that beat the Apple Watch to the Chinese market by four months. The company tried to use Bellamy to penetrate into the Chinese mobile payments market in 2015, but ultimately failed to do so.
Swatch CEO Nick Hayek said at the start of the trial that any similarity between the two campaigns is coincidental. Hayek asserts "Tick different" originated Swatch campaign from two decades prior that utilized a "Always different, always new" message.
"Tick different" followed a series of copycat moves that Swatch tried, surrounding Apple's announcement of the Apple Watch in in 2014. In 2015, Swatch won a trademark on the phrase "one more thing," words Jobs would often use to preface surprise announcements at keynote events.
Swatch later said the catchphrase was inspired by the TV show "Columbo" and would be used to market a collection of film noir watches.
The watchmaker also attempted to block Apple's UK trademark application for "iWatch," saying it was too similar to Swatch's "iSwatch" mark. Apple argued that Swatch filed "iSwatch" as a pre-emptive strike against Apple's inevitable smartwatch rollout. The UK Intellectual Property Office ultimately sided with Swatch in 2016, long after Apple decided to market its wearable under the Apple Watch moniker.
Comments
I didn't know about the 'one more thing' story, that's rich!
I haven't paid any attention to this game Swatch is playing, but they appear to be pretty good at these childish antics. Still grasping for that 15 minutes of fame I guess.
So to answer your question, they've lost a few. Can't really use that "US courts are biased too" angle it seems you were preparing to trot out.
There new slogan is “Think we’re irrelevant.”
Everyone is copying Apples trademarks now it's sad. Watching any tech keynote is filled with cringeworthy Steve Jobs wannabes using Apple phrases.
What Apple CAN do is put these dinosaurs to sleep. Which I think would be smarter. This should encourage Apple to develop better products at competitive pricing. Let these iWannabes BLEED!
U.S. courts hate Apple too. Has nothing to do with country of origin. These are the same scumbags in bed with Googly.