Samsung Galaxy S10 5G now on sale via Verizon, but can only use 5G network in two cities
Samsung's first 5G-compatible smartphone, the Galaxy S10 5G, is finally going on sale in the United States on Verizon, but prospective owners will only be able to use the new connectivity speeds in parts of just two cities for the moment: Chicago and Minneapolis.
Introduced in February alongside the standard Galaxy S10 and two other models, the 5G variant boasts a 6.7-inch Quad HD+ AMOLED screen, an octa-core processor, 8GB of memory, and up to 512GB of storage. Offering a 4,500mAh battery, it includes NFC, Bluetooth 5.0, USB Type-C connections, stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support surround sound support, and both face and fingerprint recognition.
On the back is a quad-camera setup consisting of 12-megapixel telephoto and wide-angle shooters with optical image stabilization, an ultra-wide 16-megapixel sensor, and a 3D depth sensor. On the front is a 10-megapixel selfie camera, and another 3D depth sensor.
The main attraction for the device is its ability to connect to 5G networks, meaning Samsung has made it to market with a 5G-compatible smartphone ahead of Apple, though it is still beaten by Motorola's Moto Z3 and the 5G Moto Mod. Apple is not currently believed to be bringing out a 5G-compatible iPhone until the second half of 2020, with a 2019 release highly unlikely to have 5G connectivity.
For the moment, the Galaxy S10 5G is being sold exclusively from Verizon, at a cost of $1,299.99 for the 256GB model upfront or $54.16 per month for 24 months on Verizon's Device Payment, while the 512GB model is $1,399.99 or $58.33 per month. Customers will also have to subscribe to either Above Unlimited or Beyond Unlimited at $95 or $85 per month respectively to use 5G, and will eventually require an additional $10 per month to access under a 5G Ultra Wideband add-on after a period where it is included in the plan for free expires.
The ability to use the device on 5G is also somewhat limited at this early stage, as Verizon and other carriers work to build out their 5G networks. In the case of Verizon, 5G is currently available only in Chicago and Minneapolis, but has previously advised it aims to deploy the technology in 30 U.S. cities by the end of 2019.
Introduced in February alongside the standard Galaxy S10 and two other models, the 5G variant boasts a 6.7-inch Quad HD+ AMOLED screen, an octa-core processor, 8GB of memory, and up to 512GB of storage. Offering a 4,500mAh battery, it includes NFC, Bluetooth 5.0, USB Type-C connections, stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support surround sound support, and both face and fingerprint recognition.
On the back is a quad-camera setup consisting of 12-megapixel telephoto and wide-angle shooters with optical image stabilization, an ultra-wide 16-megapixel sensor, and a 3D depth sensor. On the front is a 10-megapixel selfie camera, and another 3D depth sensor.
The main attraction for the device is its ability to connect to 5G networks, meaning Samsung has made it to market with a 5G-compatible smartphone ahead of Apple, though it is still beaten by Motorola's Moto Z3 and the 5G Moto Mod. Apple is not currently believed to be bringing out a 5G-compatible iPhone until the second half of 2020, with a 2019 release highly unlikely to have 5G connectivity.
For the moment, the Galaxy S10 5G is being sold exclusively from Verizon, at a cost of $1,299.99 for the 256GB model upfront or $54.16 per month for 24 months on Verizon's Device Payment, while the 512GB model is $1,399.99 or $58.33 per month. Customers will also have to subscribe to either Above Unlimited or Beyond Unlimited at $95 or $85 per month respectively to use 5G, and will eventually require an additional $10 per month to access under a 5G Ultra Wideband add-on after a period where it is included in the plan for free expires.
The ability to use the device on 5G is also somewhat limited at this early stage, as Verizon and other carriers work to build out their 5G networks. In the case of Verizon, 5G is currently available only in Chicago and Minneapolis, but has previously advised it aims to deploy the technology in 30 U.S. cities by the end of 2019.
Comments
Agree with the fast roll out, but this is the wrong modem and wrong type of 5G. the X50 modem(from my understanding) only allows for the millimeter wavelength 5G bands. This gives you the massive speeds, at the cost of terrible range(I think max of 200 yards). The X55 modem I believe supports other bands, and will allow for much greater range(at the cost of some of the speed) and allows for building penetration. I personally wouldn't buy a device until at least the X55 that comes out later this year, which supports both mm wavelength and the sub 6ghz bands, so you can get wider coverage and the ridiculous speeds in certain areas. Basically, the currently available modem does support all 5G, and is already outdated.
Edit: So, looking at Qualcomm's website, the X50 does support sub 6 bands, but not completely. Its has half the supported standards of the X55, doesn't allow 5G/4G spectrum sharing and doesn't integrate the LTE modem. IE, the X50 looks like a half baked product per Qualcomms own website(comparison towards the bottom)
https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon-x50-5g-modem
Another problem with "5G" stories is what I consider to be deliberate obfuscation of the term by the provider companies. There's really (broadly) two types of "5G" -- first is the wide-coverage kind, which is more efficient but not really much faster than advanced LTE. That's the kind almost all "5G" smartphone owners will be getting pretty much all time time.
The second kind os "millimetre wave" 5G -- that's the very fast but extremely limited sort of "5G" where the experience is very much like infrared: you need line-of-sight with no obstructions of any sort, but it is indeed extremely fast. That's the kind consumers are not likely to ever see in wide use due to how easily it is blocked.
This same writer had a terrific article on the reality of sub-6Ghz "5G" versus mmWave "5G" earlier this month: https://appleinsider.com/articles/19/05/01/what-is-5g-and-mmwave-and-when-will-you-be-able-to-realistically-use-it
Bottom line: if you're buying a "5G" phone now or in the near future you are a) paying too much for a phone that will give you very ordinary LTE performance, b) paying too much in the future for "5G" service that might not even be a noticeable speed increase for you compared to advanced LTE, and c) isn't going to be available in most cities for years.
Depends what you mean. For it to reach ubiquity, yes...it's quite some time off. It depends where you live, obviously. I live in the very last Western exurb of Philadelphia. I might as well be in Lancaster County. In that area, my ATT still flips from what is really 4G LTE to 3G frequently (they call it 5GE and 4G, of course). At work (25 miles closer to the city) I have consistent LTE coverage. But it took YEARS to get there. I got an iPhone 5 with LTE capability in 2012 or 13...can't remember which. I'd say it took 5 years to have consistent LTE coverage in the suburbs. And as I said, the exurbs and rural areas still aren't consistent.
Based on what I've read, I'd say you'll see major mass market deployment start in 2020. It will likely take 2-3 years to build out across the country, starting with the densely populated areas first. We're probably 5 years away from the kind of coverage we have now with LTE.
As you state, the benefits of 5G seem to be outside the mobile phone industry. I yet to see any current or near-term uses for 5G that would significantly impact mobile phone users. Even the speed gains are not necessarily going to make a big impact - true 4G LTE speeds are more than adequate. When we made the switch from 3G to 4G, there was already demand/use cases that existed when it rolled out. Based on the current status and lack of actual uses for 5G, I would not expect it to have a significant impact on the average mobile phone user for 3-5 years.
Beyond the tower/antenna issue, latency and speed are affected by the entire network, not just the last leg from t ahe antenna to the device. To achieve the promised specs, the entire network will need to be upgraded. I assume this is happening in the background right now, but I have to wonder how the network capacity will handle the extra traffic. IME, adding bandwidth is kind of like adding lanes to a freeway. At first you have this wide open freeway with everyone cruising at 65MPH. then everyone learns about the wide open freeway and starts to use it and the speeds slow down so it's just like the freeway you had before except with more cars.
Combining this with the small roll out of 5G and the likelihood of the device being both outdated and worn before 5G reaches an acceptable level of deployment and you're left with little reason to purchase this over Samsung's cheaper devices. If you're an iPhone user, it presents no reason to leave the platform.
I'd expect a headphone jack at that price! It'd better be there before I even consider buying one!
/s