now it is IBM and graphics card maker...another piece of the puzzel??
go here
if nothing else...big blue seems to be on a roll...wonder what's being discussed at those intel board meetings these days?
g
if nothing else...big blue seems to be on a roll...wonder what's being discussed at those intel board meetings these days?
g
Comments
Originally posted by onlooker
Freakin kewl! Now, what does this mean for Apple if anything? I guess nothing. But it would be nice to have an awesome GeforceFX Highend 3D card with some serious hardware rendering capability to go along with some new PowerMac's.
<offtopic>AAAAArrrrghhh, not a GeForce FX!! Noisy, expensive, power hungry, ugly, and not too impressing overall. Gimme something different, like the Radeon 9700/9800, or newer generation. </offtopic>
I agree with Programmer, IBM just wishes to milk the opportunity. Not good having an idle production site, or unused capacity!
[B]<offtopic>AAAAArrrrghhh, not a GeForce FX!! Noisy, expensive, power hungry, ugly, and not too impressing overall. Gimme something different, like the Radeon 9700/9800, or newer generation. </offtopic>
You missed my edit by about a second. I was refering to a Nvidia QuadroFX, (1000, 2000 too bad I can't afford it after buying the software I would use it with) but an ATI 9800 Pro would be nice but how long until ATI brings it to us? We'll be two card lineups behind by then, and we'll want something new.
Either this is true, or more than one person fooled me bigtime. Can someone confirm?
This means either boosting the 970 price so that IBM makes more money on the chip than most of the other chips in the plant, or ending 970 production as "not profitable enough".
This is why (if at all possible) Apple must not utterly depend on IBM. IBM doesn't *need* the 970. The "Die, Motorola, Die!" sentiment is completely destructive to Apple.
I don't think it's likely to happen (although there are indications that Fishkill is reaching total capacity usage rather faster than anyone anticipated), but it's certainly something to be aware of.
So if the CPU, graphic chip, even display panel are all from IBM....
....should we call the next PowerMac the IBM workstation?
Originally posted by r-0X#Zapchud
<offtopic>AAAAArrrrghhh, not a GeForce FX!! Noisy, expensive, power hungry, ugly, and not too impressing overall. Gimme something different, like the Radeon 9700/9800, or newer generation. </offtopic>
I agree with Programmer, IBM just wishes to milk the opportunity. Not good having an idle production site, or unused capacity!
Say what you want but the GF4MX was beating the GFTi and the 8500 is a few tests.
IBM is betting ALOT on the PPC 970. Not just for Apple but for Linux PPC. They're competing with low cost Intel based boxes. IBM will have to crank out the chips as fast as they can make them.
Any news that IBM is one step closer to maximizing profitability for Fishkill is great news in my book.
This is so different from Motorola who shunned taking on any new work.
Originally posted by KidRed
Say what you want but the GF4MX was beating the GFTi and the 8500 is a few tests.
I'm sorry, but I am not getting your point here... (Sarcasm/irony maybe?)
IBM is betting ALOT on the PPC 970. Not just for Apple but for Linux PPC. They're competing with low cost Intel based boxes. IBM will have to crank out the chips as fast as they can make them.
Now this is something I've heard a lot lately and I don't understand the reasoning.
First, who the heck is going to buy a Linux PPC? Second, competing on price kills you. Seen AMD's bottom line lately? Small wonder that AMD keeps muttering about getting out of the processor market into something where they can make money...
Nobody (Transmeta, etc.) makes money in the desktop processor market except Intel.
If IBM is really depending on the 970 being successful in the mainstream, we're doomed. There's just no way that the 970 will displace Intel and if that's the way success will be measured for the 970, expect it to be cancelled within 3 years. (Or does no-one remember all the .com's. "We'll own the market within three years or bust." Guess what happened.)
I am desperately hoping that the 970 is a boutique processor. One designed and made on the cheap (but with decent performance) that can be marketed profitably with a million or so sales a year. If that's what IBM is expecting, then the 970 should have a long and fruitful life.
Originally posted by Leonis
Also IBM does make LCDs.....if I am not mistaken
So if the CPU, graphic chip, even display panel are all from IBM....
....should we call the next PowerMac the IBM workstation?
IBM makes practically everything. That's why their stock is so much more stable than other tech stocks...
Originally posted by Tom West
I am desperately hoping that the 970 is a boutique processor. One designed and made on the cheap (but with decent performance) that can be marketed profitably with a million or so sales a year. If that's what IBM is expecting, then the 970 should have a long and fruitful life.
...I hope they aren't planning on selling just a million a year. Apple sells over 3million PCs a year. Apple sold a hundred and something thousand PMs last quarter, which is waaaayyy off the 250,000 or so they were selling per quarter, and with the Dual 867/1.0/1.25s that means 250,000 G4s alone just in PMs, or well over 1m a year, just in PMs, not counting PowerBooks, iMac, eMacs, etc.
I would think Apple will be selling upwards of 5-6 million 970s a year by themselve once their entire line is revamped over he next year or year and a half.
So, if IBM is selling Linux workstations, putting them in blades, all the way up to the big iron when the Power5 arrives, IBM could be selling upwards of 10million 980s/Power5s a year.
So, I hope that IBM is considering and investing in the 970 as more than just a boutique processor.
The article said the IBM plant was in East Fishkill NY.
Who on earth selects the place names!
Sorry for the interruption.
Dobby.