Sundar Pichai minted CEO of Alphabet as Google co-founders step aside

Posted:
in General Discussion
Google CEO Sundar Pichai was on Tuesday tapped to replace Larry Page as CEO of parent company Alphabet, a final step in what has been a graduated withdrawal of responsibilities for Google's co-founders.

Sundar Pichai
Google CEO Sundar Pichai


The changing of the guard was announced in a letter posted to Google's blog and attributed to co-founders Page and Sergey Brin.

"With Alphabet now well-established, and Google and the Other Bets operating effectively as independent companies, it's the natural time to simplify our management structure," the letter reads. "We've never been ones to hold on to management roles when we think there's a better way to run the company. And Alphabet and Google no longer need two CEOs and a President."

The shift puts Pichai in control of Alphabet's substantial holdings, including Google and offshoots like self-driving car startup Waymo, experimental drone company Wing, life sciences research firm Verily and biotech company Calico. He will also oversee Alphabet's investment subsidiaries CapitalG and GV.

Alphabet started life in 2015 when Google splintered its ballooning business into separate entities. Page slid into a role as chief executive of the umbrella company, leaving Pichai the helm at Google.

Page and Brin will remain "actively involved" as board members and retain a significant portion of company shares, meaning their majority voting power will remain undiluted.

Pichai penned a short letter to thank Page and Brin, as well as outline his vision of Alphabet's coming years.

"I want to be clear that this transition won't affect the Alphabet structure or the work we do day to day," he said. "I will continue to be very focused on Google and the deep work we're doing to push the boundaries of computing and build a more helpful Google for everyone. At the same time, I'm excited about Alphabet and its long term focus on tackling big challenges through technology."
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 32
    Alphabet, Go-ogle, and all the derivatives are just one big shell game, thus, I refer to them as Goophabet. Even more appropriate now. 
    lkruppphilboogiewatto_cobracy_starkmandysamoriacornchipjony0
  • Reply 2 of 32
    thttht Posts: 5,441member
    So, this is basically a null change? What did Brin and Page do with Alphabet? Did they have regular meetings with the executives of Alphabet companies and determine their strategies? Budget decisions? Is Pichai going to axe the other Alphabet companies which have been taking some of Google’s billions in profits and setting it on fire?
    watto_cobrarandominternetperson
  • Reply 3 of 32
    Congratulations to Sundar Pichai!

    He certainly has presided over a tremendous amount of wealth creation!
    Carnage9secondkox2
  • Reply 4 of 32
    yojimbo007yojimbo007 Posts: 1,165member
    Now Larry can go do all the kitesurfing he wants ;) See ya out there ...
  • Reply 5 of 32
    It also represents that "Alphabet Inc." was nothing more than a PR stunt to give the appearance of Google having diversified interests. The reality of course is that the company had a number of hobbies which didn't eventuate into sustainable businesses.
    randominternetpersoncornchip
  • Reply 6 of 32
    flydogflydog Posts: 1,123member
    It also represents that "Alphabet Inc." was nothing more than a PR stunt to give the appearance of Google having diversified interests. The reality of course is that the company had a number of hobbies which didn't eventuate into sustainable businesses.
    All tech companies engage in R&D that may or may not turn into a real product or a "sustainable business."  That doesn't make those endeavors "PR stunts."


  • Reply 7 of 32
    flydogflydog Posts: 1,123member

    tht said:
    So, this is basically a null change? What did Brin and Page do with Alphabet? Did they have regular meetings with the executives of Alphabet companies and determine their strategies? Budget decisions? Is Pichai going to axe the other Alphabet companies which have been taking some of Google’s billions in profits and setting it on fire?
    Are you really expecting Pichal or someone from Google's board of directors to chime in and answer your questions? 
  • Reply 8 of 32
    "Google CEO Sundar Pichai was on Tuesday tapped to replace Larry Page as CEO of parent company Alphabet..."
    Whenever I hear about a person being "tapped", I picture someone sticking a spigot in them to drain them of their sap.
    edited December 2019
  • Reply 9 of 32
    one step more separate from the billions they made off of advertising illegal activities, spam, scams, malware, violence, hate and sexualised child targeted content; while using that money to demonetise whole industries, destroying jobs and value en masse globally; and then use a free drip of thieved content and average aggregated products made to replace those industries to addict more than a billion people worldwide to willingly allow their every move and communication to be harvested and sold to the highest bidder from the same unscrupulous advertisers who still peddle scams, spam and malware.

    exact contribution to the betterment of humanity? couple of hobby companies that have resulted in a hand sonar for changing songs on one phone.

    those two are literally the worst scumbags on earth, actually they were trained by the worst scumbag on earth, eric schmidt.

    they should have every cent stripped from them and given to charities that help abused children, and victims of hate crimes, scams and frauds.
    dysamorialkrupptmaycornchip
  • Reply 10 of 32
    dysamoriadysamoria Posts: 3,430member
    Oh, so they’re removing themselves from liability for what Google does, or whatever it is found to be doing that is unethical or illegal in coming years...? They’re more fully retiring to their life of absolute luxury and 1% status...? What DOES this mean? Anything?
    ArpLcy_starkmancornchip9secondkox2
  • Reply 11 of 32
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    Any reason @gatorguy hasn’t chimed in on this while expounding how great this is for humanity?
  • Reply 12 of 32
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,212member
    lkrupp said:
    Any reason @gatorguy hasn’t chimed in on this while expounding how great this is for humanity?
    Not particularly. You guys are doing just fine, even dealing with the race bias well. Otherwise not much of anything changes at the moment, and it's not at all clear if anything will. The founders appear to be happy to enjoy their money and involve themselves in new interests and ventures. Sounds pretty nice to me.

    Imagine the ride, only twenty years to arrive where they are now and still in their 40's with a lifetime ahead of them. Cool stuff....
    muthuk_vanalingamcornchiplkruppCarnage
  • Reply 13 of 32
    Congratulations to Sundar Pichai!

    He certainly has presided over a tremendous amount of wealth creation!
    Considering he’s only worked at Google since 2004, he has really risen in the ranks fast.

    Also notable that he makes $1.8 million salary, versus say Satya Nadella, Microsoft CEO (who makes  $17.6 million salary).
    edited December 2019 cornchip9secondkox2
  • Reply 14 of 32
    flydog said:
    It also represents that "Alphabet Inc." was nothing more than a PR stunt to give the appearance of Google having diversified interests. The reality of course is that the company had a number of hobbies which didn't eventuate into sustainable businesses.
    All tech companies engage in R&D that may or may not turn into a real product or a "sustainable business."  That doesn't make those endeavors "PR stunts."


    You really don't get it?  Creating an entity called "Alphabet" (ticker: GOOG) and making Google a subsidiary with its own leadership was the PR stunt.  I actually don't think it was intended as just a PR exercise, but now that the leadership of Google is the leadership of Alphabet it's a distinction without a difference.  I wouldn't be completely shocked if they change the name of Alphabet at some point back to Google.
  • Reply 15 of 32
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,212member
    Congratulations to Sundar Pichai!

    He certainly has presided over a tremendous amount of wealth creation!
    Considering he’s only worked at Google since 2004, he has really risen in the ranks fast.

    Also notable that he makes $1.8 million salary, versus say Satya Nadella, Microsoft CEO (who makes  $17.6 million salary).
    About the same time as Google's IPO, and only about five years after Google first became a service albeit a very small one and associated more with Stanford. 

    Fun Fact:  Messrs. Brin and Page tried to sell the fledgling Google to Excite in 1998 for $1Million. They got turned down. Tried again for 750K. Still got turned down. 
    edited December 2019 muthuk_vanalingamrandominternetpersonSpamSandwichanantksundaram
  • Reply 16 of 32
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,278member
    flydog said:
    It also represents that "Alphabet Inc." was nothing more than a PR stunt to give the appearance of Google having diversified interests. The reality of course is that the company had a number of hobbies which didn't eventuate into sustainable businesses.
    All tech companies engage in R&D that may or may not turn into a real product or a "sustainable business."  That doesn't make those endeavors "PR stunts."


    You really don't get it?  Creating an entity called "Alphabet" (ticker: GOOG) and making Google a subsidiary with its own leadership was the PR stunt.  I actually don't think it was intended as just a PR exercise, but now that the leadership of Google is the leadership of Alphabet it's a distinction without a difference.  I wouldn't be completely shocked if they change the name of Alphabet at some point back to Google.
    Yeah, I don't think it was a PR stunt -- I think it was a genuine effort that failed. 

    randominternetperson
  • Reply 17 of 32
    thttht Posts: 5,441member
    flydog said:

    tht said:
    So, this is basically a null change? What did Brin and Page do with Alphabet? Did they have regular meetings with the executives of Alphabet companies and determine their strategies? Budget decisions? Is Pichai going to axe the other Alphabet companies which have been taking some of Google’s billions in profits and setting it on fire?
    Are you really expecting Pichal or someone from Google's board of directors to chime in and answer your questions? 
    Obviously not. Even though this is an Apple fan site, there are Google followers who likely know the company and what the executives do. So, I’m hoping one of them do.

    On the surface, the Alphabet reorg was just rearranging the deck chairs or perhaps moving the org boxes but not changing the linkages of the boxes. Google’s revenues covers for all of Alphabet’s other companies’ losses. You basically see that every financial report. Google has a net income of x billions while all of Alphabet’s other companies have combined y hundreds of millions in losses. That’s a one strange power relationship, since it pretty much meant Pichai really controlled Alphabet as all the money and profits was his responsibility. Then, Alphabet looks like a conglomeration of companies. Was curious what is the relationship and independence of those companies, what Brin and Page actually did. It’s been about 4 years and none of those other companies have broken out to be a money maker with its own means.
    cornchip
  • Reply 18 of 32
    flydog said:
    It also represents that "Alphabet Inc." was nothing more than a PR stunt to give the appearance of Google having diversified interests. The reality of course is that the company had a number of hobbies which didn't eventuate into sustainable businesses.
    All tech companies engage in R&D that may or may not turn into a real product or a "sustainable business."  That doesn't make those endeavors "PR stunts."


    You really don't get it?  Creating an entity called "Alphabet" (ticker: GOOG) and making Google a subsidiary with its own leadership was the PR stunt.  I actually don't think it was intended as just a PR exercise, but now that the leadership of Google is the leadership of Alphabet it's a distinction without a difference.  I wouldn't be completely shocked if they change the name of Alphabet at some point back to Google.

    Google is Alphabet and Alphabet is Google, so that would make sense. 
  • Reply 19 of 32
    gatorguy said:
    lkrupp said:
    Any reason @gatorguy hasn’t chimed in on this while expounding how great this is for humanity?
    Not particularly. You guys are doing just fine, even dealing with the race bias well. Otherwise not much of anything changes at the moment, and it's not at all clear if anything will. The founders appear to be happy to enjoy their money and involve themselves in new interests and ventures. Sounds pretty nice to me.

    Imagine the ride, only twenty years to arrive where they are now and still in their 40's with a lifetime ahead of them. Cool stuff....
    What race bias?  You're the first one to even mention race.
  • Reply 20 of 32
    Congratulations to Sundar Pichai!

    He certainly has presided over a tremendous amount of wealth creation!
    Considering he’s only worked at Google since 2004, he has really risen in the ranks fast.

    Also notable that he makes $1.8 million salary, versus say Satya Nadella, Microsoft CEO (who makes  $17.6 million salary).
    Considering that the company was only six years old at that point (and went public only in 2004), that's not a bad tenure. For comparison, MSFT was founded in 1975. The stock was ~$500 when Pichai took over in 2015, it's ~$1300 now. Not bad.

Sign In or Register to comment.