Facebook says it has 'no choice' but to comply with Apple privacy feature

Posted:
in General Discussion
Facebook is continuing its campaign against a planned Apple privacy feature in 2021, but told businesses in an email that it has "no choice" but to comply with the iOS 14 change.

Credit: Facebook
Credit: Facebook


The feature in question makes a type of advertiser tracking explicitly opt in for users. Facebook has launched a full campaign against the feature, including full-page newspaper ads claiming that it could hurt small- and medium-sized businesses.

In an email sent to Facebook business users seen by iMore, the social media giant continued that campaign, stating that the opt-in prompt would have "hard-hitting implications across targeting, optimization, and measuring campaign effectiveness for businesses that advertise on mobile devices and across the web."

"Apple's changes will benefit them, while hurting the industry and the ability for businesses of all sizes to market themselves efficiently and grow through personalized advertising," Facebook continued. "We believe that personalized ads and user privacy can coexist."

While Facebook says it disagrees with the privacy feature, it told business users that it has "no choice" but to adopt the prompt. It added that if it doesn't comply, it could risk removal from the App Store.

In the coming weeks, Facebook says it will offer more guidance and advice to help businesses prepare for the coming change. If users do opt out of advertiser tracking, Facebook said, it could result in "potentially reduced ad effectiveness and limitations on measurement."

Previously, Facebook estimated that the feature could see advertising revenue drop by as much as 60%.

Initially planned for a launch in iOS 14, Apple delayed implementation of the anti-tracking prompt until 2021 to give businesses and advertisers more time to prepare for the feature.

Although some businesses reliant on advertising -- including Facebook -- have rallied against the feature, some privacy groups and organizations have praised Apple for its implementation.

Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, launched a campaign thanking Apple for protecting privacy. Digital civil rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation praised Apple for implementing the feature and called Facebook's campaign against it "laughable."

A report from December also indicated that there is some internal disagreement about the anti-Apple campaign within Facebook. Some employees reportedly believe that Facebook's attacks are unjustified and could backfire on the social media giant.

The anti-tracking transparency feature is slated for release in early 2021, though an exact date isn't currently clear.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 36
    I had stopped using Facebook over their privacy policy. Now that I have a choice, maybe I’ll start using it again. Probably not, though. 
    edited January 2021 Beatsplastico23d_2docno42Dogpersonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 36
    This is not about choice. It is about control. Facebook wants to control the ads you see. Apple wants to control the apps you use.
    elijahg
  • Reply 3 of 36
    I had stopped using Facebook over their privacy policy. Now that I have a choice, maybe I’ll start using it again. Probably not, though. 
    They've kept using you, though; which at its core is what fb is complaining about right now, that they will be forced to ask for permission rather than just straight up collect data about people without people having a say about it.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 36
    kestralkestral Posts: 308member
    They do have a choice:
    1. Make an app
    2. Don't make an app
    mjtomlinbluefire1Beatsdocno42pujones1watto_cobradarelrex
  • Reply 5 of 36
    darelrexdarelrex Posts: 138member
    Zuckerberg: "Apple's changes will benefit them, while hurting the industry and the ..."

    Apple's changes will benefit them? How, exactly, will it benefit them? Oh, by bringing in more users, when people gravitate toward the platform that lets them choose not to be tracked? Nice admission there, Zuck.
    Beatsplastico23llamaroundaboutnowmattinozd_2wg45678docno42mknelsonEsquireCats
  • Reply 6 of 36
    mjtomlinmjtomlin Posts: 2,673member
    This is not about choice. It is about control. Facebook wants to control the ads you see. Apple wants to control the apps you use.

    Yeah, not so much. Apple doesn't want to control what apps people use, they want to control what developers can and can't do on their platform. And there are several reasons for that...

    1. Device security
    2. User privacy
    3. Platform advancement/stability
    4. User experience

    As a user, I am free to download Apple's Developer tools and write ANY app I want and run it on my devices and I am free to distribute that code to anyone else I want and they can compile it and run it on their own devices. All Apple "controls" is my ability to upload that app and distribute it via the App Store.
    WgkruegerpulseimagesGabyBeatsGG1d_2wg45678KTRdocno42pujones1
  • Reply 7 of 36
    mjtomlinmjtomlin Posts: 2,673member

    kestral said:
    They do have a choice:
    1. Make an app
    2. Don't make an app

    Exactly. What's ironic is that Facebook refuses to write an app for macOS because they want those users to use the web portal. Yet, on iOS it's the exact opposite. They can get rid of the Facebook app. It's not like FB users will no longer want to access their FB accounts. It's dead simple to create an icon on the Home Screen to take them directly to the Facebook website.
    edited January 2021 watto_cobraDetnator
  • Reply 8 of 36
    Rayz2016Rayz2016 Posts: 6,957member
    Can’t find my teeny tiny violin …
    plastico23zeus423TRAGwg45678pairof9docno42pujones1Dogpersonrob55cornchip
  • Reply 9 of 36
    BeatsBeats Posts: 3,073member
    Basically:
    We have "no choice" but to be honest with our users.

    What a crybaby.

    qwerty52zeus423docno42Dogpersonrob55StrangeDaysEsquireCatswatto_cobraDetnator
  • Reply 10 of 36
    qwerty52qwerty52 Posts: 367member
    Well done Apple!  It is only you this days who is trying to protect us: the users! Thanks!
    edited January 2021 zeus423ionicleDogpersonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 11 of 36
    BeatsBeats Posts: 3,073member
    Rayz2016 said:
    Can’t find my teeny tiny violin …
    Found it:


    zeus423pairof9cornchipwatto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 36
    geekmeegeekmee Posts: 629member
    Facebook has already made a choice.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 36
    zeus423zeus423 Posts: 242member
    I haven't used Facebag and don't plan on it. When it first came out, I tried to make an account I could use with the classes I teach. I signed up as "Mr. Brown" and my account was disabled for using a "fake name". So I never bothered with it. Yet I'm sure the people I've seen on it who are named PimpDaddy69 are totally legit.
    StrangeDayscornchipwatto_cobra
  • Reply 14 of 36
    BeatsBeats Posts: 3,073member
    zeus423 said:
    I haven't used Facebag and don't plan on it. When it first came out, I tried to make an account I could use with the classes I teach. I signed up as "Mr. Brown" and my account was disabled for using a "fake name". So I never bothered with it. Yet I'm sure the people I've seen on it who are named PimpDaddy69 are totally legit.

    Actually Facebook is great at making people use their own identity and keeping people real. I don't think they allow PimpDaddy69 names reminiscent of 1998 Yahoo Messenger.

    What bothers me about Facebook is the invasiveness and how they won't tolerate anything that goes against their political views.
    wg45678docno42watto_cobra
  • Reply 15 of 36
    DAalsethDAalseth Posts: 2,783member
    zeus423 said:
    I haven't used Facebag and don't plan on it. When it first came out, I tried to make an account I could use with the classes I teach. I signed up as "Mr. Brown" and my account was disabled for using a "fake name". So I never bothered with it. Yet I'm sure the people I've seen on it who are named PimpDaddy69 are totally legit.
    I had to laugh at this. Yes it blocked you for Mr. Brown, but I created an account with the name Me N. Actor and used it for a couple of years. Their systems of checking for fake names were, and presumably still are, beyond inept. 
    wg45678StrangeDayscornchipwatto_cobra
  • Reply 16 of 36
    amar99amar99 Posts: 181member
    For just about the first time, Facebook can't do whatever reckless thing it wants to. Must feel a bit uncomfortable, aye Zuck?
    Beatswatto_cobra
  • Reply 17 of 36
    Deleted my account in 2019, FB has become a bit disgusting
    Beatswatto_cobra
  • Reply 18 of 36
    KTRKTR Posts: 280member
    This is not about choice. It is about control. Facebook wants to control the ads you see. Apple wants to control the apps you use.
    I think its a matter of security?  What do you think?
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 19 of 36
    Ah, the truth sometimes zucks. 
    edited January 2021 GG1Beatswatto_cobra
  • Reply 20 of 36
    bshankbshank Posts: 255member
    Those gosh darned things called rules
    edited January 2021 watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.