First look at App Store human review station on display in Epic v. Apple

Posted:
in General Discussion edited May 2021
Documents submitted as evidence in the Epic Games v. Apple trial have revealed more details about the App Store review process, including an image of a human review station.

Credit: Apple
Credit: Apple


Trystan Kosmynka, a senior director of Apple's App Review team, took the stand again Friday to testify about Apple's review process. In addition to his testimony, several internal documents were also submitted as evidence. One the images in Kosmynka's demonstratives show off an human app review station, which includes a slew of Apple devices, game controllers, and other peripherals.

Among the devices are an iMac, MacBook Pro, a pair of iPhone models, a few iPads, and an Apple TV.

The documents also reveal some statistics about Apple's App Review process. Between 2017 and 2019, for example, there was a 33% to 36% rejection rate for apps. The documents also reveal that about 4.8 million to 5 million apps are submitted each year.

When asked about the variety of updates from developers, Kosmynka said that "some take hours, some up to a minute." He added that many app submissions are updates.

In 2020, the App Review director said that the rejection rate of apps in 2020 was about 40% -- higher than in past years. He said about 215,000 submissions were denied for privacy violations.

Another set of documents submitted Friday also detail an App Review endeavor codenamed "Columbus," which focused on automating the app review process and making it more efficient.

Those documents revealed some of the top reasons that apps are rejected. For example, in 14% of cases, more information is needed. In about 10% of cases, apps exhibit bugs. The documents also indicate that 60% of app reviews are updates.

Kosmynka also dove into the weeds about the intricacies of Apple's App Review process, including some of the technical details and tools that the Cupertino tech giant uses.

The App Review director's testimony Friday follows a similar time on the witness stand Thursday. During that testimony, Kosmynka revealed that Apple acquired malware detection startup SourceDNA in 2016 and that less than 1% of App Store rejections are appealed.

Kosmynka Demonstratives Epic vs. Apple by Mike Wuerthele on Scribd

(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "https://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })();


Stay on top of all Apple news right from your HomePod. Say, "Hey, Siri, play AppleInsider," and you'll get latest AppleInsider Podcast. Or ask your HomePod mini for "AppleInsider Daily" instead and you'll hear a fast update direct from our news team. And, if you're interested in Apple-centric home automation, say "Hey, Siri, play HomeKit Insider," and you'll be listening to our newest specialized podcast in moments.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 7
    That apple with a bite taken out of it is a nice touch.
    dantheman827BeatsmknelsonFileMakerFellerwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 7
    dantheman827dantheman827 Posts: 118member
    That apple with a bite taken out of it is a nice touch.
    But it's facing the wrong way...
    mknelsonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 7
    dope_ahminedope_ahmine Posts: 253member
    That apple with a bite taken out of it is a nice touch.
    But it's facing the wrong way...
    Not for the people in the online meetings
    😉
    Beatsmknelsonpscooter63FileMakerFellerwatto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 7
    BeatsBeats Posts: 3,073member
    What a killer gaming setup! Too bad Apple doesn’t give a sh** about gaming.
    elijahg
  • Reply 5 of 7
    fastasleepfastasleep Posts: 6,420member
    Beats said:
    What a killer gaming setup! Too bad Apple doesn’t give a sh** about gaming.
    Sure, except for Apple Arcade.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 7
    22july201322july2013 Posts: 3,573member
    That apple with a bite taken out of it is a nice touch.
    But it's facing the wrong way...
    Not for the people in the online meetings
    😉
    That is a neat point. It helps to illustrate that when you are in an online meeting, the image you see is inverted while the image everyone else sees is not. So for example if you opened FaceTime (or any other online meeting software) and you were wearing a T-shirt saying "TIM", your viewers would see "TIM" but when you looked at your own image in FaceTime (which shows up in the lower right corner of the screen) it would say "MIT" because you are seeing a reflection whereas the other people are not.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 7
    williamhwilliamh Posts: 1,034member
    Beats said:
    What a killer gaming setup! Too bad Apple doesn’t give a sh** about gaming.
    That’s why they don’t have a selection of game controllers at the app review workstation. 
    FileMakerFellerwatto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.