Apple partner TSMC to increase chip production prices by up to 20%

Posted:
in General Discussion
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., the company largely responsible for Apple's custom chip needs, is reportedly raising prices of nearly all advanced and processes late this year.

Chip


TSMC recently informed clients of the coming change, which will bring an up to 10% increase in quotes on 7-nanometer and smaller processes and a 20% bump for chips fabricated on 16nm and larger technologies, reports Digitimes (via Tom's Hardware). The change is slated to go into effect for orders set for fulfillment in December.

As noted in the report, nearly half of TSMC's $13.29 billion of revenue in the second quarter of 2021 was driven by orders for chips fabricated on its N5 and N7 nodes. A further 25% of revenue during the period came from N16 and N28 process orders.

Whether the change will prompt Apple to increase hardware pricing for products like iPhone, Apple Silicon Macs and other devices that use chips from TSMC is unclear.

Apple currently relies on TSMC for all A- and M-series system-on-chip production, silicon that ends up in flagship devices. The A14 chip, for example, is produced using TSMC's 5nm node, while a report in December claimed Apple gobbled up output capacity of the chipmaker's 3nm process for future silicon designs.

The tech giant is well positioned to absorb the increased quotes as it maintains consistent consumer pricing. However, the company could bump costs in a bid to protect its margins, which are among the highest in the industry.

Digitimes reports that GlobalFoundries, Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing, Semiconductor Manufacturing International and United Microelectronics have also increased production pricing amid a global rise in demand.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    If Apple raises the price of the 13 Mini it will be even a bigger sales failure. 
  • Reply 2 of 9
    mobirdmobird Posts: 753member
    What happened to the "Apple" who liked to source components amongst multiple suppliers? Talk about having your eggs in one basket...
  • Reply 3 of 9
    xyzzy01xyzzy01 Posts: 134member
    mobird said:
    What happened to the "Apple" who liked to source components amongst multiple suppliers? Talk about having your eggs in one basket...
    There aren't a whole lot of semiconductor manufacturers with similar capabilities to choose from.

    That aside - Apple probably has long term contracts, and don't depend on this. Apple prices their devices for the value they perceive they give customers compared to the competition, not cost - if they could have been 100 USD more, they would have been.

    Apple will raise their prices if they see the competition has done so, but otherwise they will probably stay at the current (high) level.
  • Reply 4 of 9
    KTRKTR Posts: 280member
    I guess that will have to depend on the margins 
  • Reply 5 of 9
    netroxnetrox Posts: 1,421member
    mobird said:
    What happened to the "Apple" who liked to source components amongst multiple suppliers? Talk about having your eggs in one basket...
    TSMC is the only one that actually delivers chips on time and the only one with 5nm down to 2nm already planned. Other fabs cannot get that process.
     


    michelb76watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 9
    mobird said:
    What happened to the "Apple" who liked to source components amongst multiple suppliers? Talk about having your eggs in one basket...
    The question should be: why are countries not building similar fabs on their own soil to prevent relying on one on the other side of the planet?
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 9
    MarvinMarvin Posts: 15,324moderator
    KTR said:
    I guess that will have to depend on the margins 
    Their margins are usually above 30% on all products. I think the iPhone is closer to 40%. Their cheapest iPhone is $399 so $160 margin.

    The chips from TSMC cost under $50 so a 10% increase in cost would be $5. Apple could absorb this cost and would have to if they want to maintain prices like $399 instead of $404 or $409. I suppose they could round to the nearest 50 $449 but they aren't struggling profit-wise and the higher-end units are the most popular and have even more room for absorbing higher costs.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 9
    netroxnetrox Posts: 1,421member
    michelb76 said:
    mobird said:
    What happened to the "Apple" who liked to source components amongst multiple suppliers? Talk about having your eggs in one basket...
    The question should be: why are countries not building similar fabs on their own soil to prevent relying on one on the other side of the planet?
    Manpower. There are billions in China and China has excellent economic incentives. China can literally build fab plants in just a few months while it would take years for the same to happen in USA. To force companies to move back to USA will bring economy to a halt simply because we don't have enough manpower nor have the capacity to deliver products as quick as China does. 




    watto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 9
    netrox said:
    michelb76 said:
    mobird said:
    What happened to the "Apple" who liked to source components amongst multiple suppliers? Talk about having your eggs in one basket...
    The question should be: why are countries not building similar fabs on their own soil to prevent relying on one on the other side of the planet?
    Manpower. There are billions in China and China has excellent economic incentives. China can literally build fab plants in just a few months while it would take years for the same to happen in USA. To force companies to move back to USA will bring economy to a halt simply because we don't have enough manpower nor have the capacity to deliver products as quick as China does. 




    There are a lot of technology and innovations in high-tech. You don't know? It is called soft power. Building fab plants is called hard power(?). Even Intel now cannot match the technology and innovations of TSM. 
    By the way, the main reasons companies like Microsoft are raising prices is because US government have printed trillions of dollars since last year. 
Sign In or Register to comment.