What it took for Apple to win Best Picture at the Oscars with 'CODA'

Posted:
in iPod + iTunes + AppleTV edited March 28
At the Academy Awards on March 27, the Apple TV+ film CODA became the first movie from a streaming service to win Best Picture, while also collecting Best Supporting Actor and Best Adapted Screenplay on the same night. Here's what it took for Apple to win that award, before Netflix or Amazon did.




Apple won its first-ever Academy Award on March 27, when Troy Kotsur of the film CODA won the award for Best Supporting Actor. Less than an hour later Sian Heder, the writer/director of CODA, won a second Apple trophy, for Best Adapted Screenplay. And finally, CODA took the night's biggest honor, for Best Picture, meaning that the film won in all three categories in which it was nominated.

Even more notably, the CODA victory represented the first Best Picture trophy ever presented to a film released by a streaming service. That means Apple beat out Netflix and Amazon Prime Video to that honor, even though both of those services enjoyed head starts of several years.

In fact, despite 27 nominations spread across several films, Netflix won only one award at the ceremony, with Jane Campion taking Best Director for The Power of the Dog.

The Power of the Dog spent most of the awards season as the Best Picture favorite until CODA surged in the closing weeks. This happened even though Netflix had a much larger awards slate, as well as many more nominations.

CODA is the story of a young woman named Ruby (Emilia Jones), an aspiring singer who happens to be the lone hearing member of an otherwise entirely deaf family, that operates a fishing boat in Massachusetts. Written and directed by Sian Heder, who had previously worked on the Apple TV+ original Little America, the film's title referenced both music and the acronym "child of deaf adults."

In terms of both budget and star power, CODA is at a much smaller scale than most movies that compete for Academy Awards, both this year and other years. But as it turned out, it was the Academy's choice.

A prescient prediction

In February of 2017, longtime analyst Gene Munster of Loup Ventures made a bold prediction about Apple.

"We think Apple will win an Oscar in the next five years. That's how long it will take for Apple to scale its original content spend from less than $200m today to $5-7b," Munster wrote in the Loup Ventures research note. The post was dated February 24, 2017, on the eve of that year's Academy Awards.

It was a prediction issued at a time when Apple was still more than two years away from launching Apple TV+ and had not yet even officially announced its move into original content. As it turns out, the prediction was accurate.

At the time of the Munster prediction in 2017, Netflix's only Academy Award nominations had been in the Best Documentary category. Amazon, in fact, earned a Best Picture nominee, 2016's Manchester by the Sea, before Netflix did. Netflix has competed for Oscars more seriously in recent years, usually with multiple Best Picture nominees, but none of them have ever won the big award.

Emilia Jones and Troy Kotsur in
Emilia Jones and Troy Kotsur in "CODA," now streaming on Apple TV+.


Yes, technically it was five years and one month after Munster's prediction, but that's more a matter of the timing of the ceremonies. The prediction was made before the 2017 Oscars and came true at the 2022 edition of the event.

Munster, meanwhile, had also predicted Apple would be spending $5-to-$7 billion annually on original content by 2022. Wells Fargo estimated in January that Apple will spend $8.1 billion on Apple TV+ content in 2022.

How Apple got here is a story of ups, downs, and also some big surprises. A look back at the company's journey to the Oscar stage:

Apple TV+ early beginnings

The first indication that Apple planned a move into the original content game was in 2016. That year's Planet of the Apps, a software-themed game show, was the first Apple original show to debut, followed by Carpool Karaoke: The Series in 2017. Both were available on Apple Music.

In January of 2017, reports were circulating that Apple was "planning to build a significant new business in original television shows and movies." The Munster prediction came the following month.

Executives Jamie Erlicht and Zack Van Amburg were hired in the summer of 2017 to lead Apple's content efforts, while in August, it was predicted that Apple would spend $1 billion on original content in the ensuing 12 months.

During this period, there was also some skepticism aired in the press about Apple's content plans, including the "Expensive NBC" report, which indicated Apple was avoiding content with sex and violence, leading to diminished morale among those working on the effort.

Apple officially announced in March of 2019 that its streaming service would be called Apple TV+.

The first shows on Apple TV+

Between those developments and the launch of Apple TV+ in November of 2019, Apple announced a large slate of projects, starting with the star-studded The Morning Show, and the revival of Steven Spielberg's Amazing Stories. The vast majority of those announced projects were TV shows, rather than movies.

Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon on
Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon on "The Morning Show"


Apple also announced a series of deals with filmmakers, actors, and production companies to produce and license content. Perhaps its most notable deal, in terms of movies, came in November of 2018, when Apple and the acclaimed independent distributor A24 teamed up to jointly produce a series of projects.

By August 2019, Apple's content spend had reportedly reached $6 billion.

Apple TV+ launched on November 1, 2019. The launch slate was dominated by TV series, but the nature documentary The Elephant Queen became Apple TV+'s first original film on that date. The drama Hala became the first Apple TV+ scripted film, releasing in theaters in late November of that year and landing on Apple TV+ in December.

Neither of those films were award contenders.

The 2020 slate on Apple TV+

Apple, in both TV and movies, branched out in 2020, especially once the COVID-19 pandemic upended the theatrical business and gave new energy to streaming movies. Apple acquired the Tom Hanks-starring war drama Greyhound, releasing it to the streaming service in 2020, as well as the Irish animated film Wolfwalkers.

The A24 deal first bore fruit in 2020 with Sofia Coppola's drama On the Rocks and the documentary Boys State.

Apple TV+'s On the Rocks
Apple TV+'s On the Rocks


Apple mounted awards campaigns for several of these films, and it resulted in the company's first two Oscar nominations: Best Sound for Greyhound, and Best Animated Feature for Wolfwalkers. And while Ted Lasso emerged that year as an awards juggernaut on the TV side, neither Apple contender won at the Oscars when they were held in April of 2021.

A winning year

Apple sported an even more robust film slate in 2021. This included another acquired Tom Hanks movie, Finch, the Mahershala Ali-starring sci-fi drama Swan Song, and music documentaries The Velvet Underground and Billie Eilish: The World's a Little Blurry. Eilish ended up winning an the Best Original Song award on March 27 for her eponymous song in the James Bond film No Time to Die -- but it had nothing to do with her Apple movie.

Denzel Washington and Frances McDormand in
Denzel Washington and Frances McDormand in "The Tragedy of Macbeth," now streaming on Apple TV+.


Probably the highest-profile film on Apple's slate in 2021 was another A24 collaboration, The Tragedy of Macbeth. Sporting a Shakespearean pedigree and decorated principals like director Joel Coen and stars Denzel Washington and Frances McDormand, the film earned raves when it premiered in September at the New York Film Festival.

The Tragedy of Macbeth ended up with three Oscar nominations, for Washington's acting and also for Best Production Design and Best Cinematography. Also nominated for three awards was Apple's other successful contender.

The CODA story

CODA, a remake of a 2014 French film called La Famille Belier, premiered in 2021 at the Sundance Film Festival. A winner of several awards at that virtual festival, CODA had its distribution rights acquired by Apple for a reported $25 million, a new Sundance record. Amazon, the trade press reported at the time, was also in the bidding for the film.

Major acquisitions from Sundance aren't usually Oscar contenders, and CODA is the first-ever film that premiered at that festival to win Best Picture. It's a far-from-rare occurrence for films that drew positive reactions at Sundance to flop upon contact with the general public.

But when CODA was released in theaters and on Apple TV+ on August 13, the response was overwhelmingly positive. The film has Rotten Tomatoes scores of 95 percent among critics and 93 percent among audiences. The film was later re-released in some theaters, after its nominations.

Emilia Jones in
Emilia Jones in "CODA," now streaming on Apple TV+.


Once awards season began, CODA was a decided underdog. It didn't feature huge stars or a high budget. It didn't win many awards from regional critics groups, and when Oscar nominations were announced, it only received three, compared to The Power of the Dog with 12, Dune with 10 and West Side Story with seven.

Heder, the director, was not nominated for Best Director, which has traditionally not been a good sign for a film's Best Picture chances.

In the final weeks of awards season, CODA appeared to come from behind. Kotsur won several supporting actor awards, including from the Screen Actors Guild, which also gave the entire cast an award for Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture.

Kotsur also won at the Film Independent Spirit Awards, and once CODA won at the Producers Guild of America awards, conventional wisdom began to shift that the Apple film was now the favorite.

This was indeed the case, as CODA emerged victorious on Oscar night. In addition to the history of a streaming service winning, Kotsur became the first deaf male actor to win an Oscar and just the second deaf actor overall; the first, in 1986, was Marlee Matlin, who played Kotsur's wife in CODA.

How exactly CODA won is a tricky question since the Awards are voted on by the industry, and all of the nearly 10,000 members of the Motion Picture Academy get a Best Picture vote. The consensus seems to have emerged that CODA was the choice because audiences were looking to reward something happy, positive, and watchable.

"On behalf of everyone at Apple, we are so grateful to the Academy for the honors bestowed on CODA' this evening," Zack Van Amburg, Apple's head of Worldwide Video, said in a statement after the wins.

"We join our teams all over the world in celebrating Sian, Troy, the producers, and the entire cast and crew for bringing such a powerful representation of the Deaf community to audiences and breaking so many barriers in the process. It has been so rewarding to share this life-affirming, vibrant story, which reminds us of the power of film to bring the world together."

Apple CEO Tim Cook, who attended the ceremony, tweeted his own congratulations:

Team CODA created a profoundly beautiful movie, a story of hope and heart that celebrates our differences. Congratulations to the producers, @SianHeder, @TroyKotsur, @MarleeMatlin, @EmiliaJonesy, @DanielNDurant, @EugenioDerbez, and all involved in these historic wins! #CODAfilm pic.twitter.com/s9ebnPaYl1

-- Tim Cook (@tim_cook)

Much more to come

The big wins for CODA came just over two years after Apple TV+ launched, and came only in Apple's second year of seriously competing for Oscars. Apple's approach of having money to spend, making bold and selective choices with that money, and also taking advantage of luck, has succeeded where none of its competitors have.

Apple has a good chance to return to the Oscars a year after the big win. Martin Scorsese's Killers of the Flower Moon, should it arrive on time, is a likely contender, as is Ridley Scott's Napoleon. Apple made another big Sundance buy in 2022, the comedy/drama Cha Cha Real Smooth, and its other big film this year is Emancipation, which stars Will Smith.

That actor, of course, made headlines at the 2022 Oscars for his slap of presenter Chris Rock, and should Emancipation gain nominations next year, expect Smith's potential return to the Oscars to serve as one of the awards season's major storylines. Of course, it's also possible that Apple's next big Oscar contender will be something small that's not on anyone's radar at present.

Despite absolutely botching predictions of an Apple-branded television set for the better part of a decade, Gene Munster was dead-on about Apple winning an Oscar in five years. And Apple has been vindicated in its decision to spend billions on original content, having beaten Hollywood -- and its streaming competitors -- at their own game.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 17
    lmasantilmasanti Posts: 162member
    Another ‘first’ for CODA that you did not mention is that it is the first movie that went to all cinemas with the ‘subtitles’ burned in!

    This is a movie about deaf people. Shouldn't they be able to right to ‘hear’ it everywhere?
    williamlondonFileMakerFeller
  • Reply 2 of 17
    As expected, accolades for Apple as being the "First Streaming Service to Win the Beat Picture Oscar" are rolling in. Instead the focus should be on those that contributed artistically and technically to the film. Apple merely had deep pockets that allowed them to buy the distribution rights to the movie (beating out Amazon). This is not Apple's award.
    In this article, CODA is referred to as "Original Content" multiple times. Technically that is a true statement because CODA is not available to view on other outlets. But the term "original content" is misleading because it implies that Apple developed the material. They did not.
    I enjoyed this movie, and I enjoy other entertainment that Apple offers on its service. But Apple's role in this situation was akin to buying an escort to accompany them to the Prom in order to be voted Prom Royalty.
    I will gladly acknowledge Apple, or any other company, that financially supports a project from its inception, hires a casting director, cinematographer, screenplay writer, etc., and truly nurtures the project from beginning to end. This is not what Apple did regarding CODA.
    OferDetnatorFileMakerFellercrowleyrundhvidscstrrf
  • Reply 3 of 17
    Content matters
    FileMakerFeller
  • Reply 4 of 17
    OferOfer Posts: 147unconfirmed, member
    jospkelly said:
    As expected, accolades for Apple as being the "First Streaming Service to Win the Beat Picture Oscar" are rolling in. Instead the focus should be on those that contributed artistically and technically to the film. Apple merely had deep pockets that allowed them to buy the distribution rights to the movie (beating out Amazon). This is not Apple's award.
    In this article, CODA is referred to as "Original Content" multiple times. Technically that is a true statement because CODA is not available to view on other outlets. But the term "original content" is misleading because it implies that Apple developed the material. They did not.
    I enjoyed this movie, and I enjoy other entertainment that Apple offers on its service. But Apple's role in this situation was akin to buying an escort to accompany them to the Prom in order to be voted Prom Royalty.
    I will gladly acknowledge Apple, or any other company, that financially supports a project from its inception, hires a casting director, cinematographer, screenplay writer, etc., and truly nurtures the project from beginning to end. This is not what Apple did regarding CODA.
    Well-said! Give credit where credit is due.
    FileMakerFellerscstrrf
  • Reply 5 of 17
    retrogustoretrogusto Posts: 1,008member
    I imagine that elsewhere there is less emphasis on Apple’s perceived victory, but to be fair, this is a website about Apple. They didn’t write produce or develop the picture, but they identified it as great programming and were willing to reward the filmmakers accordingly. Given that it was based on a French film from 2014, the credit probably deserves to be distributed even more widely than usual. But for Apple, it does constitute a victory of sorts, to be sure, from a business perspective at least. 
    FileMakerFellerscstrrf
  • Reply 6 of 17
    DetnatorDetnator Posts: 287member
    jospkelly said:
    As expected, accolades for Apple as being the "First Streaming Service to Win the Beat Picture Oscar" are rolling in. Instead the focus should be on those that contributed artistically and technically to the film. Apple merely had deep pockets that allowed them to buy the distribution rights to the movie (beating out Amazon). This is not Apple's award.
    In this article, CODA is referred to as "Original Content" multiple times. Technically that is a true statement because CODA is not available to view on other outlets. But the term "original content" is misleading because it implies that Apple developed the material. They did not.
    I enjoyed this movie, and I enjoy other entertainment that Apple offers on its service. But Apple's role in this situation was akin to buying an escort to accompany them to the Prom in order to be voted Prom Royalty.
    I will gladly acknowledge Apple, or any other company, that financially supports a project from its inception, hires a casting director, cinematographer, screenplay writer, etc., and truly nurtures the project from beginning to end. This is not what Apple did regarding CODA.
    Have to agree with this.  It seems strange to think Apple had anything to do with winning these awards. 

    Apple gets some credit for making a bold choice in purchasing decisions. No doubt they chose it because it’s a bit left field, brings to light some of the challenges of a differently abled minority, etc., which are topics close to Apple’s virtual heart.  That’s worth something. Or in the above analogy they get credit for choosing the right escort to hire for the prom. But yeah, I think that’s about as far as it goes. Apple didn’t win any of this in any shape or form. 

    I appreciate that Tim Cook has the decency and grace to praise the cast, crew, etc. and make no mention of Apple in his tweet, and  Zack van Amburg only mentions Apple as who he’s representing in expressing his and their praise for the creatives. At least these guys seem to have their heads on straight about it, more or less. 
    FileMakerFellercrowleyrundhvidscstrrf
  • Reply 7 of 17
    hexclockhexclock Posts: 1,076member
    It’s a nice win, but unfortunately the film isn’t accessible to nearly as many people as it probably deserves. 
  • Reply 8 of 17
    The Will Smith and Chris Rock incident seems to have stolen all the attention away from the winners.
    netrox
  • Reply 9 of 17
    entropysentropys Posts: 3,708member
    I thought the only thing that happened at this years’ Oscars is Will Smith went the biff.  Did something else happen?
  • Reply 10 of 17
    entropysentropys Posts: 3,708member
    I’m also trying to get over how a basic imitation of a French film is “original”.


  • Reply 11 of 17
    Now the truly interesting question: What was more expensive? Buying the movie (after it has been produced without any Apple influence) or paying for the Oscar's campaign to make this movie a contender for 'Best Picture'. (Yes it's a good movie worthy of the award, but we all know without spending lot's of money just for the 'award' you won't truly stand a chance at the Oscars.)
  • Reply 12 of 17
    crowleycrowley Posts: 10,453member
    entropys said:
    I’m also trying to get over how a basic imitation of a French film is “original”.
    It won Best Adapted Screenplay, so the Academy Awards seem well aware, it's just Apple's studio name that seems at odds.  Still, better than Apple Magic Films or some other self-regarding silliness.
  • Reply 13 of 17
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 2,838member
    Seems that movie theaters now exist solely to deliver comic book movies. Network tv exists for football and reality tv shows. Everything else is on streaming.
    lkrupp
  • Reply 14 of 17
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,176member
    hexclock said:
    It’s a nice win, but unfortunately the film isn’t accessible to nearly as many people as it probably deserves. 
    Really? Not accessible? You mean someone can’t plop down $5 to watch CODA and then cancel the subscription if they want to? Last time I checked Apple TV+ was still $4.99/mo.
    edited March 29 randominternetpersonscstrrf
  • Reply 15 of 17
    Kudos to Gene Munster.  That was a bold prediction 5 years ago and he nailed it perfectly.  Give an analyst his due when he gets one right.

    As to why CODA won, it's almost certainly because of the way the voting was set up. Voters must rank the 10 nominees from 1 to 10 and every film gets between 10 and 1 points, respectively. It is likely that CODA won not because it got the most first place votes, but because it was a top 3 movie on the vast majority of ballots. From a straight up "greatness" perspective, CODA likely was few people's top choice; it's a well done, nice film with the extra "degree of 
    difficulty" due to the mostly deaf cast (and crew?), but it didn't blow anyone away in terms of directing, cinematography, art design, musical score, etc. But it was a movie that voters could feel good about voting for (because they like the movie and it wasn't a superhero film). This isn't to take anything away from the award. It won because it got the votes (and was up against a lot of gloomy competition). Personally, I thought it very good.

    I agree with everyone else though, it's hardly an Apple production. They film was in the can by the time they got involved. However, the estimated/reported $10 million they spent (somehow) on the Oscar campaign was all theirs.
  • Reply 16 of 17
    hexclockhexclock Posts: 1,076member
    lkrupp said:
    hexclock said:
    It’s a nice win, but unfortunately the film isn’t accessible to nearly as many people as it probably deserves. 
    Really? Not accessible? You mean someone can’t plop down $5 to watch CODA and then cancel the subscription if they want to? Last time I checked Apple TV+ was still $4.99/mo.
    I don’t have Netflix, so all that content is inaccessible to me. Most people won’t start a new subscription to see one movie. I certainly would not. 
  • Reply 17 of 17
    crowleycrowley Posts: 10,453member
    hexclock said:
    lkrupp said:
    hexclock said:
    It’s a nice win, but unfortunately the film isn’t accessible to nearly as many people as it probably deserves. 
    Really? Not accessible? You mean someone can’t plop down $5 to watch CODA and then cancel the subscription if they want to? Last time I checked Apple TV+ was still $4.99/mo.
    I don’t have Netflix, so all that content is inaccessible to me. Most people won’t start a new subscription to see one movie. I certainly would not. 
    Some people choose to not go to the cinema either, you wouldn't say that theatrical releases are inaccessible to them.

    Apple TV is pretty broadly accessible, if people don't want to try it out then that's their prerogative.
Sign In or Register to comment.