Tesla beat Apple to an AirPower-like multi-device charger
While its CEO is a little busy elsewhere, Tesla has rolled out a wireless charger shaped vaguely like its Cybertruck, with the same goal -- but not design ethos -- as Apple's AirPower.
Forget naming cars so that the range spells out the word "S3XY," now Tesla's marketing department has released the "Wireless Charging Platform." Perhaps they knew they might as well use a description instead of a name because everyone's calling it AirPower.
Previously, in 2017, Apple announced AirPower, a then-forthcoming wireless charger where you could just put your iPhone, Apple Watch, and AirPods down on its surface, and they'd charge. Except they wouldn't, or the AirPower would burn up, or something, and eventually Apple threw up its hands and abandoned the idea.
Now, Tesla has begun taking pre-orders for its version, the Wireless Charging Platform, which will begin shipping in February 2023.
"Inspired by the angular design and metallic styling of Cybertruck, our Wireless Charging Platform provides 15W of fast charging power per device for up to three devices simultaneously," says Tesla. "Its sleek design is composed of an aluminum housing, premium alcantara surface and a detachable magnetic stand that allows you to lay the charger flat or at an angle for better viewing."
It is specifically for "Qi capable devices such as phones or earbuds," which means it won't charge the Apple Watch. While in certain -- and rare -- conditions you can get a Qi charger to work on an Apple Watch, it's pretty clear given Tesla's marketing materials that they did not crack that nut.
So it's not quite the complete solution that AirPower tried to be. That means you're still going to have to have at least two chargers, which makes the $300 of Tesla's option seem even more costly.
Tesla is not the first firm to produce an multi-device charger -- but it is the first to have one that you can put devices down anywhere on the surface. Mophie released what it called the 3-in-1 wireless charging pad in 2019, and at launch it cost $140 - including a built-in stand for an Apple Watch charger.
That's still available at a steeply discounted $60 from Amazon.
Similarly, in 2020 there was the Satechi Trio Wireless Charger which includes an Apple Watch stand. That retails for $120 from Amazon.
Read on AppleInsider
Forget naming cars so that the range spells out the word "S3XY," now Tesla's marketing department has released the "Wireless Charging Platform." Perhaps they knew they might as well use a description instead of a name because everyone's calling it AirPower.
Previously, in 2017, Apple announced AirPower, a then-forthcoming wireless charger where you could just put your iPhone, Apple Watch, and AirPods down on its surface, and they'd charge. Except they wouldn't, or the AirPower would burn up, or something, and eventually Apple threw up its hands and abandoned the idea.
Now, Tesla has begun taking pre-orders for its version, the Wireless Charging Platform, which will begin shipping in February 2023.
"Inspired by the angular design and metallic styling of Cybertruck, our Wireless Charging Platform provides 15W of fast charging power per device for up to three devices simultaneously," says Tesla. "Its sleek design is composed of an aluminum housing, premium alcantara surface and a detachable magnetic stand that allows you to lay the charger flat or at an angle for better viewing."
It is specifically for "Qi capable devices such as phones or earbuds," which means it won't charge the Apple Watch. While in certain -- and rare -- conditions you can get a Qi charger to work on an Apple Watch, it's pretty clear given Tesla's marketing materials that they did not crack that nut.
So it's not quite the complete solution that AirPower tried to be. That means you're still going to have to have at least two chargers, which makes the $300 of Tesla's option seem even more costly.
Tesla is not the first firm to produce an multi-device charger -- but it is the first to have one that you can put devices down anywhere on the surface. Mophie released what it called the 3-in-1 wireless charging pad in 2019, and at launch it cost $140 - including a built-in stand for an Apple Watch charger.
That's still available at a steeply discounted $60 from Amazon.
Similarly, in 2020 there was the Satechi Trio Wireless Charger which includes an Apple Watch stand. That retails for $120 from Amazon.
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
Body copy: Tesla didn't really beat Apple
https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-placed-bottom-consumer-reports-reliability-rankings/
Toyota has nothing to fear from Tesla, and notably, Tesla is massively late with its Cybertruck, trucks of which are the bread and butter of profitability for the Big Three in the U.S, plus Toyota, and Nissan.
In truth, tsla continues to be massively overvalued.
I didn’t know that watching devices sitting on a wireless charger was something that attracted a viewing audience. Do people have viewing parties and gather ‘round the charger slab with bowls of popcorn and cheesy nachos, perhaps even some adult beverages, to see … what? Is there some sort of animation or music coming from the slab that wasn’t mentioned? Perhaps a little smoke? I suppose you could place a green banana on the cybercharger and watch it turn yellow … and then brown .. and then dry up and shrivel. Now that would be something to see!
I think I’ll save myself nearly $300 and just cut a similarly sized board, slap a fresh coat of paint on it, and invite all of my friends and family over for a “watching paint dry viewing party.” Paint color to be selected by a vote of all those who RSVP on the invitation.
Just goes to show that we don’t need no NFL football on Apple TV+ when we have so many other ways to amuse ourselves.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_Design
While I know of many issues with Tesla and EVs, to simply say they’re “junk” does nothing to paint Tesla in a poor light but a lot to paint your communication as such.
Finally, I can find issues with any vehicle… and I do mean any in this sense. For example, a Bugatti Veyron is effectively “junk” if you need something off road, but it doesn’t mean it’s junk in other contexts. From what I’ve read, Tesla has a long tradition of great vehicle safety reports and I know that is something many buyers look at over the quality of upholstery or color options, which Tesla does lack considerably to more established automakers.
I do have several people in my family with Teslas (4 at last count, and only one cared to get AutoPilot.
Not in the article I read. It certainly doesn’t do the Watch.
As for expensive, $140 seems about right for devices such as this. They’re all overpriced, IMO. I’m not sure why Tesla is making a charging mat, but whatever, as long as it works as advertised.
I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again- there are many similarities between Tesla and Apple. Both tend to be rather polarizing in terms of consumer opinion with a diehard fan base that will bite your head off if you dare speak ill of their profit and readily believe “you’re holding it wrong” and call you a hater for disagreeing. They also both have a lot of people of are convinced they are evil and overpriced junk.
In general I like Apple products but find plenty of faults with them and Apple as a company. The same goes for Tesla. If I go on an Apple forum and complain about faults I get labeled as a hater, and if I go on a Tesla forum and complain about faults I get labeled as a hater there, too. I guess the truth hurts sometimes no matter where you are.
I've tired to be very kind by walking you to a more reasonable way of expressing your feelings about Tesla, but if you can't see how your ridiculous your comments have been up to this point you're either trolling or you're simply not mentally capable or making a reasonably intelligent comment on the matter.
2) You haven't held Tesla responsible for anything, but more to the point, you haven't made a single reasonable argument as to why everything about Tesla is "junk", as you put it.
3) On top of all that you've made bald face lies about no Tesla owner liking their car, and yet you can't seem to understand why that is a problematic logical fallacy.
4) You say I claim to be "tired" when the sentence I wrote is "I've tired to be very kind...". Are you really unable to see that it's a simple typo for the word tried? 🤦♂️