Mac mini with M2 review: More power for less money

Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware edited February 2023
The second Apple Silicon Mac mini has arrived two years after the line first migrated, and with the M2 processor, it remains the best computer for switchers, and for the computer as appliance crowd.

The 2023 Mac mini M2
The 2023 Mac mini M2


Updated February 15 with Geekbench 6 scores

The usual refrain for the Mac mini is that it's a simple and good value way to get people into the Mac ecosystem, and this is no different. In an unobtrusive block of aluminum, Apple packs in more than enough computing power to keep people productive, in an overall inexpensive package.

These qualities makes the Mac mini a fantastic tool for switchers, coders who need Windows and Mac hardware, and those looking for a quick computing upgrade for their desktop.

In 2023, Apple has gone with an entry-level M2 and a higher-end model with the M2 Pro. This is a similar strategy that it had with the Intel Mac mini, and been rumored for some time.

The two tiers serve very different markets. In this review, we'll be examining the $599 configuration with 8GB RAM, 256GB storage, and the M2 processor. We'll be looking at the M2 Pro in a future review.

Mac mini is very much a known quantity in the Apple catalog, and it has steadfastly remained the same externally between generations. You know deep down that the new one's more powerful than the last, and it will do what you want it to do.

M2 Mac mini - Design

The appearance of the Mac mini is, as usual, bold and impressive while also clearly communicating Apple's decade-long Mac design language from afar. It's a square-ish flat aluminum enclosure with an Apple logo on the top, rounded corners, and a sleek appearance that keeps all of the ports and other needed bits to the rear.

Mac mini and its power cable
Mac mini and its power cable


Practically everything after this point will be things brought up in earlier Mac mini discussions, because they've not changed. For a start, the measurements of the Mac mini are officially 7.75 inches long and wide, and 1.41 inches tall.

These numbers are different from the previous generation, but only because Apple's rounding to two decimal places, not one. This is evident in the metric measurements of 19.7cm or 19.70cm wide and long, and the height of 3.6cm for the M1 replaced by 3.58cm for the M2.

We've already tried it in mounts, docks, and so forth that rely on the form-factor, and it still fits fine in everything.

The weight is also identical to last time at 2.6 pounds, though in metric, the 1.2kg of the M1 is now 1.18kg in the M2 model.

To a point, and pardon the pun, Apple has boxed itself into a corner with the design. It's more than ideal for what the system offers, and Apple has few reasons to actually change how it looks.

Many rumors pointed to the Mac mini having a major design overhaul, including a plexiglass-like cover and a generally thinner appearance. We obviously didn't get that.

Apple could have used the opportunity to introduce a big change to its appearance, like it did for the 24-inch iMac and the MacBook Air. Instead, it offered the same well-worn design with no changes.

This isn't a bad thing. Accessories remain the same, and it's easy to market.

M2 Mac mini - From M1 to M2

The main draw of the new Mac mini is the M2 chip used inside of it. While the previous generation was part of the first wave of Apple Silicon devices using M1, the Mac mini had to wait a bit before it gained the M2.

M2 Mac mini and M2 Pro Mac mini vs M1 Mac mini -- Specifications

SpecificationsM1 Mac mini (2020)M2 Mac mini (2023)M2 Pro Mac mini (2023)
Starting price$699
Best M1 Mac mini prices
$599
Best M2 Mac mini prices
$1,299
Buy now
Dimensions (inches)1.4 x 7.7 x 7.71.41 x 7.75 x 7.751.41 x 7.75 x 7.75
Weight (pounds)2.62.62.8
ProcessorApple M1 8-core CPUApple M2 8-core CPUApple M2 Pro 10-core CPU,
Apple M2 Pro 12-core CPU
Graphics8-core GPU10-core GPU16-core GPU,
19-core GPU
RAM8GB, 16GB8GB, 16GB, 24GB16GB, 32GB
Networking802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 wireless networking
IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac compatible,
Bluetooth 5.0,
Gigabit Ethernet, 10Gig upgradable
802.11ax Wi-Fi 6E wireless networking
IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac compatible,
Bluetooth 5.3,
Gigabit Ethernet, 10Gig upgradable
802.11ax Wi-Fi 6E wireless networking
IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac compatible,
Bluetooth 5.3,
Gigabit Ethernet, 10Gig upgradable
Storage256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB512GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB
Display SupportMaximum of 2:
One 6K 60Hz over Thunderbolt
and one 4K 60Hz over HDMI
Maximum of 2:
One 6K 60Hz over Thunderbolt
and one 5K 60Hz over Thunderbolt
or 4K 60Hz over HDMI
Maximum of 3:
Two 6K 60Hz over Thunderbolt
and one 4K over HDMI.
Up to 8K resolution or 240Hz possible over HDMI
PortsHDMI,
Two Thunderbolt 4,
Two USB-A,
Gigabit Ethernet,
3.5mm headphone
HDMI,
Two Thunderbolt 4,
Two USB-A,
Gigabit Ethernet,
3.5mm headphone
HDMI,
Four Thunderbolt 4,
Two USB-A,
Gigabit Ethernet,
3.5mm headphone
The M2 Mac mini CPU we're reviewing here is an 8-core version, consisting of four high-performance cores along with four energy-efficient cores. This is similar to the M1's CPU, except the M2 runs at a higher clock speed of 3.49GHz.

It's supported by a GPU with ten cores, up from the eight-core GPU of its predecessor. Meanwhile, the 16-core Neural Engine has been boosted from up to 11 trillion calculations per second to 15.8 trillion.

The M2 also benefits from memory boosts, with the unified memory now operating at 100GB/s, up from the 68.25GB/s of memory bandwidth seen in the M1. There's even an extra memory option, with the M2 adding a 24GB capacity option alongside the previous 8GB and 16GB,

Geekbench 5 benchmarks, single-core
Geekbench 5 benchmarks, single-core


M2 also benefits from a full Media Engine, borrowing the ProRes and ProRes RAW hardware-accelerated video encoding and decoding capabilities from the M1 Pro. While the M1 has hardware-accelerated encoding and decoding of H.264 and HEVC, the M2 adds in the feature for ProRes and ProRes RAW.

This all adds up into a chip that is obviously more powerful than the last chip Apple used in a Mac mini. According to Apple, the M2's CPU is 18% faster than the M1, while the GPU provides up to 35% faster performance.

In terms of benchmarking, Geekbench 5 improved from 1688 to 1951 when comparing the M1 Mac mini to the base M2 Mac mini on the single core test. That is a roughly 15% improvement and close to what Apple had promised.

Geekbench 5 benchmarks, multi-core
Geekbench 5 benchmarks, multi-core


On the multi-core, the M2 improved from 7361 to 8827, or a near 18% growth.

We tested the machine again on the newly-released Geekbench 6 and saw a single-core score of 2654 and a multi-core score of 9932.

Graphically, the new Mac mini touts more power thanks to two additional GPU cores on the base model. Our base unit not has a 10-core GPU which ran circles around the last-gen unit.

M2 Mac mini Geekbench 5 Metal Compute test
M2 Mac mini Geekbench 5 Metal Compute test


On Geekbench 5's Compute benchmark running on Metal, it went from 22871 on the 2020 M1 Mac mini with the 8-core GPU to 31135 on the 2023 M2 Mac mini with the 10-core GPU.

On the Geekbench 6 variant of the test, it scored 45187 on the graphics test.

In the Blackmagic Disk Speed Test, we only managed to see 1608 MB/s for write speeds, and 1493 MB/s for read speeds on our base unit. This is notably less than the 2600ish MB/s on the M1 Mac mini.

Let's talk about that SSD speed in the $599 model. It is worth noting, because it exists -- but that's about it for this particular model and who it's intended for.

Yes, it's a cost-saving measure for Apple. Yes, it's slower than the 256GB M1 model.

No, it doesn't matter much in day-to-day use. Your average surfer, Excel enjoyer, Word purveyor, 1080p video editor, TikTok creator, social media user won't see any difference at all.

If you time a macOS startup with the M2 Mac mini versus the M2 Pro mini, it'll be seconds slower. Where it might -- might -- noticeably come into play is higher resolution video editing. And, depending on the external drive, it may make a difference in file transfers to it.

But, the screaming and moaning about it that also happened with the M2 MacBook Air is ridiculous. If you want the best speed possible in a Mac mini, you know what you need to buy -- and it isn't the $599 configuration.

M2 Mac mini - Connectivity

We have already established that the Mac mini's externals haven't really changed that much. Not only does this relate to its general physical appearance, but also to the selection of ports you'll find around the back.

Visually unchanged from the last generation, the M2 Mac mini includes two 40Gb/s Thunderbolt 4 ports that can also handle USB 4, USB 3.1 Gen 2, DisplayPort, and older technologies using USB-C adapters. The M2 Pro version has four of these ports, which makes having half the number a little disconcerting for the M2 variant.

There is also a pair of USB-A ports to the right-hand side, as well as an HDMI port with multi-channel audio, and a Gigabit Ethernet connection that can be upgraded to a 10Gb version.

Mac mini M2 ports
Ports on the rear of the M2 Mac mini


Below the USB-A ports is the 3.5mm headphone jack, which this time has been upgraded to a version with support for high-impedance headphones. It's an upgrade that has slowly made its way through the Apple ecosystem, and one that audiophiles will love.

Audio is also handled by the built-in speaker. As it has always been, don't rely on it for more than anything other than system sounds.

Like the M1 Mac mini, you can hook up a maximum of two displays to the base M2 Mac mini, with a 5K 60Hz screen supported over Thunderbolt simultaneously with a 4K 60Hz screen over HDMI.

The highest resolution you can get is 6K at 60Hz over Thunderbolt, but only for one display.

That video playback can include HDR in HLG, HDR10, and Dolby Vision varieties, as well as HEVC, H.264, and ProRes. Audio playback includes AAC and MP3 support, Apple Lossless, FLAC, Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, and Dolby Atmos.

For wireless connectivity, Apple has updated the Mac mini to support Wi-Fi 6E, enabling it to work with higher Wi-FI speeds -- provided its on a network that supports the standard.

Bluetooth has also unexpectedly been updated, with Bluetooth 5.3 now supported.

M2 Mac mini - Configuration options and no upgrades

The base M2 Mac mini here, is $599, which gets you 8GB of unified memory, 256GB of SSD storage, and Gigabit Ethernet.

If you want to boost the memory, it's $200 to get to 16GB, and another $200 again for 24GB. We didn't run into any issues with 8GB for most productivity tasks, surfing, and other casual use. We do recommend the upgrade to 16GB at purchase, though, for no other reason that future-proofing -- but more on that in a bit.

The 256GB SSD internal may not be enough for many power users, but you could go for 512GB for $200, 1TB for $200 more, and 2TB for an additional $400 again.

The last upgradable bit is the Gigabit Ethernet, with 10Gig available for $100. This is either future-proofing, or for enterprise. Either way, you already know if you need it, and it's cheaper than Thunderbolt alternatives.

As is usually the case for Apple's configuration pricing, it is extremely high cost for what you get. You won't get much usable free space when you're on 256GB, so expect to rely on other kinds of storage.

Since it's unified memory, upgrades here are useful since there's an effect on other elements of the M2 beyond the CPU due to the pooling of memory capacity between elements. Yes, it seems like a lot of money to go from 8GB to 16GB, but that memory boost will also impact the GPU, which will help its graphical capability too, making it a worthwhile update.




AppleInsider generally advises to prioritize memory upgrades over storage, and to rely on alternate ways to expand storage capacity for the cost. Thunderbolt is fast enough for adding external SSD storage, and total overkill for hard drives, even if you've got a lot of new, fast ones in a 8-bay RAID.

Going for the upgrade from 8GB to 16GB of memory and going to 1TB doubles the cost of the M2 Mac mini to $1,199, which isn't the greatest way to configure the Mac mini if price is a factor.

Due to the nature of everything being located on the M2 chip, you simply can't add in extra memory or storage. It's not user upgradable in that way at all, and it's been a policy for Apple's consumer-oriented Mac lineup for a few years now.

The most agreeable solution to the configuration problem would probably be to go to 16GB of memory and 512GB of storage, which gives a usable amount of local storage and the performance upgrade for a total cost of $999 including the Mac mini.

That extra $200 that could've gone towards the 1TB storage upgrade can easily cover the cost of a higher-capacity external storage drive connected to Thunderbolt, or could go towards some network-attached storage.

Apple could eventually make the Mac mini user-upgradeable again, again down the line, but we're not expecting it. But for the moment, you either have to swallow the upgrade fees or accept workarounds.

A familiar but excellent deal

The whole point of the Mac mini is to provide consumers with an affordable Mac. Specifically, a Mac that they can buy without breaking the bank, and get going with minimal effort.

The 2023 M2 Mac mini
The 2023 M2 Mac mini in box


At $599, the base M2 Mac mini certainly meets that goal, especially since it's $100 cheaper than the M1 release. For educators and students, they can pick it up for an even better $499.

That's an entire Mac that, under education pricing, is half the cost of an iPhone 14 Pro.

We're all for squeezing every last dime out of a capital investment in computers. That said, if you're interested in performance on the cheap, the only reason to stick with an Intel Mac mini at this point is Boot Camp.

For everybody else, if you've got an Intel Mac mini of any sort, it's probably time to upgrade. The $599 configuration is faster than any Intel mac mini, and not by a little.

Nearly all the important software is Apple Silicon-native now, and non-native Mac software is faster under Rosetta than it ever was on an Intel mini.

Apple certainly hasn't made any external design changes to the Mac mini, and it may be a while before it actually implements any of the rumored alterations. But even so, the unchanged exterior is still stylish and practical enough.

Bar none, the M2 Mac mini is the best balance of computing power to cost for the computer-as-appliance crowd that you can get for the money. That's something that certainly hasn't changed.

M2 Mac mini Pros

  • M2 chip with Media Engine
  • Improved CPU and GPU performance
  • New lower cost
  • Familiar stylish and compact design

M2 Mac mini Cons

  • Limited Thunderbolt and USB-A ports
  • High memory and storage configuration costs
  • Lack of user upgradeability
Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Where to buy Apple's M2 Mac mini

Apple's M2 Mac mini is on sale at Apple Authorized Reseller Adorama, with exclusive promo code APINSIDER knocking $50 to $100 off select configurations.

The latest offers are at your fingertips in our 2023 Mac mini Price Guide, which is updated throughout the day. Compare prices across numerous Apple resellers and scan the top Mac mini deals to select the best configuration, such as the base model in this M2 Mac mini review, to fit your needs.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 19
    canukstormcanukstorm Posts: 2,699member
    Rhythmage said:
    I can barely afford something that costs 300$ now a days. I just gotta use the apple gear i got for music making. No more new computers for me for about 10 years. 
    10 years is a long time
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 19
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,280member
    Anxiously awaiting my 6GB/512.GB configuration,
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 19
    multimediamultimedia Posts: 1,035member
    Ordered the $1299 plus $99 3 year AppleCare M2 Pro 16GB Unified Memory 512GB SSD model and still got the $100 discount. So it’s like getting AppleCare FREE. Thanks Adorama!!
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 19
    DAalsethDAalseth Posts: 2,783member
    The Mini is so good that I wouldn’t be surprised if it doesn’t start cannablizing sales of other macs. Why get a bottom end studio when a loaded Mini has similar performance for less. Why get an iMac when a Mini  plus a monitor costs less and is just as capable. 

    The Mini might be TOO good. 
    pulseimagesFileMakerFellerAlex1N
  • Reply 5 of 19
    thttht Posts: 5,437member
    DAalseth said:
    The Mini is so good that I wouldn’t be surprised if it doesn’t start cannablizing sales of other macs. Why get a bottom end studio when a loaded Mini has similar performance for less. Why get an iMac when a Mini  plus a monitor costs less and is just as capable. 

    The Mini might be TOO good. 
    Nobody is worried about it because nobody buys desktops anymore.  :D  Couldn’t believe desktops actually declined in sales during the pandemic, but they did. 

    A Mm with M2, 24 GB RAM, 512 GB storage and a couple of OWC miniStacks is currently my replacement plan for when my 2013 iMac 27 dies. Monitor still undecided. 
    DAalsethwatto_cobraAlex1N
  • Reply 6 of 19
    cgWerkscgWerks Posts: 2,952member
    Sounds nice, but hoping to hear about the Pro variant, and how it might compare to the base Studio. Are people getting those to test, yet? I’m guessing it might be kind of close (well, at least until the M2 Studio).

    DAalseth said:
    The Mini is so good that I wouldn’t be surprised if it doesn’t start cannablizing sales of other macs. Why get a bottom end studio when a loaded Mini has similar performance for less. Why get an iMac when a Mini  plus a monitor costs less and is just as capable. 

    The Mini might be TOO good. 
    Heh, yeah. This is the good (for consumers) aspect of ASi. For the average user, GPU ability aside, nearly any of Apple’s machines are now perfectly fine. Pick a MBA or mini and you’re good to go.
    watto_cobraFileMakerFellerAlex1N
  • Reply 7 of 19
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,861administrator
    cgWerks said:
    Sounds nice, but hoping to hear about the Pro variant, and how it might compare to the base Studio. Are people getting those to test, yet? I’m guessing it might be kind of close (well, at least until the M2 Studio).

    It is close to the M1 Max, but not the M1 Ultra. More on this next week.
    DAalsethwatto_cobracgWerksroundaboutnowFileMakerFellerAlex1N
  • Reply 8 of 19
    cgWerkscgWerks Posts: 2,952member
    Mike Wuerthele said:
    It is close to the M1 Max, but not the M1 Ultra. More on this next week.
    Thanks Mike. I’ll be looking forward to that. My son is chomping at the bit to get a computer, and we had been considering a base Studio (maybe a tiny bump), or trying to wait for the Studio w/ M2. But, similarly configured, the mini M2 Pro is a bit cheaper if it is close and there aren’t too many downsides. And, the M2 Studio might be longer off (or way longer off if the rumours are true) than he’ll wait.
    FileMakerFellerAlex1N
  • Reply 9 of 19
    The depreciation on the M2Pro mini shouldn't be more than a couple hundred bucks between now and the time when the upgraded Studio is released. Worth taking the chance on the machine you can get today.
    cgWerksh2p
  • Reply 10 of 19
    22july201322july2013 Posts: 3,570member
    But when is the Mac Pro arriving? Could it be next month?
    Alex1N
  • Reply 11 of 19
    cgWerkscgWerks Posts: 2,952member
    The depreciation on the M2Pro mini shouldn't be more than a couple hundred bucks between now and the time when the upgraded Studio is released. Worth taking the chance on the machine you can get today.
    Fair point, especially if the performance/time were money-making gains.

    But, in this case, it’s just going to be his computer for several years until it drops, or he decides to save up for another one (his current ‘butterfly’ MBP is having issues, beside the keyboard, and was too-low-spec’d for what he’s now trying to do… hence the upgrade pressure). We’d be unlikely to try and resell and then buy the Studio M2. Mainly trying to decide if a Studio M1 is worth the couple hundred extra bucks or not (I’m kind of guessing not, unless there is a heat/noise issue w/ the Pro mini M2).
  • Reply 12 of 19
    MarvinMarvin Posts: 15,322moderator
    But when is the Mac Pro arriving? Could it be next month?
    I'd expect some kind of special announcement for it. It's rare they do these in February, they are normally in March/April and it would tie in with other updates like for the iMac and Studio. It's early for a Studio update, March is 12 months since the last one. I don't think it will happen later than WWDC in June because it would be more likely they will complete the M2 lineup before announcing M3 products, the first being the M3 Macbook Air.
    h2p
  • Reply 13 of 19
    cgWerkscgWerks Posts: 2,952member
    Marvin said:
    I'd expect some kind of special announcement for it. It's rare they do these in February, they are normally in March/April and it would tie in with other updates like for the iMac and Studio. It's early for a Studio update, March is 12 months since the last one. I don't think it will happen later than WWDC in June because it would be more likely they will complete the M2 lineup before announcing M3 products, the first being the M3 Macbook Air.
    I thought I read somewhere that the M2 Studio wasn’t expected until 2024 now. I think all the timelines are thrown off. I hope that is wrong.
  • Reply 14 of 19
    "AppleInsider generally advises to prioritize memory upgrades over storage, and to rely on alternate ways to expand storage capacity for the cost."

    That makes sense for a desktop but less so for a laptop.

    A laptop is mobile and it is a pain either 1) to load/unload the internal SSD with the things you may need/won't need or 2) carry around external storage. I sold my MBA M1 256GB originally bought new and replaced it with exactly the same but with 2TB internal SSD, second hand. Now everything is on board, no shuffling or carrying external storage, life is simpler, faster and better. 

    At present the internal SSDs are so fast, and Apple Silicon so memory-efficient, that there is barely any difference in speed between the 8GB & 16GB memory options. If you have $200-$400 to spend, I would spend it on extra storage 512GB/1TB first as it is not only far more convenient but SSD speed is proportional to size - making the marginal speed improvements of going from 8Gb to 16GB look totally insignificant in comparison. 
  • Reply 15 of 19
    cgWerks said:
    I thought I read somewhere that the M2 Studio wasn’t expected until 2024 now. I think all the timelines are thrown off. I hope that is wrong.

    I would expect the Studio to be quietly dropped in a year or so. It was a sticking-plaster solution until the new Mac Pro range appeared. No doubt they will be collected and appreciated by their aficionados, much like the Cube, for years to come. The Studio is a monstrous carbuncle of design that never should have happened. Besides, with a beefed-up Mini Pro and the imminent Mac Pro, there is no commercial space for it in the lineup, at least not beneficial to Apple. Apple would much rather sell you a cheap-to-make top-end Mini or an over-priced, bottom-end Mac Pro. 
    williamlondonh2p
  • Reply 16 of 19
    cgWerkscgWerks Posts: 2,952member
    timmillea said:
    That makes sense for a desktop but less so for a laptop.

    At present the internal SSDs are so fast, and Apple Silicon so memory-efficient, that there is barely any difference in speed between the 8GB & 16GB memory options. If you have $200-$400 to spend, I would spend it on extra storage 512GB/1TB first as it is not only far more convenient but SSD speed is proportional to size - making the marginal speed improvements of going from 8Gb to 16GB look totally insignificant in comparison. 
    For a laptop, for sure, I’d shift more priority towards storage, though I’m not sure I agree on skimping on memory. It depends on what one does with it, I suppose. For desktops, adding external storage unless you absolutely need max speed is just so cheap/easy now, that is why I think they are recommending it (as am I).

    Regarding memory, it is now true that what we used to call ‘virtual memory’ is so fast and part of the OS, that some people might not notice. But, I think there is still quite a speed difference, if that matters. My concern for the average user would be more in terms of ‘wear and tear’ on the SSD. I think the actual RAM is less limited by read/write cycles, though maybe the margin on the SSD is high enough it won’t matter. Something to consider, though.

    timmillea said:
    I would expect the Studio to be quietly dropped in a year or so. It was a sticking-plaster solution until the new Mac Pro range appeared. No doubt they will be collected and appreciated by their aficionados, much like the Cube, for years to come. The Studio is a monstrous carbuncle of design that never should have happened. Besides, with a beefed-up Mini Pro and the imminent Mac Pro, there is no commercial space for it in the lineup, at least not beneficial to Apple. Apple would much rather sell you a cheap-to-make top-end Mini or an over-priced, bottom-end Mac Pro. 
    Some valid points. It’s market position does shrink with a mini Pro, and Mac Pro, though we don’t know yet what the latter will be, or where the pricing will start. That said, the Studio is, for someone like me, the Mac I’ve been waiting for for decades… maybe my whole life. It is reasonably sized, powerful, semi-affordable, and can adequately cool itself for pro workflows.

    There have been very few computers ever produced that meet all those requirements!

    I’d have one already, but it isn’t up to speed (yet) on GPU capabilities. But, I sure hope Apple keeps something available with adequate performance that doesn’t start at $7k or whatever. There is a sizeable pro market that isn’t those super-pros with virtually unlimited budgets. And, given that those of us in that situation could buy a PC for $1500-$2500 that fulfills that role, I really hope Apple keeps something to fill that gap between mini and Mac Pro (or, as in the 2000s, lowers the price of the Pro enough regular people can afford one).
    muthuk_vanalingam
  • Reply 17 of 19
    The M2 Mini having the same form factor is a plus in school and university labs. Since the Mini does not have any Kensington lock anchor points, labs have to depend on third party cage enclosures to secure the Mini. The M2 having the same form factor makes it possible to perform slot-in upgrades to replace older (Intel-based) equipment.
    cgWerks
  • Reply 18 of 19
    It's important to note that 8GB is wholly inadequate for almost everything in modern times unless you want to spend your time closing apps. Im not sure if the benchmarks use more than 8GB but if they don't they're faulty. I have 32GB in my imac and i regularly use > 20GB just browsing around. Once you start swapping all bets are off in terms of performance. 

    I'd think 16GB could be. minimum and that's barely enough.. Because of the high price of 24GB Im wary to even buy the mini. A used 2020 iMac gives me a great display, the ability to upgrade ram and still 3x the performance f my 2015 iMac for < 1/2 the price of a mini and a studio display. 
    Flappo
  • Reply 19 of 19
    FlappoFlappo Posts: 22unconfirmed, member
    I bought the tricked out version 32/2 tb but in hindsight should’ve gone for a studio 

    Then again it supposedly suffers from whine and air noise so maybe not.. ?


    Mac mini
    With the following configuration:
    Apple M2 Pro with 12‑core CPU, 19-core GPU, 16‑core Neural Engine
    32GB unified memory
    2TB SSD storage

    God knows . Tbh I actually prefer the iMac 
Sign In or Register to comment.