Forty years of the Mac, the computer for the rest of us

Posted:
in macOS edited January 24

Forty years before Apple Vision Pro, practically to the day, Apple launched the Macintosh -- and it eventually changed the world.

A vintage original Macintosh computer with a beige casing, featuring a built-in screen displaying the word
The original Macintosh



There wouldn't be an Apple Vision Pro and Apple would not be a trillion-dollar company if it weren't for the Mac that was launched on January 24, 1984. Even though Apple and the whole world has changed in these 40 years, though, there are some surprising similarities between what Apple was and what the Mac made it become.

Starting with how back in the 1980s, there was still a question over what people would use a computer for. There was always the claim that you could do your taxes on them and -- prepare to wince -- that housewives could keep recipes on them.

In the end, the answer to what people would use a computer for was everything. Absolutely everything. Perhaps that's what will happen with Apple Vision Pro too, but 40 years ago, there wasn't remotely the same attention being paid to Apple as there is now.

And partly because of that, partly because the original Macintosh was far from being completely workable, the Mac was not an instant it. Arguably, it was even a flop.

The world's first sight of the Apple Macintosh in 1984
The world's first sight of the Apple Macintosh in 1984



"You've just seen some pictures of Macintosh," said Steve Jobs at the official launch of the Mac on Tuesday, January 24, 1984. "Now I'd like to show you Macintosh in person."

He was speaking on stage at the Flint Center in De Anza College, Cupertino, which would become the venue for many of Apple's most important launches until its closure in 2019. As well as the Mac, it was where the first iMac was revealed, and the Apple Watch.

The Mac he unveiled at the Flint Center back in that January 40 years ago, has the name we all recognize, and a display long-time users might remember, but nothing else.

Its screen was monochrome and at 9 inches smaller than any Mac today. It was only a little bigger than the current iPad mini's 8.3 inches.

The resolution of today's iPad mini, though, reveals just how small the original Mac was in another sense. Where the iPad mini's resolution is 2266 x 1488 pixels, the original Mac's was just 512 x 342 pixels.

Plus where we can now stream Apple Music with Spatial Audio, back then its speaker struggled to play back a voice during Jobs's demo.

Only, if the original Mac looks primitive today, back in 1984 it looked like the future.

"Up until that moment," wrote Steven Levy in his book about the Mac, "when one said a computer screen 'lit up,' some literary licence was required. By the end of the demonstration, I began to understand that these were things a computer should do. There was a better way."





That was a common reaction with the Mac's first users, a kind of delighted surprise that it made sense and that they instinctively, automatically, knew how to use it. Or rather, they knew what it meant to see a folder on screen, or a document, or the trash, but dragging with a mouse took more explaining.

Apple produced a 1980s version of what would soon become known as an Electronic Press Kit (EPK), in order to promote the Mac and give video material for news outlets to use in their coverage.

For a straight, hyped-up and extended ad that was designed to sell the Macintosh, this EPK also managed to reveal the very different outlooks of both Steve Jobs and then-CEO John Sculley.

"We're gambling on our vision," says Jobs in the video. "And we would rather do that than make 'me too' products. Let some other companies do that."

Jobs might have come to regret that later after Windows and then Android copied Apple, but right there in the video was a seed of trouble to come.

"With Macintosh we have put together an extremely well-coordinated, very powerful consumer marketing program to introduce this product," says John Sculley in the videos.

Sculley was sure marketing was the important factor while Jobs was certain that making the Mac the best it could be should be Apple's focus. You can't really fault either of them, since a great product is useless if no one hears about it, and brilliant marketing can only go so far with a dud product.

But this was 1984 and it was in 1985 that Apple and Jobs parted company.

It seemed at the time as if the inventor of the Mac was gone -- except of course he would return. And except that Steve Jobs was far from the creator of the Mac.

Jef Raskin started it all



This is not to say that Jobs was irrelevant in the creation of the Mac, since for example he was responsible for the route it took with both keyboard and mouse.

It was Steve Jobs who mandated that the Mac not have the four cursor keys for moving around a screen, so that users would be forced to use his other mandate -- a mouse.

Consequently, the Mac's planned 62-key keyboard became a 58-key one, and the mouse became an integral part of absolutely everything users did with the computer.

"I couldn't stand the mouse," Apple's Jef Raskin told Owen W. Linzmayer in the book Apple Confidential 2.0. "Jobs gets 100 percent credit for insisting that a mouse be on the Mac."

Raskin was arguably wrong about the mouse, and Raskin is also a far less well-known figure than Jobs, but it was crucial to the Macintosh. He even gave the computer its name, although he intended it to just be a codename while the Mac was in development.

Plus having seen his original basic ideas for the Mac get stretched and pulled and distorted by Jobs, Raskin even worked on the mouse he so disliked. If you've ever wondered why the Mac had a mouse with just a single button on it when Windows ones have three or more, it was down to Raskin.

As with most things on the Mac, the mouse was created because Jobs saw one in use at the Xerox PARC facility in 1979. But Raskin was there first, and actually Raskin was there often, so he'd seen the development of the mouse -- and he wasn't keen.





"They had this three-button mouse and I couldn't keep track of which button was which," he said in a later TV interview. "And so when I came to create the Macintosh project... I realized you could do all that you have to do with a one-button mouse. It took me a while to convince people that was possible."

It's no longer clear just how Raskin came to create the Mac, since he himself would slightly vary the story. It appears most likely, though, that at some point in 1979 he was thinking about the future of Apple and pitched his idea to then-chairman Mike Markkula.

"The projects that were in the works [at the time] were the Apple III and the Lisa. I [told Markkula that] I thought the Apple III didn't have the technical pizazz to take us to the future... and the Lisa was going to be overpriced and too slow. So I proposed a thing which I called Macintosh."

He also proposed that the Macintosh would be released by Christmas 1981, and cost $500. He was wrong by just over two years, and just under $2,000.

What went wrong with Raskin's plan



Jef Raskin was proposing pretty much everything that the Mac ultimately became, particularly in regard to its bitmapped screen that could display images instead of just lines of green or yellow text. There's little question that getting from his plan to the final product would have taken time and money enough that Apple would have to charge more than $500.

But ultimately, the two key reasons for the delay and the price being five times what Raskin planned, were Steve Jobs and John Sculley.

Jobs had been working on the Apple Lisa when he visited Xerox PARC and saw what was being done there. When he returned to Apple and tried to get the Lisa to be more like what Xerox was doing, he was removed from the Lisa team.

Looking around for something else to work on, Jobs decided that the Mac wasn't the unimportant side project he'd thought it was, and he took over.

Ad for the Canon Cat (Source: Archive.org)
Ad for the Canon Cat (Source: Archive.org)



Jobs steadily cut Jef Raskin out of more and more of the Mac design effort. Eventually, Raskin resigned in March 1982 and put his plans to work creating what would become the Canon CAT computer, in 1987.

Launching the Mac



You're unlikely to have heard of the Canon CAT and supremely unlikely to have ever used one -- it was discontinued in 1987, the same year that it was released. Whereas the Mac was launched in 1984 and arguably has never been discontinued.

Certain models of the Mac, in practically all of them, have been discontinued over the last 40 years, but always with new ones replacing them. From the myriad personal computers made in the 1980s, the sole one whose name survives is the Mac.

But it is a little surprising that the Mac took off because, despite its screen and technology that were immediately and obviously superior to other computers of the day, there were problems. Such as it costing so much money -- and such as it not really working.





John Sculley spent $78 million in 1984 prices on marketing the Mac, and Steve Jobs gave the launch it all. Together, they also gave us one of the most famous TV adverts ever made. It aired during the Super Bowl two days before the launch, and Jobs screened it again during his presentation..

Underpowered and over-priced



The Macintosh was truly everything that this ad implied and that Steve Jobs stated in his launch -- but not at first. That original Mac was hampered by coming with 128k of RAM.

So hampered that the Mac Jobs gave his demo on secretly had 512k RAM inside, just to make it work. Buyers would not be able to buy the 512k version, the so-called Fat Mac, until September of 1984.

Even then, they'd have to pay more for it. The Fat Mac cost $3,195 at launch.

Without the Fat Mac, though, users would spend far less time working on the device, and far, far, far more time swapping out floppy discs.

There was no new Mac in 1985, but in 1986, the Macintosh Plus came out -- and it shipped with 1MB of RAM, but could support up to 4MB RAM, as long as you had a long-handled screwdriver and were comfortable cutting a resistor.

From then, the Mac got better and better. It also got worse and worse competition, as first the IBM PC and then countless Windows clones took over.

The Mac had already outlasted many rivals, but it was roundly beaten by Windows PCs that offered a fraction of its benefits, but did so at a fraction of the cost.

Even though Apple kept producing new Macs based on every new processor that Motorola released, its market share kept on shrinking.

Then in 1994, Apple abandoned the Motorola processor line that had been in the Mac since the start. It transitioned the Mac over to PowerPC, and what was really an enormous technical and marketing issue was achieved so well that it was easy to regard the move as simple.

So that was it, PowerPC revitalized the Mac, made it "up to twice as fast" as the then-current Pentium processors. Rather than reversing the Mac's fortunes, though, it was more that PowerPC kept Apple in the game.

That first PowerPC Mac was in March 1994. In December 1996, Apple held an event that was excruciating as then CEO Gil Amelio rambled with excuses about why the company was doing so badly.

He talked for a long time, but then introduced a man who was a much better speaker, would ultimately return Apple to success -- and would soon oust Amelio.

Gil Amelio introduced Steve Jobs. Apple had bought Jobs's NeXT venture, and along with it got Steve Jobs back in what was probably thought to be some small, advisory role.

It was not to be, though. Instead Jobs was back running the show, and Gil Amelio was out in July 1997.

Enter the iMac



In 1997, Apple launched six versions of the desktop Power Macintosh, three PowerBooks, three Newtons (if you include the education eMate 300 version), two Workgroup Servers, and a belated 20th Anniversary Macintosh. After Steve Jobs slashed away at the product lineup to save costs and create some clarity, in 1998 Apple launched two PowerBooks, one server, one Power Macintosh - and the iMac.

"Today, I'm incredibly pleased to introduce iMac, our consumer product," Jobs said at Macworld on May 6, 1998. "iMac comes from the marriage of the excitement of the Internet with the simplicity of Macintosh."



"Even though this is a full-blooded Macintosh," he continued, "we are targeting this for the #1 use consumers tell us they want a computer for, which is to get on the Internet, simply and fast."

Transitions



Now it can be readily seen that it was the iPhone in 2007 that made Apple into the colossal success that it is today, but it was the iMac in 1998 that saved the firm from extinction.

And for a time, Apple just kept making better Macs using the latest PowerPC processors as they came out.

Or it did, until 2005. At WWDC on June 6, 2005, Steve Jobs introduced Mac OS X Tiger -- and then paused.

"Let's talk about transitions," he said after a moment. "The Mac in its history has had two major transitions so far, right?"

"The first one: 68k to PowerPC, and that transition happened about ten years ago in the mid 90s," continued Jobs. "I wasn't there then, but the team did a great job from everything I hear."

What Jobs built us all up to in that speech was how Apple was ditching PowerPC processors and moving to Intel instead.

It was again a move that kept Apple in the game, and it was again a hugely difficult technical and marketing transition to pull off.

Then 15 years later in 2020, Apple transitioned the Mac again. This time, it wasn't just keeping the Mac in the game, it was transforming the game because now Apple was moving to its own custom-designed processors with Apple Silicon.

"Today is going to be a truly historic day for the Mac," said Tim Cook at WWDC that year. "Today we're going to tell you about some really big changes, how we're going to take the Mac to a whole new level."

It took longer to move the whole Mac lineup from Intel to Apple Silicon than it had to move from PowerPC, and it took longer than Apple said it would.

"When we first started working with Apple Silicon, it honestly did feel for us like the laws of physics had changed," John Ternus, Apple's senior vice president of hardware engineering, said to Wired. "All of a sudden, we could build a MacBook Air with no fan with 18 hours of battery life."

The Mac's anniversary is "not a story of nostalgia, or history passing us by," said Greg 'Joz' Joswiak, Apple's senior vice president of worldwide marketing. "The fact we did this for 40 years is unbelievable."

Craig Federighi in the same interview said he believed that the Mac had "been able to absorb and integrate the industry's innovations" over those four decades.

"[The] Mac has taken potential and turned it into intuitive creative tools for the rest of us," he continued. "With seemingly disruptive waves like spatial computing and AI, the Mac will renew itself over and over."

Mac changed everything when it was introduced 40 years ago, and through the years it has done so again and again and again. Today's Mac lineup is the best in the history of the personal computer, and it's built on decades of revolutionary innovation. Happy birthday Mac! pic.twitter.com/px6QII8rX0

-- Tim Cook (@tim_cook)



Some 40 years ago, the Macintosh was a gamble that nearly failed. Yet today there isn't a Mac, there is a range of them and they are so powerful, they are so successful, that the Mac is surely never going away.




Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 17
    canukstormcanukstorm Posts: 2,727member
    The mantle of "computer for the rest of us" has passed on to the iPhone & iPad. The Mac has now graduated to being high-end tool for professional users. 
    designrmattinozwatto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 2 of 17
    entropysentropys Posts: 4,213member
    Can’t believe it has been 39 years since my fa Mac. sooo old. It truly was ground breaking and many a game of Daleks was played on that dinky little screen. paired it up with an Apple LaserWriter.
    watto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 3 of 17
    I still to this day don’t have a fond view on Mac beginnings. It fractured Apple and killed off the Apple II line. That was “the computer for the rest of us”. The II line had a big install base in schools and homes and Apple wanted people to start over? That probably helped out the PC market. I’m even going to dare and say the IIGS was more powerful than the Mac at the time.
    iOS_Guy809secondkox2watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 17
    nubusnubus Posts: 459member
    I still to this day don’t have a fond view on Mac beginnings. It fractured Apple and killed off the Apple II line. 
    Apple couldn't just stop II as it paid all the bills and schools kept buying the computers. It took more than a decade and Apple even sold II boards for the Mac with a CPU.

    At school we had the IIc but one year after summer... Mac Plus (and it had 1 MB RAM). It was a wild time. Load OS, create RAM disk (from 1 MB), swap to another 800K disk, run Excel 1.0 (documents could be on the disk with Excel),... ResEdit, HyperCard,... tools to remember.
    watto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 5 of 17
    lwiolwio Posts: 110member
    I remember working in a computer section of a bank we all had pc’s and terminals. No one touched the Mac but me. I was brought up on them at university. Then a few people came over to watch. I was producing flyers for something and I got them done in no time. In no time I had a couple of converts too, the speed and ease of use was the clinching point. By the time I left there was a few more macs and practically everyone could use them.
    designrwatto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 6 of 17
    bluefire1bluefire1 Posts: 1,304member
    I purchased the first Mac in 1984 for $2495, and it lasted for 36 years. Yes it was underpowered, but what a game changing machine at the time! 
    watto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 7 of 17
    I was just starting up my business. I had an IBM PC that I was using with Lotus 1-2-3, buying my electronics and software from the Byte Shop down the road. Bill Gates could still be seen eating at the nearby McDonalds. Then, one day, the Byte Shop was displaying a brand new Mac! First thing I tried to do with it was to copy a floppy disk. It crashed. I wrote it off as junk not ready for the market. 
  • Reply 8 of 17
    We took the Macintosh Test Drive in 1984. A friend popped in and we showed her this shiny new thing we were so impressed with (we were both into computers). She said “No thanks, I hate computers!”. We said give it a go so reluctantly she did - about an hour later we had to pull her away from it and she was amazed. She was not a tech person in any way so we knew that Apple were onto something.

    We bought one and an ImageWriter for £2,500 in ‘84. Yikes! But as my partner said at the time “This is the future of computing” and we could see it then so clearly. It was incredible and no comparison with anything else at the time. Never looked back.
    watto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 9 of 17
    I always remember the story about raising the pirate flag.
    watto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 10 of 17
    And here’s to 40 more years of innovation in the best computers on the planet. 
    watto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 11 of 17
    danvmdanvm Posts: 1,446member
    And here’s to 40 more years of innovation in the best computers on the planet. 
    It should have said "And here’s to 40 more years of innovation in one of the best computers on the planet."
    9secondkox2
  • Reply 12 of 17
    As I think about today's pricing of Apple Vision Pro at over $3500 I harken back to the first iMac I bought 40 years ago. With an external disk drive and B&W 72  dpi dot matrix printer in Germany I paid over $3,000 (actual - not adjusted for inflation).  Then I made 1/3rd of what I make now. I have no intention of getting the Apple Vision Pro, but you have to admit, Apple fans have paid a lot over the years for a superior experience. The Vision Pro isn't priced out of what's affordable. I'm not sure what my use case would be though. :)

    watto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 17
    danvm said:
    And here’s to 40 more years of innovation in the best computers on the planet. 
    It should have said "And here’s to 40 more years of innovation in one of the best computers on the planet."
    No. It should have read how it read.  the best = Mac. But hey, thanks for playing. 
    edited January 25 watto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 14 of 17
    aldanno said:
    As I think about today's pricing of Apple Vision Pro at over $3500 I harken back to the first iMac I bought 40 years ago. With an external disk drive and B&W 72  dpi dot matrix printer in Germany I paid over $3,000 (actual - not adjusted for inflation).  Then I made 1/3rd of what I make now. I have no intention of getting the Apple Vision Pro, but you have to admit, Apple fans have paid a lot over the years for a superior experience. The Vision Pro isn't priced out of what's affordable. I'm not sure what my use case would be though. :)

    The VP isn’t unaffordable, though it is pricey. It’s that most people may not place that much value on a headset, thereby making a purchase an inequitable decision. 
    watto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 15 of 17
    40 years ago, I waited for the 512k Mac in the fall of 1984 and dove in. Been a Mac user ever since and have had a lot of them. I have no desire to change.
    Because of the Mac I was able to build a Mac 9500 into a video editing machine in 1995, way ahead of the competition. Back then to rent an edit room was around $100 an hour. The room cost $100,000. Now, I could video edit at home. Work at home? No Problem.
    I find it hard to believe that I lived 30 years without one.
    watto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 16 of 17
    I was just starting up my business. I had an IBM PC that I was using with Lotus 1-2-3, buying my electronics and software from the Byte Shop down the road. Bill Gates could still be seen eating at the nearby McDonalds. Then, one day, the Byte Shop was displaying a brand new Mac! First thing I tried to do with it was to copy a floppy disk. It crashed. I wrote it off as junk not ready for the market. 

    Apps like Lotus, WordStar, VisiCalc, and later, PageMaker, are what drove the drove the development of the personal computer, in the same way that health and exercise became the Watch's "killer app."  Whether the Vision Pro catches on will also rely on finding its calling.

    Without DTP (and foundational software like QuickDraw and PostScript), and the creative professionals who supported the Mac niche for years, it probably wouldn't be here today, never mind going mainstream via the iMac and the internet.

    Apple couldn't have pulled off the PPC transition as smoothly as it did without the Davidian 68k emulator and CodeWarrior.

    Hardware retrospectives are nice, but only tell half the story.
    watto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 17 of 17
    danvmdanvm Posts: 1,446member
    danvm said:
    And here’s to 40 more years of innovation in the best computers on the planet. 
    It should have said "And here’s to 40 more years of innovation in one of the best computers on the planet."
    No. It should have read how it read.  the best = Mac. But hey, thanks for playing. 
    No, it was wrong.  For example,

    Do you want to play games?  PC's are better
    Do you want to work with CAD / CAM?  PC's are better
    Do you work with applications that require a large quantity of memory?  PC's are better
    Do you want the best integration with the Microsoft enterprise ecosystem? PC's are better

    These are some examples that I can think of right now.  Like I said before, Macs are one of the best computers on the planet.
Sign In or Register to comment.