Apple Product identifiers have leaked every Mac release through 2026

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware

Apple is developing many new M5 and M6 Mac configurations, and we now have exclusive details on exactly what the company is developing.

Laptop on wooden stand with colorful screen, small plant, blue gaming controller, camera lens, earphones, and notebook on white table against brick wall background.
Apple is developing several new Mac models with variants of the M5 chip.



Nearly all Macs available new in 2025 feature Apple's state-of-the-art M4 chip, with the MacBook Air and Mac Studio receiving the new processing hardware in March 2025. Internally, however, Apple is already working on the two devices' respective replacements, and even the practically forgotten Mac Pro is set to get a major hardware upgrade.

Through our own data and information shared with us, AppleInsider has learned of 15 new Mac models currently in development. People familiar with the matter -- and common sense -- have told us that Apple plans to introduce its M5 chip within a matter of months, and that M6-equipped devices could see some significant changes in late 2026.

Apple's product identifiers follow a pattern, so it is easy to figure out which identifier belongs to which future Mac. The following Macs are expected to be released in the next year, though exact release windows mentioned in this report are based on rumors and Apple's expected schedule.

M5 family expected to launch in late 2025



Apple tends to update the MacBook Pro in the fall of each year, and it looks like 2025 won't be an exception. In late 2024, the MacBook Pro received M4, M4 Pro, and M4 Max configurations. The Mac Mini was made available in an M4 and M4 Pro variant, while the base M4 chip made its way to the iMac.

Open laptop with a glowing screen displaying abstract design, placed on an armrest in a cozy living room setting with a sofa and a wooden table in the background.
The M5 chip is expected to launch with the 2025 MacBook Pro.



Apple's 2025 releases could follow a similar pattern, based on what we were told. People familiar with the matter told us that Apple is testing a Mac with the identifier J873s.

As the current M4 Pro Mac mini is known as the J773s, the J873s is likely an M5 Pro variant of the Mac mini. Though we saw no signs of a base M5 Mac mini, it's unlikely that Apple would introduce only a high-performance M5 Pro model of the device.

There's also an unreleased Mac with the identifier J833ct, which could be an M5-equipped iMac. The 2023 24-inch iMac is known as the J433 within Apple, so an M5 iMac seems plausible, though this is not definitive proof.

Along with those base M5 Macs, Apple is expected to introduce the MacBook Pro with M5, M5 Pro, and M5 Max, which the leaked identifiers line up with. Apple is expected to maintain the current design of the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro for the fall 2025 release, meaning that it is a basic spec upgrade overall.

Previous rumors have suggested there would be no significant changes, and our findings corroborate these claims. Specifically, AppleInsider was told Apple plans to release four distinct hardware configurations:


  • J714c -- MacBook Pro 14-inch with an M5 Max chip

  • J714s -- MacBook Pro 14-inch with an M5 Pro chip

  • J716c -- MacBook Pro 16-inch with an M5 Max chip

  • J716s -- MacBook Pro 16-inch with an M5 Pro chip



The device identifiers mirror Apple's existing M4 MacBook Pro lineup, which is similarly codenamed J614c, J614s, J616c, and J616s, meaning that we likely won't see any significant chassis or design changes. In terms of processing power, however, we could see some major improvements.

One report says the M5 Pro and M5 Max "will use 2.5D packaging" that has "separate CPU and GPU designs," and which will "improve production yields and thermal performance." TSMC's latest chip packaging process, known as "System-in-Integrated-Chips-Molding-Horizontal (SoIC-mH)" puts together different chips into one package, and the M5 Pro may be the first Apple chip with these changes.

The M5 MacBook Pros are expected to launch roughly the same time as the M5 iPad Pro and M5 Apple Vision Pro, according to two previous reports.

Desktop Macs are getting upgrades too



We were also told that a new Mac Pro is in the works, and that it bears the codename J704. Earlier rumors have suggested this particular device will debut before the end of 2025. For reference, the Mac Pro has seen no significant updates since 2023.

Silver rectangular electronic device on a white surface with two vertical and one horizontal slot on the front.
Apple is working on an updated Mac Studio, known under the identifiers J775c and J775d.



The last Intel-based Mac Pro was released in 2019, and it was replaced by an Apple Silicon model in 2023. The current Mac Pro is equipped with the relatively powerful M2 Ultra chip, but it hasn't been updated in two years.

It's also not an ideal option for pro users, given the lack of external GPU support. It's not immediately clear whether the new Mac Pro will use Apple's M3 Ultra or M5 Ultra chip, but a performance upgrade is expected nonetheless.

Apple used to release its desktop Macs during the summer, but this has since changed. While the new Mac Pro is expected to debut in late 2025, an upgrade to the Mac Studio may not arrive until sometime in 2026.

We have learned that two new Mac Studio configurations are in development, known as J775c and J775d. For reference, the current J575 Mac Studio can be configured with an M4 Max or M3 Ultra chip, so it makes sense for Apple to provide two similarly powerful chips for the device's successor in 2026.

The company is said to be experimenting with chips much more powerful than the M3 Ultra, and the Mac Studio would be a logical choice for the new chips.

Still, it remains to be seen exactly what Apple will use for its new-and-improved Mac Studio configurations, which are currently in development.

The MacBook Air could get the M5 in early 2026



After the arrival of the new-and-improved MacBook Pro in late 2025, Apple will likely introduce two MacBook Air models in early 2026. Much like their MacBook Pro counterparts, the new MacBook Airs are expected to maintain the same chassis design as their respective predecessors.

Laptop displaying a dynamic blue and black abstract pattern on screen, set on a desk with blurred background including technology equipment.
The MacBook Air is set to gain Apple's M5 chip in early 2026.
AppleInsider

was told that the new MacBook Air configurations will bear two device identifiers: J813 and J815. This suggests we'll see the same 13-inch and 15-inch sizes currently available, as the existing M4 MacBook Air models are similarly known as J713 and J715.

The M4 MacBook Air received a Center Stage-compatible camera, a carry-over from the M4 MacBook Pro. The M5 MacBook Air may gain similarly minor improvements, but it will otherwise be little more than a spec bump.

Late 2026 should see the debut of a redesigned MacBook Pro



While Apple's 2025 MacBook lineup will undoubtedly look and feel familiar, more significant changes to the lineup are set to arrive in 2026.

Laptop with colorful app icons on screen, headphones beside it, small potted plant in background, set on a white desk.
The MacBook Pro will likely receive a redesign in 2026.



It's been rumored that the MacBook Pro will receive a chassis redesign, which will make the device significantly thinner and lighter, just in time for the platform's 20th anniversary. We've also heard about Apple's plans for a new OLED display, which would be a logical choice given that both the iPhone and iPad Pro already use the technology.

We were told that Apple once again plans to offer four high-end MacBook Pro configurations sometime in 2026, with device identifiers similar to their respective predecessors:


  • K114c -- MacBook Pro 14-inch with an M6 Max chip

  • K114s -- MacBook Pro 14-inch with an M6 Pro chip

  • K116c -- MacBook Pro 16-inch with an M6 Max chip

  • K116s -- MacBook Pro 16-inch with an M6 Pro chip



The device identifiers of these unreleased Macs suggest that we will once again see two size options: a 14-inch model and a 16-inch MacBook Pro, with different variants of the M6 chip. The M6 chip may feature a built-in cellular modem, as was previously rumored.

Having a built-in modem in future MacBook models would eliminate the need for using cell phones to tether a data connection when Wi-Fi is unavailable. A MacBook model with a built-in cellular modem could also act as its own hotspot, providing a signal for other nearby devices.

Apple's potential A18 Pro MacBook



Apart from the iterative M5-equipped devices and the redesigned 2026 MacBook Pro, AppleInsider was made aware of two other unreleased Mac configurations: J700 and J804.

Laptop with a reflective screen on a wooden bench, displaying a scenic desktop background, surrounded by a garden setting with dirt, leaves, and metal railings.
Apple is said to be working on a low-cost MacBook with an iPhone system-on-chip.



While the J804 could be a future Mac Pro or low-end MacBook Pro, it's not entirely clear what the J700 is. It may or may not be the low-cost A18 Pro MacBook that's recently been rumored.

Apple's entry-level MacBook was introduced in 2006. The white polycarbonate MacBooks were sold until 2012, when the range was discontinued. Apple then brought back the MacBook in 2015, in the form of a 12-inch laptop, which quietly vanished from store shelves only four years later.

While the MacBook Air has arguably taken the place of the once-iconic base-model MacBook, its $999 price tag isn't for everyone. A budget-oriented MacBook, with an A18 chip, would allow for an Apple Intelligence-capable device at a relatively low and accessible price point.

While Apple clearly wasn't going to abandon any of these lines, there was little evidence of the upcoming products beyond the usual rumors surrounding the supply chain. The existence of these identifiers solidifies the existence of these Macs, which can be expected between now and the end of 2026.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 20
    Penzipenzi Posts: 58member
    Dear Apple,

    the 11” MBAir was the closest I’ve ever come to liking a laptop. I was hopeful that a 12” MacBook would be that sweetest of things but having firmed up my financing, you canned it. Please revive the 12” MacBook with A series chip. Guaranteed sale.

    Yours,

    Me
    kiowawaSturmiTRAGargonaut
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 20
    quakerotisquakerotis Posts: 171member
    the best device is the one you own.

    When you are in the market, you buy the most current offering because that's what is offered.

    A bad worker blames the tool
    randominternetpersonwilliamlondonmacguimuthuk_vanalingamblurpbleepbloopfahlmanCalamanderzeus423
     2Likes 6Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 20
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,836member
    Though not new info, this is the part that excites me the most: 

    One report says the M5 Pro and M5 Max "will use 2.5D packaging" that has "separate CPU and GPU designs," and which will "improve production yields and thermal performance." TSMC's latest chip packaging process, known as "System-in-Integrated-Chips-Molding-Horizontal (SoIC-mH)" puts together different chips into one package, and the M5 Pro may be the first Apple chip with these changes.
    Separating the CPU and GPU into separate dies while retaining a very high speed connection within the same package opens up opportunities for valuable customizations that can better serve different user needs. For example, if you're a gamer (or anyone else who primarily needs GPU power), maybe you get a base CPU die but a couple of Max GPU dies. Alternatively, if your workloads benefit little from GPU but a lot from CPU, you could get a couple of Max CPU dies but a base GPU die. In other words, the kind of customization that was possible at the case level in a 2010 Mac Pro (ie, one or two CPU sockets with varying numbers of cores; one or more GPUs with varying number of cores) can now happen within the SOC package. 


    jrfunkAlex1Nmattinozargonaut
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 20
    racerhomie3racerhomie3 Posts: 1,266member
    Thanks for this Exclusive Appleinsider
    neoncatnarwhalSturmi
     2Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 20
    I'm running a maxed out 2019 Mac Pro (no, I don't have 1.5 TB of RAM!, but I have a lot). I run high end simulation software in MacOS, Windows 10, and Windows 11 depending on what the software requires.  

    I've been waiting on a new Mac Pro for some time. The last update effectively was a joke. The most recent Mac Studios were not much better. 

    If the next Mac Pro does not have at least an M4 Ultra (preferably an M5 Ultra) I may have to jump ship from using Mac hardware. As someone who has been using Apple hardware since the late 70s and Macs since 1984, jumping to some other platform will be painful. But if Apple is going to do something as stupid as come out with a Mac Pro with an M3 Ultra within the next six plus months, that means no Mac Pros acceptable to me before late 2027.

    I can't keep using this old 2019 Mac Pro for 2 1/2 more years! Simulation software evolves and gets both CPU and GPU hungrier. Apple needs to keep up with its flagship machine.

    I long for the days when the top of the line G4 Mac Pro was so fast (a lot faster than any Intel or AMD based machine). In fact it was so fast that for a short while the U.S. Government restricted the countries to which Apple could ship it. Apple needs to ship today's equivalent of that machine!
    libertyandfreewilliamlondonrandominternetpersonjrfunkAlex1NSturmidanoxargonaut
     7Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 20
    charlesncharlesn Posts: 1,538member
    Apple indicated 2-3 years ago that it intended M-chips to get updated annually, and it has been keeping to that schedule. You could predict the M6 and M7 release dates right now and probably be right. And as each successive iteration gets better, there are fewer and fewer people who actually need more horsepower than what the latest M-chips can provide, so increased processing speed becomes an increasingly unimportant reason to upgrade. Maybe AI will drive the need for more on-device processing power than is already available, but that's certainly not where we're at now. What becomes far more important is whatever else Apple has up its upgrade sleeve, especially with regard to improved displays and refreshed form factors. I don't know how many people were jonesing for a lighter iPhone--judging from the flopping sales of Samsung's Galaxy Edge, not that many!--but we're getting a lighter iPhone nonetheless. But MANY people would be happy with a lighter laptop if it didn't involve serious compromises to get there. I think the 2 pound weight of the 12" Macbook Retina was the ideal weight for a mainstream consumer laptop, and it would be great to see the 13" Macbook Air actually become that "airy" to carry. 
    edited July 3
    williamlondonkiowawaAlex1NCalamander
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 20
    kiowawakiowawa Posts: 23member
    Penzi said:
    Dear Apple,

    the 11” MBAir was the closest I’ve ever come to liking a laptop. I was hopeful that a 12” MacBook would be that sweetest of things but having firmed up my financing, you canned it. Please revive the 12” MacBook with A series chip. Guaranteed sale.

    Yours,

    Me
    Likewise. Guaranteed sale. 

    M.E.
    SturmiTRAGargonaut
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 20
    coolfactorcoolfactor Posts: 2,405member

    By reading these articles, am I complicit in this disgusting behaviour of confidential data leaks?

    How do the people leaking the data sleep at night, or look at themselves in a mirror?

    edited July 3
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 20
    anonymouseanonymouse Posts: 7,122member
    So, no information on upcoming M5 based Mac mini models? 

    Edit: Hmmm, another site lists J873s, Mac mini (M5 Pro), no date given.
    edited July 3
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 20
    charlesncharlesn Posts: 1,538member
    kiowawa said:
    Penzi said:
    Dear Apple,

    the 11” MBAir was the closest I’ve ever come to liking a laptop. I was hopeful that a 12” MacBook would be that sweetest of things but having firmed up my financing, you canned it. Please revive the 12” MacBook with A series chip. Guaranteed sale.

    Yours,

    Me
    Likewise. Guaranteed sale. 

    M.E.
    +1. Look, we're up to 3 sales already. How can Apple say no?
    Alex1Nmuthuk_vanalingamTRAGargonaut
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 20
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,877member

    Apple Silicon devices have been getting better through consistent iteration in terms of performance and power efficiency all Apple needs to do is continue that process, look at Intel, or IBM for what happens when you don’t, when you just want to rest on your laurels, when you start listening to people who say you don’t have to do anything just let it ride  that is when the decline starts. So keep raising the bar, Apple get into servers if you feel the need for another revenue/profit stream.
    thtneoncat
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 20
    raymondairaymondai Posts: 84member
    Interesting, pick a A-Series CPU to makes a Macbook, and use a M-Series CPU to makes an iPad.
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 20
    rezwitsrezwits Posts: 925member
    These leaks had to come eventually, because yes, it's NO SECRET now!  Which is a good thing!  We have a concrete roadmap to plan things out.

    And the only thing we will never know are the chassis designs... if new or not till some leak or 2 days before shows up...

    I am fine with that!  Just know you are going to be able to get which ever form factor you want and the chip every year is a relief...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 20
    Calamandercalamander Posts: 118member
    the best device is the one you own.

    When you are in the market, you buy the most current offering because that's what is offered.

    A bad worker blames the tool
    I was going to upgrade my 16" MBP M1 Pro to the latest M4 but really it's more like a vanity upgrade. 

    In my workflow Rust and XCode (iOS app building) max out the CPU but realistically I would look at a 2x improvement with an M4 Pro at best. 

    For all other tasks, there would be no difference at all - they're bottlenecked by network speed. 

    I'd get a little more battery life, probably.

    I don't game. Nobody seems to be using the neural network cores (bit of a shame...). I definitely have all Apple AI features turned off since it's all nonsense and non-working. 

    So I would pay $4,000 for a brand new ... or get a 15" M4 Air with almost the same performance I already have for $2,000... 

    Want yes, need absolutely not. The MBP - knock on wood - is built like a tank. I had to replace 1 key cap - my oily fingers always manage to get the key caps damaged, the A key rubs off first. 
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 20
    Calamandercalamander Posts: 118member

    I'm running a maxed out 2019 Mac Pro (no, I don't have 1.5 TB of RAM!, but I have a lot). I run high end simulation software in MacOS, Windows 10, and Windows 11 depending on what the software requires.  

    I've been waiting on a new Mac Pro for some time. The last update effectively was a joke. The most recent Mac Studios were not much better. 

    If the next Mac Pro does not have at least an M4 Ultra (preferably an M5 Ultra) I may have to jump ship from using Mac hardware. As someone who has been using Apple hardware since the late 70s and Macs since 1984, jumping to some other platform will be painful. But if Apple is going to do something as stupid as come out with a Mac Pro with an M3 Ultra within the next six plus months, that means no Mac Pros acceptable to me before late 2027.

    I can't keep using this old 2019 Mac Pro for 2 1/2 more years! Simulation software evolves and gets both CPU and GPU hungrier. Apple needs to keep up with its flagship machine.

    I long for the days when the top of the line G4 Mac Pro was so fast (a lot faster than any Intel or AMD based machine). In fact it was so fast that for a short while the U.S. Government restricted the countries to which Apple could ship it. Apple needs to ship today's equivalent of that machine!
    Apple Silicon are so much faster than these intel machines. It doesn't even compare. 

    My colleagues are using M2 Macbook Air for development - with 8GB of RAM. Almost a joke, but the M chips are so fast, it's still faster than any Intel laptop ever was. 

    I think why it takes them so long to make these Ultra chips is because it's 2 Max chips fused together acting as one - that's a very complex design, and the sales of high end desktop machines are negligible. So they don't make a ton of money with these. 

    That being said, the memory bandwidth of the M class chips is like normal computers graphics cards - it's super high. You basically get up to 700GB of graphics card memory. That used to be a supercomputer not too long ago. 

    Get the Ultra Mac Studio or wait for the next Pro, either way, it's going to fly.
    danox
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 20
    programmerprogrammer Posts: 3,503member
    I'm running a maxed out 2019 Mac Pro (no, I don't have 1.5 TB of RAM!, but I have a lot). I run high end simulation software in MacOS, Windows 10, and Windows 11 depending on what the software requires.  

    I've been waiting on a new Mac Pro for some time. The last update effectively was a joke. The most recent Mac Studios were not much better. 

    If the next Mac Pro does not have at least an M4 Ultra (preferably an M5 Ultra) I may have to jump ship from using Mac hardware. As someone who has been using Apple hardware since the late 70s and Macs since 1984, jumping to some other platform will be painful. But if Apple is going to do something as stupid as come out with a Mac Pro with an M3 Ultra within the next six plus months, that means no Mac Pros acceptable to me before late 2027.

    I can't keep using this old 2019 Mac Pro for 2 1/2 more years! Simulation software evolves and gets both CPU and GPU hungrier. Apple needs to keep up with its flagship machine.

    I long for the days when the top of the line G4 Mac Pro was so fast (a lot faster than any Intel or AMD based machine). In fact it was so fast that for a short while the U.S. Government restricted the countries to which Apple could ship it. Apple needs to ship today's equivalent of that machine!
    So is your bottleneck the size of main memory?  Or is it cpu speed? Or GPU speed?  Or memory bandwidth?  Have you actually benchmarked any of the new machines with the software you need?  If you need to run on Windows, is there an ARM version of what you’re running?  If not then you’re going to have problems, especially when they drop Rosetta2.  Otherwise, these machines are pretty damned fast, so I’d imagine your main restriction is going to be the size of memory.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 20
    I've been waiting on a new Mac Pro for some time.
    Why do you need a Mac Pro instead of a Mac Studio?
    williamlondon
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 20
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,877member
    I've been waiting on a new Mac Pro for some time.
    Why do you need a Mac Pro instead of a Mac Studio?


    If a large-screen iMac were available within an XDR enclosure, it would have been my preferred choice for my next Mac instead of a Studio Mac, I just couldn’t wait any longer and had to settle.

    The demand for a large-screen iMac or a tower version of a Mac remains substantial. Not everyone necessarily wants a laptop or even a studio-type device. Apple should expand its product offerings by making these two types of devices available. Additionally, they should design the necessary in-house hardware and software (which is relatively straightforward) and offer them to enable the creation of a Mac server using either the studio or tower (if the tower ever becomes available in the future).

    Apples in house GPUs are within striking distance of the discrete GPUs offered in the open market one or two generations away and Apple is Nvidia/AMD and Intel free for a reason.

    neoncatzeus423argonaut
     2Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 20
    CheeseFreezecheesefreeze Posts: 1,432member
    danox said:
    I've been waiting on a new Mac Pro for some time.
    Why do you need a Mac Pro instead of a Mac Studio?

    The demand for a large-screen iMac or a tower version of a Mac remains substantial.

    That’s an assumption based on your own personal desire. There’s no data to indicate that nowadays people prefer a third-party monitor combined with a Mac Mini or Studio.
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 20
    zeus423zeus423 Posts: 289member
    I gave up on getting a 27" iMac a long time ago. My next Mac will be a Mini, but I'm in no hurry. I'm waiting for an updated Studio Display. Until then, this Intel iMac keeps working fine and dandy.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.