Well, KDE and GNOME are two different windowing managers for X. Basically, they are completly different GUI's with different compatibility sets (that's a big difference). So I guess a simple answer to your question is, the GUI is the big difference.
...except in Red Hat and Yellow Dog Linux, where the GUI differences are eliminated through a common "BlueCurve" interface.
Yeah, they're different ways of easily writing graphical applications in *nix. Open source zealots don't like KDE because it isn't 100% open source in every possible way. Damn zealots.
I prefered GNOME 1.4 over KDE 2.x from a UI perspective, but KDE 3.x rocks. BlueCurve rocks even more.
Nothing comes close to Mac OS X of course, so I just judge it on "what's furthest ahead of Windows"
I am not a zealot. There are zealots who believe in the original Holy Commandments of Jeff Raskin and Bruce Togazannieneenenene. I don't know what they would prefer.
I like 1) BlueCurve, 2) KDE 3.x, 3) GNOME 2 in that order. I'm not basing that on anything other that my user experience.
As for a programming perspective, I don't really know. KDevelop seems alright for developing quick simple apps (eg shareware-style).
Comments
BEN
Yeah, they're different ways of easily writing graphical applications in *nix. Open source zealots don't like KDE because it isn't 100% open source in every possible way. Damn zealots.
Barto
Well, KDE and GNOME are two different windowing managers for X
KDE and GNOME are not window managers. They're complete desktop environments. They may be used in conjunction with a variety of window managers.
Originally posted by Barto
Open source zealots don't like KDE because it isn't 100% open source in every possible way. Damn zealots.
Usability zealots don't like KDE because it has worse flaws than GNOME does.
Nothing comes close to Mac OS X of course, so I just judge it on "what's furthest ahead of Windows"
I am not a zealot. There are zealots who believe in the original Holy Commandments of Jeff Raskin and Bruce Togazannieneenenene. I don't know what they would prefer.
I like 1) BlueCurve, 2) KDE 3.x, 3) GNOME 2 in that order. I'm not basing that on anything other that my user experience.
As for a programming perspective, I don't really know. KDevelop seems alright for developing quick simple apps (eg shareware-style).
Barto