Why can't Google sort searches by date/size/domain etc
http://forums.appleinsider.com/showt...ghlight=google
Still wondering. They've added lots of new stuff recently like News, News groups, Directory (looks like Yahoo, when'd they add that?), Translation (when will it come out of beta and when will it support the languages systran does!) but for such a high quality search engine I'm surprised sorting tools weren't there from the start. It wouldn't take too much horsepower?
Still wondering. They've added lots of new stuff recently like News, News groups, Directory (looks like Yahoo, when'd they add that?), Translation (when will it come out of beta and when will it support the languages systran does!) but for such a high quality search engine I'm surprised sorting tools weren't there from the start. It wouldn't take too much horsepower?
Comments
No one cares? This would make Google much better. And whatever happened to NorthernLight, there Search Folders were cool.
Just ad site:url to your query.
cant do it by file size but all of the options for their search are there...
Edit: like defiant i misread the topic...
Originally posted by Aquatic
That link isn't working and I don't see how this would sort results? Thanks anyway for replying Defiant.
How exactly isn't it working?
http://www.google.com/search?q=steve...site:wired.com
Originally posted by Defiant
How exactly isn't it working?
http://www.google.com/search?q=steve...site:wired.com
I think Aquatic means "sort" when he says "sort." He doesn't want the results restricted, but sorted by one or another field.
Hi Kevin,
Thank you for your note and your kind words. We always enjoy hearing
positive feedback from Google users.
Thank you for the suggestion for increased sorting options. We really
appreciate thoughtful feedback from our users, and we'll keep yours in
mind as we work to improve Google and add new features and services.
You might be interested in our date search function. To access this
feature, please visit our Advanced Search page at
http://www.google.com/advanced_search . You will have the option of
searching among pages modified in the the last 3, 6, or 12 months. We are
looking into ways we can improve this functionality in the future. We
appreciate your feedback and will keep it in mind as we grow and develop.
You may be interested in receiving our free bimonthly Google-Friends
Newsletter, which keeps you up to date on all the latest happenings at
Google. To sign up, please see
http://www.google.com/contact/newsletter.html. Please note that the
newsletter is written in English.
Regards,
The Google Team
Original Message Follows:
------------------------
From: Kevin MacLeod <[email protected]>
Subject: Suggestion: Sort results by date
created&modified/size/kind/domain
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 04:38:13 -0400
Hi,
\tGoogle is the best search engine, no question. Lots of new services
recently added are really nice, like USENET and News (I use this
daily!) I'd like to thank you for such an awesome service, and I love
how it's built in to Safari on MacOS X. But I have a question. Why
isn't sorting search results supported? By sorting I mean criteria
such as date created, modified, size of site, kind of site, the domain,
the author, the number links, a ton of criteria. This would also be
cool with Image Search, esp. Size, since I'm on a modem in the summer.
This couldn't take much overhead as most of the data is in the page's
source or header, and you could sort the pages in the browser without
needing to recontact Google and refresh the page, probably. I'm just
guessing on those though, as I'm no programmer, I just took a few
classes in BASIC. I also miss Northern Light's "Search Folders", but I
assume they are patented and you can't copy them. Those were damn cool and if Google didn't work for me (rare) I'd turn to Northern Light and then DogPile which searches all the search engines. I would
appreciate a response and thank you again, keep up the good work!
Fight Micro$oft, I don't want them owning the Internet and overtaking
Google with M$N and their new search engine tech.
Best,
Kevin MacLeod
They dodged the question... I can not see why it would be hard. Maybe I should work for them? Hey I took BASIC programming...
Google has definitely thought of this functionality. Here's my theory as to why it isn't implemented.
<theory>To perform quick searches it is important to have excellent index-schema and tree walking algorithms. It is likely that providing sorting on an additional/different attribute would necessitate an additional few hundred processors in their server farm. The entire database would have to be scanned, prior to presenting results, if sorted on a non-indexed attribute. Maintaining indices is a fairly heavy-weight task.</theory>