pat robertson is a retard!
he's praying for the removal of three supreme court justices, perhaps he has "insde info" that president bush won't have a second term.
one perspective
another
it's supreme court prayer offensive!
one perspective
another
it's supreme court prayer offensive!
Comments
"One justice is 83 years old, another has cancer and another has a heart condition. Would it not be possible for God to put it in the minds of these three judges that the time has come to retire?"
Wow. Praying against someone and mentioning their illnesses in your prayer.
Originally posted by BRussell
Wow. Praying against someone and mentioning their illnesses in your prayer.
i thought that exactly, it's justice ginsberg with cancer although i don't know what her current status is, she had surgery in 1999, but shouldn't he be praying for her health?
what the devil was he thinking?
(satan, not pat)
I am a firm believer in pluralism and I have no desire to affect politics in ways that do not allow for such.
I believe in the separation of Church and State. I am not so sure Robertson does and that is sad and not going to fly in a pluralistic society.
Fellowship
Start here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/...in562915.shtml
then go to these:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2003Jul9.html
http://www.rense.com/general38/pat.htm
http://www.theperspective.org/patrobertson_taylor.html
http://www.theperspective.org/liberiangold.html
as ?written off in my own mind? an $8 million investment in a Liberian gold mining venture he made four years ago, under an agreement with Taylor's government.
what the f&ck is a church leader investing 8 million in gold mines for?
oh that's right, to afford more soup for the soup kitchens.
re liberia.
robertson is inches away from being checked into a mental ward.
hypocrite, hypocrite, hypocrite
i smell a tipping point approaching...
Robertson, who has a law degree from Yale University, said rulings such as this were never envisioned by the framers of the U.S. Constitution.
I'm sure the same can be said for suffrage and the emancipation proclamation.
from the pledge. he shall shit a brick.
Originally posted by superkarate monkeydeathcar
wait 'til next year when the supreme court removes "under god"
from the pledge. he shall shit a brick.
That won't happen. Over 80% of the people oppose doing that, and it would be meaningless anyway, because there's a nasty little obstacle to enforcing it: The First Amendment.
Anway, Robertson is a bit of a wack job it seems. I actually don't have a problem with him praying for their retirement. If he wants conservative judges, than that's what he wants. It's his other rhetoric that's over the top..and senseless.
That won't happen. Over 80% of the people oppose doing that, and it would be meaningless anyway, because there's a nasty little obstacle to enforcing it: The First Amendment
Since when are S.C. desicions decided by polls?
Which of them thar fancy politoc declarations talks about the separation of church and state?
I look forward to days when right wing nuts such as patty robertson shît bricks. it tends mean things are going in the "left" direction...
Originally posted by SDW2001
That won't happen. Over 80% of the people oppose doing that, and it would be meaningless anyway, because there's a nasty little obstacle to enforcing it: The First Amendment.
the supreme court usually does extensive polling before they make rulings.
damn minutes late!
it was TOO easy...
i think that the court is above politics 2000 election included.
[i]Originally posted by superkarate monkeydeathcar
i think that the court is above politics 2000 election included.
Hell, my understanding is that it's involvement in the election marred it and thus forced it to shoot the other way and work to be as removed from politics as possible.