Apple, others, sued over hard-drive size claims
I for one support the suit. If your hard drive is really 56 Gb instead of 60 Gb, you should say so. 4 Gb (or whatever) is more than a rounding error.
See http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/030918/tech_...rs_suit_1.html
p.s. I don't really go in for the restitution bit, just want to see truth in advertising.
See http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/030918/tech_...rs_suit_1.html
p.s. I don't really go in for the restitution bit, just want to see truth in advertising.
Comments
60 GigaBytes is sixty-billion Bytes.
So what if a computer really reports GiBiBytes, of which there are 55.87935...
From the article:
For example, when a consumer buys what he thinks is a 150 gigabyte hard drive, the plaintiffs said, he actually gets only 140 gigabytes of storage space. That missing 10 gigabytes, they claim, could store an extra 2,000 digitized songs or 20,000 pictures.
That is a flat-out lie. He is getting exactly what is advertised. A 150 GigaByte HDD.
*For hard drive capacity measurements, 1GB = 1 billion bytes; actual formatted capacity less.
They have no right to sue and will lose.
further proof that some people should NEVER be allowed near computers. Do these people wonder why computer manufacturers dont include better cupholders on their computers as well?
Apple legal must be having a easy week.
Originally posted by Placebo
Well, my 160 GB drive on my G5 is actually 151 GB capacity, but you know what? I really don't care.
No, 160 and 151 are the same number. You've left out the variables (units of measurement). This is precisely the error the others have made.
"It's not the size of the drive, it's the length of it's write arm. "
Originally posted by The General
Actually, many drives and stuff I read on drives and pc boxes have stated stuff like 120GB(unformatted). IE: when you format it, you will have less space, and different formats also give different results.
Yeah, here's the thing... those crazy OS writers make the assumption that we want the computer to keep track of our files in a directory table. Thats stupid. I would much prefer to write them down on a piece of paper and refer to them by head and cylinder. That way I would always know where every byte was -- the way real programmers do!
The lawsuit will result in nothing because there is truth in the advertising. It's just an ambiguous truth.
Originally posted by torifile
It's got nothing to do with the formatting of the drive and everything to do with what Eugene said.
well, there is also some inaccessible portions of a hard disk, even after the difference between the metric and computer versions of Kilo, Mega, Giga (..). The file system (HFS, HFS+, fat32, ext2, ..) takes up a little piece of the hard drive too. also, when u format your hard disk (in Disk Utility), the program actually steals a few megs in separate invisible partitions for drivers and sometimes a bootstrap partition. if you use the command line utility 'pdisk' you can see these invisible partitions (NOTE: Be careful with pdisk, it can erase hard drives).
Originally posted by \\/\\/ickes
LAMO...
Apple legal must be having a easy week.
8)
first--60 gb is 60gb, they never say 60gb of storage, its only a size, like my size 10 nike, and my size 10.5 reaboks
second--this is only to generate $$$$$ for attorneys very little to the "victims" classic class action lawsuit againts blockbuster, i get a $3.50 coupon and the attorneys got 112 million dollars, it's a scam, most class actions suits are abused for attorney money generation very little help to consumers.
when i buy a HD at 60gb thats what i get no foul here.
1GB = 1 billion bytes; actual formatted capacity less." writen everywhere.
nyuck nyuck nyuck.
It really needs to be changed back.