iTunes for Windows installed on my machine, all is VERY good

2

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 51
    yevgenyyevgeny Posts: 1,148member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Mac Man 020581

    I am not even going to install iTunes on my Windows XP, because I don't see any point in it, all of my music and the music I have bought are on my Mac.



    I don't have a Mac, so this is like Christmas for me.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 51
    yevgenyyevgeny Posts: 1,148member
    So iTMS has totally trashed my productivity today. Probably tomorrow as well as I re-rip music like a mad man (I have been using ogg for my music format like the fool that I am). Way to go Apple.



    edit: one of my coworkers was also complaining how iTMS has nuked his productivity. Must... fix... bugs...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 51
    it keeps crashing!

    every time I try to add my mp3's to a playlist it just crash... but it looks great!





    hugs,

    mari0
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 51
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Aquatic

    No Ast3r3x you are gravely mistaken.



    This announcement dwarfs Panther and probably is even more important than PowerMac G5s. I loaded up Apple a few minutes ago and my roommate thought it was SomethingAwful.com because of the Hell Froze Over.



    He's diehard PC too. Not for long. Even he thinks it's cool.




    Would he have known or downloaded if it wasn't for being your roommate? I am not saying it isn't good, I am just saying this isn't going to be the same result (ratio wise) as when iTMS was released for Macs and everyone went and downloaded it. Number will hopefully be close, but proportionally I don't think it will be that impressive.



    I hope I am wrong though





    One thing I will say iTunes for PC needs is a way to import the music automatically. I guess search for music on this computer will work well, but when people download new stuff they will want it to automatically be added to their iTunes to stop them from using their programs that download their music.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 51
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Mac Man 020581

    I am not even going to install iTunes on my Windows XP, because I don't see any point in it, all of my music and the music I have bought are on my Mac.



    How about the fact that if they are on the same LAN you can stream the music from one machine to the other? That includes iTMS purchases.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 51
    Woah, you have a 15" LCD that runs at 1600x1200? Where did you buy it, I want one.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 51
    Quote:

    Originally posted by LoCash

    Woah, you have a 15" LCD that runs at 1600x1200? Where did you buy it, I want one.



    Can I be your opthamalogist when you need thick-ass glasses and lasik surgery?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 51
    etharethar Posts: 111member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Yevgeny

    It wasn't slow for me, I downloaded at > 1MB/sec (it is good to be at work). A coworker was having problems downloading so I assume that the site is getting hit pretty hard (which is a great sign for Apple). Apple is probably limiting you to your download rate.



    Yes, SBC is horrid. Get another provider if you can.




    Fixed it! Dad hooked up the fax machine to the dsl line without a filter, so one of SBC's CO's throttled down our bandwidth to compensate for the added noise on the line. www.apple.com and www.itunes.com scream once again
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 29 of 51
    pbg4 dudepbg4 dude Posts: 1,611member
    I've got my PC and PB sharing their respective libraries with each other. Tres cool!



    I had to turn on some sharing and add a windows login account (not sure if everything I did was necessary) before I could get iTunes on each computer to see the other library.



    Funny how iTunes draaags on my 500MHz PC.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 30 of 51
    That's disgusting that Windows can resize iTunes better than my Mac can. Dammit OSX really pisses me off. Sure it's pretty to look at, but if it can't resize a goddamn window with 768M RAM, then what the hell's the point?



    /frust.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 51
    progmacprogmac Posts: 1,850member
    i can't tell you how happy i am this came out. i just switched from mac to pc (need to run GIS applications) and have been whining because there are no good programs for the iPod. There is one called Media Center 9, but it pretty much sucks usability-wise. I was about to drop $40 on it because there was nothing else I could do. I am so thrilled!



    As a side note, I really miss the elegance of using OS X. Mac users take it for granted, but OS X seems so transparent compared to windows. Part of it i guess has to do that I haven't learned the shortcut keys yet. Also, windows doesn't distinguish between Window and Program and it is really annoying. I digress.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 32 of 51
    Wow! iTunes for Windows (XP) is great! I didn't expect it to have many of the options that the Mac version has. It runs great, sounds great, lists all my (3500) MP3s nicely and it's fast. It installed quickly too with no problems.



    Is there a way to export playlists from the Mac and import them to the PC? I like to have my collection sorted the same way on both of my computers.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 51
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Patchouli

    Wow! iTunes for Windows (XP) is great! I didn't expect it to have many of the options that the Mac version has. It runs great, sounds great, lists all my (3500) MP3s nicely and it's fast. It installed quickly too with no problems.



    Is there a way to export playlists from the Mac and import them to the PC? I like to have my collection sorted the same way on both of my computers.




    I don't even think there's an easy way to export a playlist from Mac to Mac much less windows.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 34 of 51
    mcqmcq Posts: 1,543member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Patchouli

    Wow! iTunes for Windows (XP) is great! I didn't expect it to have many of the options that the Mac version has. It runs great, sounds great, lists all my (3500) MP3s nicely and it's fast. It installed quickly too with no problems.



    Is there a way to export playlists from the Mac and import them to the PC? I like to have my collection sorted the same way on both of my computers.




    Not sure, but if you're computers are networked, why not just share the library from Mac to PC (assuming all your MP3s are on your Mac)?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 35 of 51
    Quote:

    Originally posted by MCQ

    Not sure, but if you're computers are networked, why not just share the library from Mac to PC (assuming all your MP3s are on your Mac)?



    Actually (thanks to the speed of FireWire and or USB 2.0) I have my MP3 collection on both my PC and Mac. The thing is, one is a desktop and one is a notebook - and I'd like to have my MP3 collection with (on the road) as well as on my desktop. So, iTunes for Windows beautifully imported all 3500 MP3s with all the tags in tact, but I guess now I just have to manually re-create all my playlists.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 36 of 51
    cygsidcygsid Posts: 210member
    for those complaining about resizing in iTunes being smoother on Windows than on Mac OS X, no worries there: resizing in Windows sucks too, if that's any consolation! And that's on a P4 1.8 Ghz with 1GB of RAM!!



    Other than that, iTunes on Windows rocks!!! I see great things in Apple's future.



    A few other things of interest:



    - iTunes is exactly the same as on the Mac, down to the fact that you have to first click anywhere on the iTunes window before you can activate any button. Kind of annoying when all other Windows apps behave in an opposite manner.



    - CPU usage of iTunes is SOOO LOOOWWWW on Windows compared to my Mac: hovers around 2-3%, when the range is more like 15-25% on the Mac (admittedly an iBook/700Mhz but still!)... oh and that's with that supposedly performance-killing text-scrolling effect. This to me is really what we should be rightly outraged about. What do the seemingly simplest things use so much CPU on OS X???
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 37 of 51
    resres Posts: 711member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by cygsid

    for those complaining about resizing in iTunes being smoother on Windows than on Mac OS X, no worries there: resizing in Windows sucks too, if that's any consolation! And that's on a P4 1.8 Ghz with 1GB of RAM!!



    -Snip-



    - CPU usage of iTunes is SOOO LOOOWWWW on Windows compared to my Mac: hovers around 2-3%, when the range is more like 15-25% on the Mac (admittedly an iBook/700Mhz but still!)... oh and that's with that supposedly performance-killing text-scrolling effect. This to me is really what we should be rightly outraged about. What do the seemingly simplest things use so much CPU on OS X???




    Outraged? Well, your 1.8GHz P4 system is probably about 3 to 4 times as powerful as your 700MHz G3 iBook, (once you figure in processors, bus, hard drives, etc). Add in a reasonable margin for error and I'd say that the numbers seem about right to me.



    On my 800Mz G4 powerbook iTunes usually stays between 4-9% (although it does bounce around a lot from 1.5-16%). I wonder what % it uses on a G5...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 38 of 51
    Quote:

    Originally posted by MCQ

    Hm.. installation went fine, everything works except for iTMS (actually the browse feature works, but I can't access home page/search page results)... does anyone know if it is dependent on Service Pack 1 for Windows XP in any way?



    MCQ, not to pick on you, I completely understand your frustration, but my wife and I were thoroughly amused by stories like this. If MS is so rich why is windows riddled with bizarre problems like this? I support a windows product. Recently I have been faced with error messages that sound more like Zen Koans than helpful, explanatory messages. One of my favorites:



    Unable to write past the end of an unnamed file.



    Does an unnamed file have an end and why would one want to write past the end of it in the first place?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 39 of 51
    mcqmcq Posts: 1,543member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by neutrino23

    MCQ, not to pick on you, I completely understand your frustration, but my wife and I were thoroughly amused by stories like this. If MS is so rich why is windows riddled with bizarre problems like this? I support a windows product. Recently I have been faced with error messages that sound more like Zen Koans than helpful, explanatory messages. One of my favorites:



    Unable to write past the end of an unnamed file.



    Does an unnamed file have an end and why would one want to write past the end of it in the first place?




    Hehe



    Well, it turned out to be a Norton Firewall issue, if it's activated it caused that error. No problems here now that I disactivated it temporarily (not that I ever wanted to buy tunes via iTMS on Windows as I do it on the Mac version, but I wanted to figure out why it wasn't working)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 40 of 51
    Does anyone know if the plan on making a version for Windows 98 SE? What they have now is only for XP or 2000.



    Later,



    Kyle
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.