LA Times on Panther

placeboplacebo
Posted:
in macOS edited January 2014
Completely muddled excuse of an article.



This makes no sense. Full sentences are too hard, huh?



Exposé was described horribly. I hope people don't judge Panther by this.



Comments

  • Reply 1 of 10
    miggs97miggs97 Posts: 87member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Placebo

    Completely muddled excuse of an article.



    This makes no sense. Full sentences are too hard, huh?



    Exposé was described horribly. I hope people don't judge Panther by this.







    Oh My God, that was the most incomprehensible review I have ever read.
  • Reply 2 of 10
    dog almightydog almighty Posts: 464member
    I remember essays I'd written in Grade 7 that were better constructed than that.
  • Reply 3 of 10
    thunderpoitthunderpoit Posts: 709member
    ya, i just love all that work that MS did on jag for apple
  • Reply 4 of 10
    nanonano Posts: 179member
    "Starting with Panther's predecessor, dubbed Jaguar, Apple Computer Inc. has, with help from Microsoft itself, created a computing environment that keeps users compatible with the Windows world and lets them do their stuff on the elegantly designed Mac line of laptops and desktops."



    What does that mean "microsoft helped apple make 10.3"? is this true? and if you noticed every paragraph of this article is one sentence.
  • Reply 5 of 10
    macsrgood4umacsrgood4u Posts: 3,007member
    The article originated in the Chicago Tribune. Write to Mr. Coates there. (I did.)
  • Reply 6 of 10
    staphbabystaphbaby Posts: 353member
    Yep, the way he describe Exposé makes you think that it's actually the Dock. Well done.



    Well, as my brother's fiancée would say: "his dash-work sucks, so he must be a loser".
  • Reply 7 of 10
    mcqmcq Posts: 1,543member
    Horrible. Those first two sentences feel like they've been written by someone who was told that they never used commas on their essays.
  • Reply 8 of 10
    carson o'geniccarson o'genic Posts: 1,279member
    Oh my, that was bad. I think those were his notes, not the actual article. Can someone say "rush job?"
  • Reply 9 of 10
    pbpb Posts: 4,255member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Placebo

    Completely muddled excuse of an article.







  • Reply 10 of 10
    murbotmurbot Posts: 5,262member
    Sweet jesus, that is horrible. Do they not have a freaking editor?
Sign In or Register to comment.