Weak Low-end G5
I would love to see a dual 1.6Ghz (with PCI-X) at the 1999 price point rather than a 300 dollar reduction on the single
just, i find it hard to spend 1800 plus display on a single processor tower anymore. i know it would be fast enough for me, but, it should be cheaper and if not, it should be dual.
it would be a sweet BTO option though, add a 1.6 processor for 300 or something
just, i find it hard to spend 1800 plus display on a single processor tower anymore. i know it would be fast enough for me, but, it should be cheaper and if not, it should be dual.
it would be a sweet BTO option though, add a 1.6 processor for 300 or something
Comments
Originally posted by applenut
I would love to see a dual 1.6Ghz (with PCI-X) at the 1999 price point rather than a 300 dollar reduction on the single
just, i find it hard to spend 1800 plus display on a single processor tower anymore. i know it would be fast enough for me, but, it should be cheaper and if not, it should be dual.
it would be a sweet BTO option though, add a 1.6 processor for 300 or something
You are right all G5 are made for dual.
Perhaps they are stockpiling the 1,6, or the 1,6 are for the IBM blade servers.
I still want to see the following by February:
2.0 GHz - $1800
2x2.0 GHz - $2400
2x2.5 GHz - $3000
Originally posted by Eugene
I think a 1.8 GHz G5 at the $1800 price point with all the features of the duals would be fine right now. Dual 1.6 is asking a bit much.
I still want to see the following by February:
2.0 GHz - $1800
2x2.0 GHz - $2400
2x2.5 GHz - $3000
In 3 months, maybe not so drastic, it took 4 months to slightly change the line up. by Feb maybe:
1.8 GHz, 8 DIMM slots & PCI-X - $1800
2x2.0 GHz - $2400
2x2.2 GHz - $3000
I'd rather see Apple inch their way up with the supplied processors than go 8 to 9 months between updates. If IBM has 2.2's then incorporate them in the line up ASAP. If you just got a machine it hurts less.