Spymac 3.0

bioflavonoidbioflavonoid
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
http://www.spymac.com/forums/showthr...threadid=54316

We're all really looking forward to 3.0 at Spymac. Yeah, the video is a little dorky, but it's impressive.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 17
    andersanders Posts: 6,523member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Bioflavonoid

    http://www.spymac.com/forums/showthr...threadid=54316

    We're all ...



    Who are we?



    Spymac? Weren´t they the iWalk cheaters?
  • Reply 2 of 17
    defiantdefiant Posts: 4,876member
    And? Do we at AppleInsider seem to care? Go back to Jonathan.
  • Reply 3 of 17
    bioflavonoidbioflavonoid Posts: 723member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Defiant

    And?



    No point, just thought I'd show it to you.
  • Reply 4 of 17
    bioflavonoidbioflavonoid Posts: 723member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Defiant

    And? Do we at AppleInsider seem to care? Go back to Jonathan.



    OK, OK.. whatever. I didn't mean to offend you..
  • Reply 5 of 17
    alcimedesalcimedes Posts: 5,486member
    lol, i don't think you offended anyone. just that people who would care about the spymac trailor probably have already seen it.
  • Reply 6 of 17
    bioflavonoidbioflavonoid Posts: 723member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by alcimedes

    lol, i don't think you offended anyone. just that people who would care about the spymac trailor probably have already seen it.



    True. I just heard AppleInsider mentioned on Spymac, and I thought I'd post about this here.
  • Reply 7 of 17
    defiantdefiant Posts: 4,876member
    Nah, you didn't offend me, but I don't really care about spymac3.



    Because, hey, the trailer is a load of crap, in my opinion of course, and yet I see people posting things like "WOW. Most moving film I saw, EVER!"



    I mean, I just have to laugh when I see this. I can't resist the urge.



    Take care over there.
  • Reply 8 of 17
    drewpropsdrewprops Posts: 2,321member
    Well....it's a good exercise in branding....not sure what else to say. They don't really MAKE anything, and I don't really care for their logo - couldn't imagine buying anything with somebody else's logo stuck on it anyway...so it mostly looks like somebody wanted to justify buying a DV camera and that coincided with the website's facelift.



    Trying really hard not to say "whatever" in Valley Girl style.
  • Reply 9 of 17
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    my God...



    and I thought I needed to get out of the house more.
  • Reply 10 of 17
    alcimedesalcimedes Posts: 5,486member
    my god.



    stopped over there for a look, and i have to say.



    THANK YOU for not allowing avatars. how in the world anyone can read anything over there is beyond me.
  • Reply 11 of 17
    defiantdefiant Posts: 4,876member
    Gaps so huge you could loose a frickin' bear in them too!
  • Reply 12 of 17
    torifiletorifile Posts: 4,024member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by alcimedes

    my god.



    stopped over there for a look, and i have to say.



    THANK YOU for not allowing avatars. how in the world anyone can read anything over there is beyond me.



    If you think that's bad (and it is), you should go over to howardforums.com and check out their obscenely large sig images. It's absolutely disgusting. I can't stand that place. Too bad it's the only decent cellphone forum out there. :/



    ps - check out this thread. First one I clicked on and it's repulsive...
  • Reply 13 of 17
    andersanders Posts: 6,523member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Defiant

    Gaps so huge you could loose a frickin' bear in them too!



    Yeah. I´ll sue them for wasting my screen real estate.



    So whats the deal about? They did a video. Not like we haven´t seen them do that before This time at least they didn´t try to fool people with fake products.
  • Reply 14 of 17
    bioflavonoidbioflavonoid Posts: 723member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by applenut

    my God...



    and I thought I needed to get out of the house more.



    I admit - it was a little over-the-edge. But, it's just a little hard to understand unless you're a regular there like I am.
  • Reply 15 of 17
    mggmgg Posts: 124member
    I think spymac 3 will be sweet!
  • Reply 16 of 17
    rokrok Posts: 3,519member
    wow, i haven't even THOUGHT about spymac in, what, six months? longer? considering how much i follow the rumor-mill, they must've just worn out their welcome with me a while back (plus, macrumors.com is still the best fr summarizing anything out there WORTH summarizing... i.e., they haven't seen anything come out of the spymac camp worth mentioning, which is why i haven't missed them).
  • Reply 17 of 17
    akumulatorakumulator Posts: 1,111member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by alcimedes

    my god.



    stopped over there for a look, and i have to say.



    THANK YOU for not allowing avatars. how in the world anyone can read anything over there is beyond me.



    I like the format of this forum, but there are other forums where I enjoy the avatars and signatures.... like this one:



    Red Orchestra
Sign In or Register to comment.