TAKE YOUR PICK . . . any of the above could have been said of Saddam Hussain during our long and illustrious career supporting him militarily and financialy . . .
and can be currently said of many of our supposed friends . . . Uzbeckistan, Tajickistan, Ukrain (to some extent) Packistan, Saudi Arabia . . . keep trying . . .
and what the HELL does your reply have to do with the post that you quoted from?
BTW, I think an apology for your assinine innuendo is appropriate.
So we should invade those countries to correct the problem?
And how many of them have been warned umpteen times by the world?
You obviously do not understand why the US supported him, it was a necessary evil.
I love the way hindsight is 20/20. Don't you?
EDIT: BTW, you can't defend bad behavior with other bad behavior.
You're crazy. How can you prove an implication? We also were not just talking about nuclear bombs, but dirty bombs and bio/chem weapons.
Yeah but we didn't find anything that would matter.
Say it slowly ( you love to do this to other people ) lllllllloooooooooossssssssiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnggggg bbbbbbbaaaaaaaaaaattttttttlllllllllleeeeeeeeee!!!! !!!!!
I wasn't fooled into anything. I support our actions in Iraq for many reasons. The real hilarity is found in the fools that argue that Saddam was no threat and that we had no real reason to invade.
No more of a threat than any of the other petty dictators in the world that we once supported.
That's the point. How do pick one of them? Stick a pin in a map?
Comments
Originally posted by pfflam
TAKE YOUR PICK . . . any of the above could have been said of Saddam Hussain during our long and illustrious career supporting him militarily and financialy . . .
and can be currently said of many of our supposed friends . . . Uzbeckistan, Tajickistan, Ukrain (to some extent) Packistan, Saudi Arabia . . . keep trying . . .
and what the HELL does your reply have to do with the post that you quoted from?
BTW, I think an apology for your assinine innuendo is appropriate.
So we should invade those countries to correct the problem?
And how many of them have been warned umpteen times by the world?
You obviously do not understand why the US supported him, it was a necessary evil.
I love the way hindsight is 20/20. Don't you?
EDIT: BTW, you can't defend bad behavior with other bad behavior.
Originally posted by NaplesX
So we should invade those countries to correct the problem?
And how many of them have been warned umpteen times by the world?
You obviously do not understand why the US supported him, it was a necessary evil.
I love the way hindsight is 20/20. Don't you?
EDIT: BTW, you can't defend bad behavior with other bad behavior.
For some it was never hindsight.
Originally posted by SDW2001
You're crazy. How can you prove an implication? We also were not just talking about nuclear bombs, but dirty bombs and bio/chem weapons.
Yeah but we didn't find anything that would matter.
Say it slowly ( you love to do this to other people ) lllllllloooooooooossssssssiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnggggg bbbbbbbaaaaaaaaaaattttttttlllllllllleeeeeeeeee!!!! !!!!!
Originally posted by SDW2001
I wasn't fooled into anything. I support our actions in Iraq for many reasons. The real hilarity is found in the fools that argue that Saddam was no threat and that we had no real reason to invade.
No more of a threat than any of the other petty dictators in the world that we once supported.
That's the point. How do pick one of them? Stick a pin in a map?