IBM PowerPC PDA chip

Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware edited January 2014
Interesting article about this IBM PDA processor.



What if Apple's PDA featured this PowerPC processor and a scale down version of OS X which would support all existing OS X software library and the following hardware features ?:



- 4" screen (check out MacWhispers' latest rumor for this)

- Firewire 400 (or 800)

- Bluetooth ready

- Airport ready (std or extreme)

- GSM/GPRS

- 10 GB HD (efature unavailable from any PDA today

- SD/Compact Flash 1 and 2 compatible to use extentions like cameras or to connect to a video projector

- GPS/Tuner FM/Television (TI makes a tiny chip that does all this)



And the following software features:

- Inkwell/Graphiti/virtual keyboard as input methods

- iTunes

- iPhoto

- Quicktime 6 to play movie files

- Safari for internet files or standalone flash apps

- iCal

- and even a "Pocket Keynote" for presentations on the go



All this perfectly syncronised with iSync.

From a hardware or software point of view, Apple masters all technologies. What are they waiting for ?



I read from a lot of you that you wish that the iPod remains as it is today. Very simple, very light and ... well nearly perfect. I think you are perfectly right. The iPod must remain what it is. A juke box player.



An Apple PDA would have a different target audience and both world can perfectly coexist alongside. So I think...and you ?



What do you think<a href="http://www-3.ibm.com/chips/splash/405lp/"; target="_blank">IBM PDA chip</a>

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    guarthoguartho Posts: 1,208member
    I don't know how likely that will be, but with that feature list, I'd buy one... as soon as I could afford it that is.
  • Reply 2 of 9
    Indeed. What are they waiting for?



    Lemon Bon Bon
  • Reply 3 of 9
    Oh, I forgot.

    And just to blow the competition and to answer usual critics that the Mac would be another plateform to support for developers, Bla bla bla, I would ad a Palm OS 5 emulator, so this PDA would also support the HUGE Palm software library.



    I can't wait



    P.S:I am not sure about Palm OS 5 as it already includes a Palm OS 4 emulator. That would make Apple create an Emulator of emulator. Does that work ?
  • Reply 4 of 9
    And a battery life of 15 minutes.



    <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
  • Reply 5 of 9
    wmfwmf Posts: 1,164member
    OS X would run like a dog on the 405LP; sorry.
  • Reply 6 of 9
    outsideroutsider Posts: 6,008member
    OS X would need at least the power of a 440 series processor, either the 440GP or 440GX. But the added processing power would result in more power usage.
  • Reply 7 of 9
    japhjaph Posts: 29member
    [quote]Originally posted by Outsider:

    <strong>OS X would need at least the power of a 440 series processor, either the 440GP or 440GX. But the added processing power would result in more power usage.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    What about Darwin, and a new GUI that's source code compatible with some subset of an OS X API?
  • Reply 8 of 9
    outsideroutsider Posts: 6,008member
    [quote]Originally posted by japh:

    <strong>



    What about Darwin, and a new GUI that's source code compatible with some subset of an OS X API?</strong><hr></blockquote>

    Maybe. Could be why Apple has an interest in X11 all of a sudden.
  • Reply 9 of 9
    Nah... they just want to court all the big-iron software guys. If they have an X11 server/client, then porting becomes cake
Sign In or Register to comment.