Low-end Xserve

Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware edited January 2014
Maybe this has been discusses already ... but I think Apple should sell a low-end Xserve to compete with the Cobalt's Raq's. Something for $1500 or less.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 15
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,425member
    Good idea.



    All Apple would need is a 10 client OSX Server



    8mb graphics



    10/100/1000 Ethernet



    Two HD bays.
  • Reply 2 of 15
    Too many posts have I read that mention that the unlimited OS X sevrer license is basically free. So, dropping it to 10 users won't cut the cost of an Xserve. It will make it 'low end' though. I don't think that there is even a market for a 'low end' Xserve from Apple. Those that need servers usually aren't that concerned with getting the cheap way in.
  • Reply 3 of 15
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    The Xserve is low end.
  • Reply 4 of 15
    Yeah, but I think the poster was looking for even more low end.
  • Reply 5 of 15
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,425member
    [quote]Originally posted by FrostyMMB:

    <strong>Too many posts have I read that mention that the unlimited OS X sevrer license is basically free. So, dropping it to 10 users won't cut the cost of an Xserve. It will make it 'low end' though. I don't think that there is even a market for a 'low end' Xserve from Apple. Those that need servers usually aren't that concerned with getting the cheap way in.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    That bugs me too. Steve Jobs has repeatedly said OSX Server is not factored into the cost. What I meant was to scale back the user license as a way of Apple being able to offset their low cost once a company expands beyond 10 clients



    [ 02-28-2003: Message edited by: hmurchison ]</p>
  • Reply 6 of 15
    Well, my point was, why would you want a 10 user license when the infinitely many user license comes at no extra charge?
  • Reply 7 of 15
    os10geekos10geek Posts: 413member
    The xServe should drop the 4 hard drives. I mean, not drop them totally, but give you an option to only have 1-max capacity. Rendering 3d and DV doesn't require more than one, if any, hard drive in the machine. You would think that now, with the xServe RAID, that the xServe wouldn't need to be such a storage solution. Maybe Apple could make a modular, barebones xServe for rendering and scientific stuff, kinda like the Linux "Briq". Apple could make an xServe the same 1U size, but replace the HD bays with hot-swap processor nodes, so you could add extra processors relatively inexpensively and easily. How many processors can OS X Server handle? <img src="confused.gif" border="0">



    [ 03-01-2003: Message edited by: os10geek ]</p>
  • Reply 8 of 15
    o and ao and a Posts: 579member
    [quote]Originally posted by os10geek:

    <strong>The xServe should drop the 4 hard drives. I mean, not drop them totally, but give you an option to only have 1-max capacity. Rendering 3d and DV doesn't require more than one, if any, hard drive in the machine. You would think that now, with the xServe RAID, that the xServe wouldn't need to be such a storage solution. Maybe Apple could make a modular, barebones xServe for rendering and scientific stuff, kinda like the Linux "Briq". Apple could make an xServe the same 1U size, but replace the HD bays with hot-swap processor nodes, so you could add extra processors relatively inexpensively and easily. How many processors can OS X Server handle? :confused:



    [ 03-01-2003: Message edited by: os10geek ]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    You mean blades? Oh and more hard drives is helpful.



    Seems to me you just want a powermac that looks like an xserve for no practical reason.
  • Reply 9 of 15
    robertrobert Posts: 12member
    the x serve is low end
  • Reply 10 of 15
    o and ao and a Posts: 579member
    [quote]Originally posted by robert:

    <strong>the x serve is low end</strong><hr></blockquote>



    that point has been made
  • Reply 11 of 15
    brbr Posts: 8,395member
    [quote]Originally posted by O and A:

    <strong>



    that point has been made</strong><hr></blockquote>



    the xserve is low end.
  • Reply 12 of 15
    os10geekos10geek Posts: 413member
    Well, I think that we ahve come to the conclusion that the xServe is "low end"...
  • Reply 13 of 15
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,425member
    The Xserve.............is low end. <img src="graemlins/cancer.gif" border="0" alt="[cancer]" />
  • Reply 14 of 15
    os10geekos10geek Posts: 413member
    Yes, you be right 'bout dat! :cool:
  • Reply 15 of 15
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,425member
    The real questions is.



    When is Apple going to attack the Midrange Server market.



    Something like a 2U Server with some OOMPFH!!
Sign In or Register to comment.