7.6 GigaFLOPS - How about you?

13567

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 122
    bungebunge Posts: 7,329member
    System: TiBook 667 w/512 MB PC133 CL3



    2317.3 MegaFlops w/Altivec

    332.3 w/o Altivec
  • Reply 42 of 122
    fobiefobie Posts: 216member
    Got just below 400 megafops on my iBook 600/384/15. I had a couple of applications running then but I dont think it matters alot.
  • Reply 43 of 122
    papiliopapilio Posts: 20member
    Powerbook G3 400MHz (Lombard), 384MB RAM - 230 MegaFlops
  • Reply 44 of 122
    getafxgetafx Posts: 21member
    Here's a Yikes result:

    G4 350mhz 128meg RAM

    1st-11.5sec -1175.4megaflops

    2nd-11.3sec-1192.7megaflops



    -so any G4 gets a Gigaflop
  • Reply 45 of 122
    ti fighterti fighter Posts: 863member
    933 G4 512ram



    3337.6 MegaFlops in OSX



    so a little less than half the speed of a dual 1ghz, sounds right to me
  • Reply 46 of 122
    bodhibodhi Posts: 1,424member
    6935.1 MegaFlops in Fractal Carbon



    Dual GHz
  • Reply 47 of 122
    tigerwoods99tigerwoods99 Posts: 2,633member
    I thought Apple says the Dual GHz can get 15 Gflops? What's up with that?



    Damn, the 933 is only half as fast? That means it would be a bad deal if I tried getting one. Makes sense but I dunno.
  • Reply 48 of 122
    enderender Posts: 353member
    The number they use for propaganda is only theoretical. If you managed to write a program that actually got that in real life, you would be instantly offered jobs with some incredible salary. Conditions are never optimal in the real world... so only 15 GF on paper.



    -Ender
  • Reply 49 of 122
    thentrothentro Posts: 231member
    on my G4 450 w 256 megs of RAM I got 1599 megaflops with OSX .1.2



    if I can only get afew more flops I could break 1600!
  • Reply 50 of 122
    arnearne Posts: 29member
    pb g4 = 1,2 gf
  • Reply 51 of 122
    daverdaver Posts: 496member
    iMac DV SE

    500 MHz G3

    OS 9.2.1



    45.1 seconds, 316.3 MFlops
  • Reply 52 of 122
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    I get around 6.9-7.0 GFLOPS on the default settings with my Dual GHz as well.



    If I zoom in on an all black portion, I can get 8.1-8.2 GFLOPS. Heh.
  • Reply 53 of 122
    macratmacrat Posts: 35member
    ibook 466 se: 56.1 sec / 256 MegaFlops
  • Reply 54 of 122
    gullivergulliver Posts: 122member
    [quote]Originally posted by ThunderPoit:

    <strong>867 w/ 384MB and os 10.1.2

    altivec on: 3209.9MFLOPS

    altivec off: 455.2 MFLOPS



    :eek:

    so altivec /can/ make a difference</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Same hardware config, but OS 9.2.1:

    altivec on: 3108MFLOPS

    altivec off: 455MFLOPS
  • Reply 55 of 122
    thentrothentro Posts: 231member
    [quote]Originally posted by Eugene:

    <strong>I get around 6.9-7.0 GFLOPS on the default settings with my Dual GHz as well.



    If I zoom in on an all black portion, I can get 8.1-8.2 GFLOPS. Heh.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    heh I got a big bost too



    from

    1599 to 1699 gflops



    damn it! what is with this G4 450 that it wont get that extra inch!!!

  • Reply 56 of 122
    bernardbernard Posts: 59member
    G4's are still hardly any more useful except for a few (5-6) things. Whats the point of this benchmark? its like running a floting point benchmark on a 68k machine with no FPU and comparing it to one that has one. comparing it to G3 cass machines is, well whats the point? Oh and my G4 gets 1316 and my G3 gets 353 but any other benchmark my G3 is faster oh wait my G3 is faster.
  • Reply 57 of 122
    ti fighterti fighter Posts: 863member
    [quote]Originally posted by TigerWoods99:

    <strong>I thought Apple says the Dual GHz can get 15 Gflops? What's up with that?



    Damn, the 933 is only half as fast? That means it would be a bad deal if I tried getting one. Makes sense but I dunno.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    This test uses both proccesors fully, so 2 1gig proccessors have the power of 2ghz, twice the speed. In the real world thats not gonna happen, even in photoshop, its gonna use both proccessors but not fully like this app does. So yea it will be faster than the 933 but not double as fast like in the fractal test. Hey if you can afford it get the dual, i would have if i had more $, but the 933 is f'n fast. Just so you get an idea, its not really fair to compare but my 933 with 512 ram feels like 100% faster then my Ti 550 with 512 at work (especially in photoshop).
  • Reply 58 of 122
    onebishoponebishop Posts: 1member
    Titanium PowerBook G4 800 averaged 2.8 gigaflops and managed to get upto 3.35 gigaflops several times. :eek:
  • Reply 59 of 122
    multimediamultimedia Posts: 1,035member
    System: G4 500MHz Cube 1.5 GB RAM OS 10.1.5



    Results: default launch 9.3 seconds 1450.9 MegaFlops or 1.45 GigaFlops



    Pretty bad number but this Mac feels quite quick for DSL web browsing, writing, mail.



    Looking forward to Jaguar performance improvement. Still on teh fence about moving to the dual 1.25 GHz MysteryMac?
  • Reply 60 of 122
    boemaneboemane Posts: 311member
    Im on a TiBook 667 (Rev B) and I found some weird results.



    I ran the test with only Chimera running, and got 2112 MFLOPS. Thats with an instant refresh after launch of the app. (Usually got 2080 right after restart).



    But when I zoomed in I got some interesting results:



    01x: 1355

    02x: 1119

    03x: 1179

    04x: 1372

    05x: 1643

    06x: 1776

    ---

    15x: 2159

    16x: 2112

    17x: 1969

    20x: 1528

    ---



    What I find weird is that after 20x zoom, theres only one color to display, but its only working at 1500, while 15x is the fastest at 2159 when it has to dispay two colors).



    Maybe it has something to do with the cache beeing loaded or something.



    Ona side note: With these results, I want a DP 1.25 GHz machine!! :eek:



    BoeManE
Sign In or Register to comment.