white will probably outsell the black. So something everybody have can´t be sexy in my book. Its the same as saying a generic pair of breasts are sexy. You gotta spice them up for them to become sexy. Welcome black.
From the report here it looks like black shipped in lesser number but is outselling white. I think I want a black 4G but 1) need to see it hands on first and 2) don't want to wait months for it to ship.
If I had to get one, I would get the black. However, I still like my 6 gig iPod mini. I cannot believe they have gotten rid of the iPod mini with no 6 gig option for the iPod nano. I guess they want people to move up to the larger iPod. Heck for just $50 more, you can get 16 extra gig if the size of the regular iPod is not an issue.
If I had to get one, I would get the black. However, I still like my 6 gig iPod mini. I cannot believe they have gotten rid of the iPod mini with no 6 gig option for the iPod nano. I guess they want people to move up to the larger iPod. Heck for just $50 more, you can get 16 extra gig if the size of the regular iPod is not an issue.
If the question was: how much more black could the iPod be, the answer would be none...none more black.
The black nano reminds me of the monolith from 2001...I would love to see someone with photshopping skills make a clever picture as an homage to the kubrick/clarke classic using the nano as a monolith.
The black nano reminds me of the monolith from 2001...I would love to see someone with photshopping skills make a clever picture as an homage to the kubrick/clarke classic using the nano as a monolith.
That was awesome, exactly what I had imagined. And totally off topic, did anyone notice that HAL is one letter off from IBM?
"The author of 2001, Arthur C Clarke emphatically denies the legend [of HAL representing IBM] in his book "Lost Worlds of 2001", claiming that "HAL" is an acronym for "Heuristically programmed algorithmic computer". Clarke even wrote to the computer magazine Byte to place his denial on record. ....
Why would Clarke deny it if it were true? I can think of several reasons: perhaps Clarke invented it as an in-joke that became too public, and he didn't want to risk offending IBM who had provided much technical help for the film."
Anyone actually like the movie more than the book this time? I did, and yet I feel that it's the exception that makes its way around the rule because one isn't an adaptation of the other since they were both created simultaneously and in collaboration.
Comments
Originally posted by Anders
Or "butt"
LOL damn that "t" next to "y".
From the report here it looks like black shipped in lesser number but is outselling white. I think I want a black 4G but 1) need to see it hands on first and 2) don't want to wait months for it to ship.
Originally posted by kwsanders
If I had to get one, I would get the black. However, I still like my 6 gig iPod mini. I cannot believe they have gotten rid of the iPod mini with no 6 gig option for the iPod nano. I guess they want people to move up to the larger iPod. Heck for just $50 more, you can get 16 extra gig if the size of the regular iPod is not an issue.
Exactly.
The black nano reminds me of the monolith from 2001...I would love to see someone with photshopping skills make a clever picture as an homage to the kubrick/clarke classic using the nano as a monolith.
-Roy
I think they should change colors with each revision of all their stuff. In a classy apple way, of course.
Apple gets more money from me. Yay.
The black nano reminds me of the monolith from 2001...I would love to see someone with photshopping skills make a clever picture as an homage to the kubrick/clarke classic using the nano as a monolith.
well, hope that was clever enough for ya...
Originally posted by OrbitPink
Now we need a poll of who actually bought one and which color they got.
I bought a black 4G....
Should get it some time....
Originally posted by Gm7Cadd9
That was awesome, exactly what I had imagined. And totally off topic, did anyone notice that HAL is one letter off from IBM?
"The author of 2001, Arthur C Clarke emphatically denies the legend [of HAL representing IBM] in his book "Lost Worlds of 2001", claiming that "HAL" is an acronym for "Heuristically programmed algorithmic computer". Clarke even wrote to the computer magazine Byte to place his denial on record. ....
Why would Clarke deny it if it were true? I can think of several reasons: perhaps Clarke invented it as an in-joke that became too public, and he didn't want to risk offending IBM who had provided much technical help for the film."
link
Anyone actually like the movie more than the book this time? I did, and yet I feel that it's the exception that makes its way around the rule because one isn't an adaptation of the other since they were both created simultaneously and in collaboration.
--B