The 17" is already pretty big. So i don't think there will be a 19" but there will eventually be a 12" and 17" IMO unless they decided to only have one option.
The 17" is already pretty big. So i don't think there will be a 19" but there will eventually be a 12" and 17" IMO unless they decided to only have one option.
Only time would tell.
but won't it be cool to have a 19" with 2 intel core duo inside. man i would wet my pants
i think the Mac Book Pro will stick with the 15", and MAYBE get a 17". I'm thinking one of the main obstacles perhaps with a 17" is battery life. Just because there is something fishy with the 15" battery life (Apple has not posted specs). And then I think the iBook will stay at the 13".
)
Comments
Only time would tell.
Originally posted by Jwink3101
The 17" is already pretty big. So i don't think there will be a 19" but there will eventually be a 12" and 17" IMO unless they decided to only have one option.
Only time would tell.
but won't it be cool to have a 19" with 2 intel core duo inside. man i would wet my pants
This eliminates overlap.
Originally posted by Gene Clean
No, no, 23". To complement the new iMac. After all, who would mind carrying a 16 pound lapzilla?
30"! When the Cinema Displays can be that large, so can the MacBooks!
And I dont believe Apple will release a ~12" MacBook..
Originally posted by Gene Clean
No, no, 23". To complement the new iMac. After all, who would mind carrying a 16 pound lapzilla?
Heh, I do it all the time. It's not so bad, really.