New PowerMac specs

2456715

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 300
    More seriously :

    - OS X (preemptive multitask, protected memory, multiple users, true GUI)

    - Good hardware (if these specs are true, best will be the "G5" at 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 GHz)

    - lower price (if this is true)



    THE 3 BEST REASONS TO SWITCH...



    All the reasons that PC users blame to the mac are killed (no protected memory, not multitask, to oexpensive, too sloww)

    NEXT step : a iOffice with compatibility with msOffice and Wintel will be very bad.



    Well done Steve.



    Aw
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 300
    keyboardf12keyboardf12 Posts: 1,379member
    Macrumors.com are reporting that these specs are _WWWWWRRRRRRRROOOOOONNNNNGGGGGGGGGG____



    (wrong)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 300
    I guess the specs were too good to be true.



    <a href="http://www.macrumors.com"; target="_blank">link</a>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 300
    nonsuchnonsuch Posts: 293member
    From MacMinute:

    [quote]New Power Mac G4 systems to be unveiled tomorrow with speeds up to 1.25GHz

    August 12 - 16:33 EDT Apple will unveil new Power Mac G4 systems tomorrow, MacMinute has learned. Sources inform us that three configurations will be offered: dual-867MHz (US$1,699), dual-1GHz ($2,499), and dual-1.25GHz ($3,299). The dual-1GHz and dual-1.25GHz models will feature ATI Radeon 9000 series graphics cards; additional system-specific details are not available. The dual-867MHz configuration is slated to ship by the end of the week, while the new dual-1GHz model will ship towards the end of the month. Availability of the high-end dual-1.25GHz model is being pegged at sometime in September. Current Power Mac G4 systems will be reduced in price as follows: 800MHz ($1,299), 933MHz ($1,499) and dual-1GHz ($2,199). Additionally, Apple will introduce a SuperDrive-equipped eMac for $1,499, sources say, and will reduce the price of CD-RW and Combo Drive iMacs by $100 to $1,299 and $1,499, respectively.<hr></blockquote>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 300
    leonisleonis Posts: 3,427member




    [ 08-12-2002: Message edited by: Leonis ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 300
    The specs post by macosrumors.com on Thursday 8 August are nearly the same (1, 1.2 and 1.4 GHz with 1.2 and 1.4 being the 7470)...





    Aw
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 300
    outsideroutsider Posts: 6,008member
    1.25GHz? What's the bus speed?

    hint:

    166MHz * 7.5



    <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 300
    whoamiwhoami Posts: 301member
    that sucks if true! i guess i was too hyped up by those overly optimistic specs above! hehehehe. i'm not buying til' january anyway!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 300
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    All duals. Not staggering, but nice. The closeout price on the old dual GHz isn't bad, either.



    It looks like the old mobo stays for one more round...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 300
    leonisleonis Posts: 3,427member
    MacMinute reported the top end will be only 1.25GHz at $3,300



    doesn't seem like good thing for Apple. <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 300
    nonsuchnonsuch Posts: 293member
    FWIW, I don't ever recall MacMinute being wrong with any 11th-hour predictions like these.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 300
    1.25 GHz <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" /> <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" /> <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" /> <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" /> <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" /> <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" /> <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />



    Steve, are we $-cows ?



    I will wait tomorrow and if this is true, I really switch to PC-Linux.



    An no update for the powerbook ?



    Aw



    [ 08-12-2002: Message edited by: Appleworm ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 300
    leonisleonis Posts: 3,427member
    Fine...I think I should now keep using my SlowSilver(tm) until next year.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 300
    cthulucthulu Posts: 20member
    "configurations will be offered: dual-867MHz (US$1,699), dual-1GHz ($2,499), and dual-1.25GHz ($3,299)."





    Now this sounds like apple! Thanks apple for letting me keep my money another 6+ months!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 35 of 300
    bodhibodhi Posts: 1,424member
    I have yet to remember when MacMinute was wrong so I must say that if these machines have SDRAM... I think we will continue to hear Fred Anderson in earnings calls blaming low Power Mac sales on no Quark for OSX.



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 36 of 300
    jlljll Posts: 2,713member
    [quote]Originally posted by cthulu:

    <strong>"configurations will be offered: dual-867MHz (US$1,699), dual-1GHz ($2,499), and dual-1.25GHz ($3,299)."





    Now this sounds like apple! Thanks apple for letting me keep my money another 6+ months! </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Since they will sell the current Dual 1 GHz for $300 less than the new one, there will be more than just updated processor speeds.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 36 of 300
    I can't think of a time when MacMinute has been wrong either. And the news is...yet again...dissapointing beyond belief.



    The price drop is the only thing interesting me (dual 1Ghz dropping $500).



    [ 08-12-2002: Message edited by: oranjdisc ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 38 of 300
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    I don't think MacMinute has ever been wrong with last-minute specs either. They're good.



    Before people start 'ing and running off to PCs: All we know is processor speed, video card and price. That's not much. I'd be surprised if DDR RAM appears, but if there's a move to the 166MHz MPX bus, that's about a 25% increase in CPU bandwidth to go with a 25% increase in CPU clockspeed. It's not astonishing, but it's a solid upgrade. Also, the bottom end machine is a duallie now, not a crippled single-processor runt. Who can complain that the cheap machine is now a much better value?



    And who seriously expected a PowerBook update?! There's no way that's happening until November. They got a significant revision not long ago, and the current models are sweet.



    [ 08-12-2002: Message edited by: Amorph ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 39 of 300
    toofeutoofeu Posts: 73member
    <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" /> <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" /> <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />

    I'm starting to be very tired of apple and its products, I can't believe that the specs are so low...

    the intel world is reaching the 3 ghtz barrier and we get a 1.25 processor speed for more than 3000 dollars!!

    I'll keep my old system for another 6 months.



    But this shouldn't come as a surprise, Apple knows so well how to let us down...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 40 of 300
    xypexype Posts: 672member
    actually I think a dual 867 at the bottom is great. and dual 1.25 is great, too. this is PowerPC after all, no Pentium 4 schit. I guess a dual 867 with a Radeon 9700 card would make a kick-ass machine. and if it comes in snow-white, all the better - it shines more that way.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.