New Leopard Screens

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 36
    I hope its fake, because I would never want to be able to double click a Windows '.exe' file and be able to run it without anything on Mac OS X. That would open a big door for spyware since .exe files can contain anything and you wouldnt know, where as .apps, .dmg etc. they cant install automatically and you at least can check to see whats in the package before you can commit.Please Apple dont be stupid and dont bring .exe to Mac OS X. Thank you.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 36
    kim kap solkim kap sol Posts: 2,987member
    It's also fake because nobody would simply post 2 screenshots. While the screenshots do show a few new features, there's just no very much to see. I'm sure someone that wanted to hit it big would have provided a more complete overview of Leopard.



    Also, Apple was hiring someone to overhaul Aqua (presumably so that it works well at various PPI displays (rez independence)...that Aqua UI doesn't look very revamped to me. Just looks like Tiger. Rez independence *is* coming in Leopard, there's already too many hints of it in the Safari blog and SVN change logs. So, naturally, someone that really wanted to show Leopard would have shown a screenshot of the resolution independence feature of Leopard. *That* would have been difficult to fake and would require some artistic voodoo.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 36
    FWIW, there's a third screenshot up now.



    Linky
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 36
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by chartpacs

    FWIW, there's a third screenshot up now.



    Linky



    Assuming that screenshot is real: atrocious UI on Apple's part (Vista's Explorer does this a lot better). Assuming it's fake, which seems a lot more likely: highly uncreative.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 36
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    And what's with that weird mixture of Mac OS- and Unix-style paths? "Macintosh HD/Library". It's either "/Library", or "Macintosh HD:Library". A mixture of the two? Ouch.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 36
    tednditedndi Posts: 1,921member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Dave K.

    Fake because Apple Legal hasn't taken them down.





    tru.dat
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 36
    placeboplacebo Posts: 5,767member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Chucker

    Assuming that screenshot is real: atrocious UI on Apple's part (Vista's Explorer does this a lot better). Assuming it's fake, which seems a lot more likely: highly uncreative.



    How the heck is that atrocious UI if Spotlight isn't?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 36
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Placebo

    How the heck is that atrocious UI if Spotlight isn't?



    Who said Spotlight isn't?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 29 of 36
    Let's assume this is a real screenshot of the Finder that is going to make its debut in Leopard for a second. Here's my take...



    Pros:



    - The new Finder theme looks a lot more slick than the current brushed metal theme



    - The idea of tabs and drop down folders in the toolbar is a welcome feature.



    Cons:



    - Besides tabs and drop down folders in the toolbar, the Finder appears to lack any real new features: metadata browsing, group view for all folders, a drop down arrow in the search box displaying previous searches, etc. I sure hope there is more that just isn't shown. Otherwise, it's kinda of a lackluster upgrade to the Finder.



    -----------



    On another note, where did the pill shaped button in the Finder's toolbar go? Are they planning on phasing this out or what?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 30 of 36
    davegeedavegee Posts: 2,765member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Chucker

    And what's with that weird mixture of Mac OS- and Unix-style paths? "Macintosh HD/Library". It's either "/Library", or "Macintosh HD:Library". A mixture of the two? Ouch.



    Not sure what you mean but if choose Go-->Go to Folder from the finder (in Tiger) and then type "Macintosh HD/Library" the finder takes me there just fine.



    Dave
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 36
    Quote:

    Originally posted by 1337_5L4Xx0R

    I'd pay $129 just to have no f%$#ing brushed metal!



    I use an app called Whiteout. It cleans the Finder - Yay!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 32 of 36
    bigbluebigblue Posts: 341member
    Well, the jury 's just in: it's a fake?. The guy who posted them (and made them) admitted it.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 36
    davegeedavegee Posts: 2,765member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by BigBlue

    Well, the jury 's just in: it's a fake?. The guy who posted them (and made them) admitted it.



    Sure is a good time to say "in before the ...." come on Mods don't fail me now.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 34 of 36
    jambojambo Posts: 3,036member
    Not locking just to spite DaveGee.



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 35 of 36
    davegeedavegee Posts: 2,765member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Jambo

    Not locking just to spite DaveGee.







    I love it when the mods are cranky!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 36 of 36
    murkmurk Posts: 935member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by BigBlue

    Well, the jury 's just in: it's a fake?. The guy who posted them (and made them) admitted it.



    If he lied in the first place, why would you believe him now? I'm finally convinced, they are real!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.