<strong>Of course Dfiler is probably still using a tv without a remote. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Actually, there is not a single CRT in my home <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" /> My home theater has a radio frequency remote that controls everything feeding my LCD projector. Television? Oh yeah, I remember those primative things :cool:
Yes, many, perhaps even most people have positive experiences with wireless peripherals. However, a non-insignificant percentage of wireless purchasers are unable to use the devices as intended or in a manner preferable to wired devices.
Comments
<strong>
Right now, wireless peripherals are still gaget toys. </strong><hr></blockquote>
Uh, maybe in your/Mac world but I have been using my cordless Logitech KB/MS for two years and love it.
Yawn.
<strong>Of course Dfiler is probably still using a tv without a remote. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Actually, there is not a single CRT in my home <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" /> My home theater has a radio frequency remote that controls everything feeding my LCD projector. Television? Oh yeah, I remember those primative things :cool:
Yes, many, perhaps even most people have positive experiences with wireless peripherals. However, a non-insignificant percentage of wireless purchasers are unable to use the devices as intended or in a manner preferable to wired devices.
This is why Apple doesn't go cordless.
(Thread title = "Why doesn't Apple go Cordless")