Video card options?

Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware edited January 2014
Hello all,

I'll probably be ordering a new MacPro in the next 2 weeks, heck my G4 will be 7 years old in January. I have seen all the specs for the video cards, but I don't really know how those specs impact real world performance. I plan on running 2 - 20+ monitors. I do a ton of Photoshop work, 3d modeling and vector illustration and animation - no gaming here. Whats a good video option for me? Thanks in advance?
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 23
    imacfanimacfan Posts: 444member
    Everything apart from the 3D should work fine with the standard card. As for the 3D, it depends how much it relies on the GPU or the CPU. Remember, if it is important to you, the basic card has no fan to make the machine louder.



    David
  • Reply 2 of 23
    onlookeronlooker Posts: 5,252member
    I'm guessing your thinking of getting in it as a hobbyist, or just beginning.



    My advice is stick with the base system for now. If you think you need more later then you can upgrade. There will probably be better choices available at that time anyway. But for someone to even need the ATI card in what I think is your situation, that would be your user defined option. If your situation were anything more than what I assumed you would be able to make that distinction on your own. Again no offense, but IMO the user should define the system. And it's also MO that you don't need anything more than the base graphics configuration at this time. Not until your firmly on your feet, and fully versed in your area of 3DVFX are you going to need to spend the money for it, so your best saving the extra money or putting it towards something to take you where you want to go educational wise.
  • Reply 3 of 23
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by onlooker


    Your obviously not very knowledgeable (no offense) about 3D, or system requirements for it so I'm guessing your thinking of getting in it as a hobbyist, or just beginning.



    My advice is stick with the base system for now. If you think you need more later then you can upgrade. There will probably be better choices available at that time anyway. But for someone to even need the ATI card in what I think is your situation, that would be your user defined option. If your situation were anything more than what I assumed you would be able to make that distinction on your own. Again no offense, but IMO the user should define the system. And it's also MO that you don't need anything more than the base graphics configuration at this time. Not until your firmly on your feet, and fully versed in your area of 3DVFX are you going to need to spend the money for it, so your best saving the extra money or putting it towards something to take you where you want to go educational wise.





    Could you possibly be more pretentious, pompous, condescending, and arrogant? No offense!
  • Reply 4 of 23
    The graphics card wont effect the 2d applications such as photoshop and illustrator. You will just need some extra ram if your working at high resolutions. The graphics card only comes into play in your 3d work, especially if your using something like maya or your playing games, which your not. Im sure someone could be more technical for you without being annoying to you though
  • Reply 5 of 23
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by theartguy


    Hello all,

    I'll probably be ordering a new MacPro in the next 2 weeks, heck my G4 will be 7 years old in January. I have seen all the specs for the video cards, but I don't really know how those specs impact real world performance. I plan on running 2 - 20+ monitors. I do a ton of Photoshop work, 3d modeling and vector illustration and animation - no gaming here. Whats a good video option for me? Thanks in advance?



    The 7300 is probably fine... as has been said, Photoshop and Illustrator don't use it (although I think After Effects does, so possibly Photoshp CS3 will).



    Unless you're modeling huge scenes with full textures and lots of complexity, the 7300 will be enough. Maya isn't very efficiently programmed... it didn't really seem to use the full power of my Radeon 9800 (which if I recall right is only about twice as fast), so I imagine that it's CPU bound (meaning the graphics card is sitting there waiting for Maya to catch up). Which will be doubly so, on the Intel Mac Pro. But if you really think you'll be pushing Maya, then why not go for the X1900. It's a much faster video card.



    Also, 20+ monitors is absurd. I think you can run up to 8 23", or 4 30". But you would need to get 3 extra 7300's to fill up all your PCI-e slots.
  • Reply 6 of 23
    imacfanimacfan Posts: 444member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by gregmightdothat


    Also, 20+ monitors is absurd. I think you can run up to 8 23", or 4 30". But you would need to get 3 extra 7300's to fill up all your PCI-e slots.



    I know what you mean - he confused me with that as well, but I think that he's talking about using two 20-inch or larger screens.



    David
  • Reply 7 of 23
    onlookeronlooker Posts: 5,252member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by theartguy


    Could you possibly be more pretentious, pompous, condescending, and arrogant? No offense!



    You asked for help. Is your situation any different? I had to make judgement leaps based on what little information you provided, and tried to accurately explain why. Maybe you could try giving us a better description of your situation instead of giving us almost no information about your background using those applications, or what your using them for.



    Sure my assessment may have been wrong, but I explained why I came to the conclusions that I did, and apologized for doing it when I did it.



    So fuck off.
  • Reply 8 of 23
    placeboplacebo Posts: 5,767member
    You didn't need to inform him that he was "obviously not very knowledgeable". That is neither relevant to the help he was asking for, nor news to him most likely.



    So fuck off.
  • Reply 9 of 23
    lundylundy Posts: 4,466member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by onlooker


    Your (sic) obviously not very knowledgeable



    That's a keeper. LMAO.



    I love the AI crowd.
  • Reply 10 of 23
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lundy


    I love the AI crowd.



    Ditto.
  • Reply 11 of 23
    if you want two large monitors, you need two dual-link DVIs. I'd want that for anything 23"+, just do to graphics bandwidth increases. and that means the x1900xt. the 7300gt can easily do 2 20inch monitors though, or a 20 inch and a bigger one.



    i hurt my hand and can't type, i have to hunt and peck and can't use caps
  • Reply 12 of 23
    imacfanimacfan Posts: 444member
    I'm not sure if there are any problems with bandwidth, but I'm pretty sure that the 23/24" monitors still use normal single-link DVI. If that's the case you should be fine with two on even the 7300gt.



    David
  • Reply 13 of 23
    slugheadslughead Posts: 1,169member
    I'm pretty knowledgeiaaeeable in video cards for the mac pro.



    Basically there are 3 confirmed cards

    - Nvidia 7300

    - ATI x1900

    - Nvidia Quadro



    No other card has been confirmed to work in the machine, though the x1900 for PC ($330) is rumored to work out of the box.



    The 7300 is cheap and worthless for 3d stuff, the x1900 is a hardcore gaming card, and the quadro is overpriced and should be avoided at all costs.



    Very soon, we'll have 3rd party graphics cards available for the system which will cost less than the $350 upgrade to the x1900.



    Once those options are available, I'd recommend going that route. Stay on the boards and watch what I post as I'm going to go batsh¡t nuts when these cards are confirmed.



    In the meantime, use the stock card (7300) unless you simply MUST play doom3 right away.
  • Reply 14 of 23
    onlookeronlooker Posts: 5,252member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Placebo


    You didn't need to inform him that he was "obviously not very knowledgeable". That is neither relevant to the help he was asking for, nor news to him most likely.



    So fuck off.





    For crying out loud man. Do we all need to be involved? Like I said I was making leaps in judgment based on what he wrote, and "obviously not very knowledgeable" was my first impression, and I requested, "a pardon" by saying, "no offense", and I thought explaining why I said that in that post was relevant.

    If I was just going to throw a random graphics opinion at him with out telling why, he could have just as easily came in here with a Poll topic saying "which card should I get" and gotten the whole board involved, and taken a wild stab at it, but I tried to give him an opinion on what I would recommend a person in that position should do.



    The nerve.
  • Reply 15 of 23
    slugheadslughead Posts: 1,169member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by onlooker


    For crying out loud man. Do we all need to be involved?





    Onlooker, I would like to personally state how much of an asshole you are.



    I wake up every morning and I think "damn, I really hate that 'onlooker' guy because he's such a dick."



    If there's any justice in this world, you'll die of herpes and burn in the 7th circle of hell for eternity.



    Sincerely,

    Some random guy who doesn't even know you but cares anyway for no apparent reason
  • Reply 16 of 23
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by iMacfan


    I know what you mean - he confused me with that as well, but I think that he's talking about using two 20-inch or larger screens.



    David



    Haha... that makes a lot more sense



    I thought, "20 monitors, no wonder onlooker's making a little fun of him"
  • Reply 17 of 23
    guarthoguartho Posts: 1,208member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by slughead


    I'm pretty knowledgeiaaeeable in video cards for the mac pro.



    Basically there are 3 confirmed cards

    - Nvidia 7300

    - ATI x1900

    - Nvidia Quadro





    In the meantime, use the stock card (7300) unless you simply MUST play doom3 right away.





    I played the Doom 3 demo on my iMac G5 w/ 1.5 gigs of ram and 128meg X600 w/o any noticeable lag. I think you can still play Doom 3 right away.
  • Reply 18 of 23
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by slughead


    The 7300 is cheap and worthless for 3d stuff



    The 7300 is cheap and worthless for games and Aperture, but Maya is vertex-limited rather than fill-limited. All the graphics cards are overkill as far as vertices are concerned.



    Again, I haven't used Maya on the 7300, but I imagine that it'll be the least of your worries.
  • Reply 19 of 23
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Guartho


    I played the Doom 3 demo on my iMac G5 w/ 1.5 gigs of ram and 128meg X600 w/o any noticeable lag. I think you can still play Doom 3 right away.



    But the X600 is a much better card than the 7300.
  • Reply 20 of 23
    onlookeronlooker Posts: 5,252member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by slughead


    Onlooker, I would like to personally state how much of an asshole you are.



    I wake up every morning and I think "damn, I really hate that 'onlooker' guy because he's such a dick."



    If there's any justice in this world, you'll die of herpes and burn in the 7th circle of hell for eternity.



    Sincerely,

    Some random guy who doesn't even know you but cares anyway for no apparent reason





    Thank you slughead. Without friends like you I would probably go into a deep depression, and fall back to my old life in porn. Your words give me the strength to go on, and there is no greater thanks I can give you. Unless there is something sexual I can do for you.
Sign In or Register to comment.