"Intel plotting vPro for Apple"
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09...vpro_shipping/
Until now, Apple has stayed away from Intel's marketing schemes. Not even Intel's succesful Centrino platform has found its way into Mac laptops. Things might be about to change.
Until now, Apple has stayed away from Intel's marketing schemes. Not even Intel's succesful Centrino platform has found its way into Mac laptops. Things might be about to change.
Comments
Nothing in the linked rumor piece suggests that Apple will join "Intel's marketing schemes."
Intel digital office division general manager Greg Bryant said plans were being discussed to bring the Advanced Manageability Technologies at the heart of the vPro to Apple machines.
That's exactly what I read from it.
The MacBook has all the tech from Centrino. Apple just doesn't slap "Centrino" stickers all over it because they don't need to piggyback on Intel's marketing efforts. The thing sells itself.
Your username suits you. 8)
Your username suits you. 8)
I'm hoping that's not sarcastic.
I'm hoping that's not sarcastic.
Of course not. That's my twisted way of saying I agree.
I'm hoping that's not sarcastic.
Or what?
The MacBook has all the tech from Centrino. Apple just doesn't slap "Centrino" stickers all over it because they don't need to piggyback on Intel's marketing efforts. The thing sells itself.
Doesn't the Macbook use an Atheros wireless chip?
The MacBook has all the tech from Centrino. Apple just doesn't slap "Centrino" stickers all over it because they don't need to piggyback on Intel's marketing efforts. The thing sells itself.
I thought the MacBook uses Atheros for wireless. Atheros is not part of Centrino. Apple couldn't "slap" Centrino stickers even if it wanted to.
Doesn't the Macbook use an Atheros wireless chip?
Methinks theapplegenius is not quite the genius he claims to be.
What i'm saying is that it really doesn't matter if Apple uses components from vPro, Centrino, or Viiv.
Details, details.
Doesn't the Macbook use an Atheros wireless chip?
Wasn't that part of what exposes the farce of the alleged Mackbook "hack"? How is it that Intel's wireless drivers can be at fault when Intel's wireless chip isn't in the thing?