imikejackson
About
- Username
- imikejackson
- Joined
- Visits
- 1
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 16
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 1
Reactions
-
Benchmarks show that Intel's Alder Lake chips aren't M1 Max killers
So I'll go ahead and start the flame war with the cliche, as far as price goes you are *not* comparing apples-to-apples (every pun intended). The MSI has a 17" screen so let's go ahead and actually compare the price of the MSI Raider with 17" screen as seen here (https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1639843-REG/msi_ge76_raider_11ug_054_17_3_ge76_raider_gaming.html?SID=s1643237475129c3nda52417) which costs $2485 to the 16" MacBook Pro (https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/macbook-pro/16-inch) which costs $3499. Both have 32GB of RAM and 1TB NVMe.
So maybe a correction or, god forbid, a little honesty in your reporting. Here come the bullet points:
* Been using macOS since 1988.
* Also, the 14" M1 Pro Max MacBook Pro with 32GB Ram and 1TB NVMe drive is $2800. So where are you getting your price data from?
* I don't mind the Apple Fan-boy stuff. Just try to keep it honest.
* We all know that the M1 is way more power efficient. Period. No arguments from anybody, not even Intel. That isn't my complaint about this article.