brucemc
About
- Username
- brucemc
- Joined
- Visits
- 89
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 2,049
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 1,541
Reactions
-
Worries about Apple Watch EKG false positives are inflammatory nonsense
-
Samsung confirms terrible earnings for the holiday quarter, and it will only get worse
Strange, but I did not see this information sprayed across the Internet, repeating on every news channel, along with commentary on the supposed DOOM of Samsung. Samsung Electronics is a bigger company (revenue and product line wise) than Apple, and their drop in earnings is going to be more, so how is this not front page news?
-
Apple in 2019: Will a recession ruin its run?
boltsfan17 said:tbornot said:China having a recession might just buy us another decade before the Chinese Military is ready to start a ruckus with the US and Japanese Navies. So, here’s hoping for confusion to the Emperor of China!
China currently has a couple of active ex-Soviet units, and are bringing to market their own designed ships based on those (building a 3rd carrier reportedly). Did you know that the Soviet (and current Russian) ships have ramps (curves up) at the front to launch the planes, and don't use catapults like the US navy? That is because it is much cheaper to do so. But is also means the launch weight (in terms of plane type, fuel, and ordinance) is limited. US carriers do not have this problem, and are FAR more capable in all areas as a result.
China is over estimated in the media, both economically and militarily. Yes, they are a market of almost 1.4B humans, and as such there is big $$ to be made in selling to so many (it is a desirable market), but their economy has serious problems that will become more apparent in the next 20 years. First is that the population as a whole is rapidly aging, due to their very low birth rate and almost no immigration. 25% of the population is estimated to be over 65 by 2030, up from 13% not that long ago. Their workforce in total numbers is already shrinking. There are 30M *less* women than men due to the one child policy and family bias. Macro trends are not in their favour. Secondly they also have a very state led economy, which tends to be less innovative and flexible. Third is the continual erosion of civil liberties (it is getting more controlled, watched, and cut off from the rest of the world) which is unlikely to be economically positive.
If I am Taiwan or the Philippines, I can see being nervous. Not if I was the USA. -
Apple in 2019: Will a recession ruin its run?
I quite like the USB-C connector (which is just the connector, the port of course supports T-Bolt 3, audio/video, power, etc). I purchased a USB-C hub for $40 on Amazon which connects to all my peripherals at work, including the power cable. One single attachment point, and you are done. I did have to spend about $100 for all the peripherals, but I needed some for my last 2011 MBP as well.
Always funny to read the comments - you get the people that complain about Apple protecting legacy markets (I guess that is to imply trying to maintain the iPhone user base), and then the same ones turnaround and moan that the Mac doesn't have enough legacy ports. Oh well, that is humanity I guess... -
Editorial: Could Apple's lock on premium luxury be eclipsed by an era of good-enough gear?...
mikethemartian said:bb-15 said:Imagine a company looking through your mail, tracking where you go & what you buy to send advertising to you. In the past that would have been intolerable.
But that is what Google does. It mines data on its apps, ties it to the user and uses that data to send individualized ads to the customer.
This is how Google makes most of its money.https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/020515/business-google.asp
I minimize that kind of data tracking as much as possible & part of how I do that is to carefully use Apple products to reduce data tracking for ads.
In addition, Apple has top notch customer service & devices which have OS support/updates for many years.
The Apple ecosystem works well across its devices.
Apple products by & large are simple to use & yet are very powerful.
For all those things which benefit me, I’m willing to pay a reasonable amount more.
Company B does none of these things, keeps much of its data only for 6 months, invests in methods to anonymize data, and actively promotes privacy and security.
But, maybe in the future Company B will change their mind. Therefore Company B really is no better than Company A... -
Citi reduces AAPL target to $200, because 'trade wars are bad for tech stocks'
kruegdude said:brucemc said:Apple is a bad investment. Please sell your shares. -
iPhone 11: How Apple makes tech of the future affordable
hammeroftruth said:bc2009 said:Kinda hard to make the argument that the iPhone 11 is better in every way than the iPhone X when it still does not have some features of iPhone X (including an OLED screen and a 2x zoom lens). Also, you repeatedly say the price of iPhone 11 is $650 when it is really $699.
iPhone 11 is a great value for all the technology you get (just like iPhone XR was last year), but an article that repeatedly harps on how others were wrong should get some basic things right (including the grammar in the title).
This article reads like a diatribe from somebody who can't wait to say "I told you so" to the whole internet and then proceeded to hastily pound the keyboard as fast they could.
I don’t remember the writer of Roughly Drafted turning a blind eye to Apple’s shortcomings.
The reality is right now, there aren’t a lot of people who will be willing to pay $1k for a smartphone, whether it’s Apple or Samsung. Just read some of the comments on sites that are reviewing the Samsung Note 10, especially the 5G version.
Apple had to do something to get more people to upgrade rather than hold on to their devices even longer. Dropping the price of the iPhone 11 $50 cheaper than the XR was a start, including a free year of Apple TV+ family helps, but there are still plenty of iPhone users who are not loyal to Apple and this is what affects the bottom line.
In the days days before the iPhone, Apple loyalists were the ones keeping Apple profitable, and in turn Apple made products we loved.
Once the iPhone was released, people
who never bought anything Apple were flashing their devices around as if they were a status symbol of their wealth, taste or intelligence. It’s popularity was it’s attraction, not it’s ease of use, or how powerful it can be.
Apple was addicted to the attention and started releasing more and more products that while were still attractive to Apple loyalists, they also had things that they didn’t like about them, like soldered memory and hard drives and plenty of quality programs that dealt with issues that Apple should have predicted. It didn’t affect sales, Apple was like a bear catching salmon during spawning season, it just can’t miss.
Now, people are still weary of trusting Apple after that stupid battery replacement program.
They don’t want to upgrade for 1k or even $700. You can try to spin it and give the customer the monthly cost because that’s more palatable, but customers are not stupid. They played that game already with the carriers.
There are millions of iphone users who don’t really use their device to its potential and they are realizing that. This is why they are willing to abandon Apple and buy a cheap android phone.
So now Apple has to win their business all over again. Apple retail isn’t prepared to explain why an iPhone is better than other devices. They don’t have Apple loyalists as employees anymore, they have more people who think it’s cool to work there but don’t know enough about Apple products. -
Apple TV+ launches on November 1, for $4.99 per month
Great pricing (for this and Arcade) - Apple is clearly playing the ecosystem game:
- Get people into the Apple TV app to watch this content plus sign up there for other subscriptions.
- More people and subscriptions in Apple TV app gives Apple leverage to pull more services in to offer it
- Make Apple TV app THE prime way to subscribe and access content.
Apple is introducing content over the course of many months (maybe throughout 12 months), so they are going to keep people interested and not likely to cancel (for those not buying new Apple h/w who would get it for free). I read that Apple isn't likely to make all episodes available right away (like Netflix), but might do something like 3 episodes right away and then remainder introduced each week. This is important to stop the churn of "sign-up to binge watch Stranger Things and other titles and then cancel".
Apple's ecosystem was greatly strengthened today... -
Apple debuts $249 AirPods Pro with active noise cancellation
potatoman said:I bet the colours are coming as a refresh to the original, ‘cheaper’ AirPods. They are rumoured to be refreshed too, and Apple have a history of selling the cheaper products in the line up in different colours (iPod mini/nano/shuffle, iPhone 5C/XR/11). It allows the more expensive model to be marketed as premium, while the cheaper product appeals to its own market. In this case, they could get a second (or third) breath of life out of the original AirPods.
Seriously though, if they offered the classic AirPods in the iPhone XR and 11 colours, just before the holiday season, they would sell LIKE CRAZY. -
Apple cuts prices on USB-C & Thunderbolt 3 gear in response to MacBook Pro backlash
digitol said:Nice, but not even close to good enough. Sounds like there is a serious problem with the new macbook pros. I have never had schiller & Co., come out and be so vocal about a product launch. I smell fear, and desperation. They say best sales ever, I think the internet proves otherwise: See what all the other big name longtime pro mac users are saying -
http://mjtsai.com/blog/2016/10/27/new-macbook-pros-and-the-state-of-the-mac/