cookies
About
- Username
- cookies
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 61
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally posted by RussS Wow. It looks right, at least.
-
Quote: Originally posted by RussS After seeing the previous scores I can't believe my results are for real but here's what I got: Total time 45. Score is 108.804788989531 QS 933Mhz Maxtor 120GB HD ??? The BSD subsystem must have bee…
-
I think I'm going to skip on the graphics tests, unless someone else has an idea. It depends a great deal on the programming technique and algorithms used, and I'm not very interested in evaluating computer performance by forcing all computers to ru…
-
This should be a fairly good memory/processor test. The test is based on two programs which merely create output and "flow" output at an extremely large rate. 1 GB is produced in all, which may be soon be too little for accurate tests of computer ha…
-
RAM for that computer is already < $100 for 512 MB. Just got it in a catalog today (Mac Zone). However, it is subject to "changes, so please call." http://www.maczone.com/cgi-bin/zones...l?id=000801422 The same item in the catalog is $99.99…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Fluffy All of my runs. Total time 130. Score is 45.4937356699112 Total time 114. Score is 53.6087437531454 Total time 125. Score is 47.8881278986832 Total time 116. Score is 52.5200494665448 Hmm, seems incons…
-
Quote: Originally posted by chych Hmm just for kicks I tried running it on a RAM disk: Hey, cool. I didn't think about that. Maybe this would make a good RAM and general system test, too. I wonder whether it would need adjustment, however. …
-
This test tries to avoid virtual performance enhancements which are present in the operating system. Perhaps it would be interesting to see how another test would work which allowed the computer to cache files and perform delayed read/write operatio…
-
Quote: Originally posted by CubeDude Wait, how did I get about the same score as 1.25Ghz DP G4? This test depends almost none on what kind of processor the computer uses, but it is very interesting to see how the actual results come in. Pr…
-
Here's my score for a 333 Mhz, tray-loading iMac, with a new 40 GB Seagate Barracuda IV HD. Total time 175. Score is 28.672480406192 And here's a link to the detailed log from the program: http://www.myersdaily.org/joseph/ref...-tests.out.l…
-
Thanks, guys! I'm actually surprised anyone helps after the initial negative response.
-
Everything should work now, and the MD5 sum has been updated. in regards to disk fullness: a complete performance evaluation needs a test of performance under many parameters. It is up to a tester to enjoy the speed of their machine and submit th…
-
Oops, the program needs a configuration fix for another kind of hardware. Sorry. Don't test until I fix it.
-
Quote: Originally posted by thuh Freak what does makin it urself give you (besides the satisfaction of building such a huge thing)? There are always differences.
-
Quote: Originally posted by hmurchison Don't count on it. How many people have 4 SATA drives. I need 10 drives, plus NAS.
-
sure, out on 19th, I heard.
-
Quote: Originally posted by Luca Rescigno I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to say Lol, you are very funny.
-
Quote: Originally posted by AirSluf Those high priced cards are borderline fraudulent rip-offs. What do they have? I like the 5200 a lot.
-
Oh, I just noticed something. The other drives were only ATA-100. Doesn't it seem odd that S-ATA would be slower? Maybe the system setup was the real reason.
-
Thanks for lots of helpful info. I just thought you were saying that Seagate was really bad. Good point that it is quiet. How much was your Barracuda V? BTW, est. price on the WD1200JB is $379 (120 GB). I guess the Seagate looks like $199 (120 GB). …