fishdoc
About
- Username
- fishdoc
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 189
Reactions
Comments
-
Actually, I was not defending Groverat (at least not as the main point of my post), but I suppose I was being overly subtle/opaque. My point was that arguing that agreeing with the ACLU meant agreeing with NAMBLA is ridiculous. It is the moral e…
-
Yeah! Why do you hate America, Groverat? And children? Fish \\wishing there was a sarcastic font
-
"Big deal. Little children of Polynesian descent, used to get their baptism of fire at a very early age, swimming with fully grown sharks. ( no safety grill folks, just the belief that if you stare at a shark, it will not attack you)" Without wei…
-
For god's sake, jimmac, stop the madness....his OWN links (which he says are just some of many) not only don't support his contention, but refute it. And when called on it, he says that he knew you would respond that way, and that you should have f…
-
well, Landover Baptist is most definitely a parody site (some friends bought my wife one of the "whay would jesus do?" thongs last year from them). So, linking to them makes me fairly convinced this other site is parody as well (or run by really …
-
I agree, but think that is not really the issue here, for 2 reasons. 1. There are numerous brutal regimes in countries around the world that are as bad or worse than Iraq's was. Why are we not fighting wars there? Is that the role you advocate …
-
Dude, you gotta just give up with spunk...next he is gonna ask that you go to the sites and read them for him. It is pretty clear he has no interest in finding out what the truth is, just trying to "win" the argument (which doesn't work so well eit…
-
so, based on the site name you know they have no credible info? I am afraid that is PRECISELY the analogy. Institute for Creation Research? The name of the site speaks for itself - I do not need to see it to rebut what it says - they have an ag…
-
Well, spunk, I guess that demonstrates why it is a waste of time to argue with you. If you want to have a reasonable debatre about something, you have to be willing to actually debate. But if you refuse to even look at their sources before dismissi…
-
"I really don't care to patronize your propaganda sites. They can increase their counter clicks without me. I already know these kind of numbers are grossly inflated. Like the 5000 claimed killed in the Israeli operation in Jenin. When in reality it…
-
read your own quote from the report..."we have confidence"...not "we have proof that". or "we can demonstrate that", just "we are confident. And 1000 km does not include the US, true? I see I am wasting my time here...enjoy your worldview! …
-
The stement I quoted above is a statement of fact - read Kay's own words if you need to http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affair..._10022003.html Of course, I have seen how you refuse to accept anything that does not fit with your world view, so I…
-
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/26/opinion/26FRI2.html
-
From the NYTimes Dec 26: The surprise in his first report was not the revelation that no actual weapons of mass destruction had been found. That was obvious from daily news reports. Rather it was the team's judgment that Iraq did not even have ac…
-
I guess arguing with you about this really is a waste of my time. I posted your (inaccurate) quote, but still you insist you weren't wrong. What else can I say? Other than Franken specifically says his book is not all facts, and if the best you …
-
"pierr_alex my ASS. Post using your real name, you pussy" Nice. Name-calling by one of the mods.
-
Very interesting trumptman.... 1. You specifically said "Franken is just a liar for calling the 10 ppb a rollback". So, ok...you are wrong there. 2. You yourself referred to Bush's actions as a "stay" on the arsenic law (see page one of this…
-
Amusingly, the reference you finally found in the book does NOT make the claim that Bush "reversed" anything, but explicitly states that Bush "delayed" the rule going into effect (which is exactly what happened). So - willing to admit you were wr…
-
Anecdotal evidence of the job market (with an "n" of one) is useless. As for the Paul Krugman/Enron connection....read this for Krugman's take on it...besides which, I am not certain how that would be relevant to the discussion at hand anyway. …
-
Wow...you know what Franken said, what he didn't say, and even his intention behind what he said, and yet you seem surprised that those who cannot find the statements want you to back it up? Amazing. FWIW, I read (and enjoyed) Franken's book, an…