dabe
About
- Username
- dabe
- Joined
- Visits
- 9
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 4
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 99
Reactions
Comments
-
hjb wrote: » I read that whole document what you called "copycat document". IMO, that is not a copycat document. That is a competitive analysis with a trend leading product or design. Basically all companies do this. Have you seen that…
-
abeliefsystem wrote: » Strangely it was Samsung tech that gave us the iPhone and iPod. Samsungs fault was not 100% staying the slave. On the contrary, their fault was stealing. They are admitted thieves of intellectual property.
-
gatorguy wrote: » In what way was Google hypocritical? Their argument on de-facto standards might not be legally supportable but I don't see the hypocrisy. In the context of "Don't be evil," what could be more hypocritical?
-
ericthehalfbee wrote: » You want to know another good one? Try to find an original PDF user manual for the Neonode n1m (the phone Apple haters claim is prior art for slide to unlock). They have all been removed, even from Neonodes own support s…
-
cnocbui wrote: » You have to wonder why didn't DED just correct these erring articles if it is so important. Rubbish. This observation makes absolutely no sense when you consider that the article is part of a series in which the Wikipedia discu…
-
Mikey, please correct your grammar! It's "while lying on an inductive charging pad," not "while laying on an inductive charging pad." Unless the device is a chicken, it's not laying anything. Common sort of mistake, but we tend to expect profession…
-
cnocbui wrote: » You are wrong. Queen Elizabeth II, Nov 1972: "I think that everybody really will concede that on this, of all days, I should begin my speech with the words 'My husband and I'". Obviously, if one is beginning the speec…
-
You are wrong. Queen Elizabeth II, Nov 1972: "I think that everybody really will concede that on this, of all days, I should begin my speech with the words 'My husband and I'". Obviously, if one is beginning the speech with "My husband and I," …
-
Wow, it's truly amazing that you even have to ask!! Proper grammar, whether American or British English, would dictate "... Christopher and me" in this sentence, not Christopher and I.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DrDoppio The image does not simplify the process nor does it make more efficient, so the lightbulb and sleeve analogy is moot. The innovation is marginally useful, obvious, and arguably novel (just about any GUI ele…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DrDoppio In this particular case, a groundbreaking touch interface was invented and marketed by Neonode years before Apple applied for and was unjustly granted a related patent. No analogy is perfect, but here's a s…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DrDoppio A swipe with a finger is a swipe with a finger, with or without pictures or fairy tales. Exactly, which is why Apple is not attempting to patent "a swipe with a finger." As a reminder, this is the title …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DrDoppio Finally, if the image is dispensable, then it isn't essential for the method to work. The answer to question 4 is thus no. The patent application has been worded so that it emphasizes on a superfluous detail a…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DrDoppio The only way to prove that my questions do not enlighten the issue is to answer them. Then we would see. On the other hand, the only way to prove that your questions do enlighten the issue is to first answe…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DrDoppio You are avoiding the central issue. Those are really simple questions. For the last time... The central issue is whether or not Apple has introduced a non-obvious, useful, and novel innovation. Your s…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DrDoppio You didn't answer any of my questions. Correct. It's easy to get sidetracked by hypotheticals. I'm more interested in looking at the central issue.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DrDoppio The gesture is exactly the same no matter what meaning you prescribe to it. Clearly Apple was not attempting to patent the left-to-right finger movement/gesture, and the USPTO was apparently able to figure …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DrDoppio The gesture is exactly the same no matter what meaning you prescribe to it. Clearly Apple was not attempting to patent the left-to-right finger movement/gesture, and the USPTO was apparently able to figure …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DrDoppio The bottomline is, the gesture was there many years before Apple filed to patent it, and therefore is unpatentable due to lack of novelty. Again you fail to understand that Apple is not patenting a left-to-…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by spovat Apple saw this METHOD and patented it. It MAY be true that they saw this first. If so, they certainly didn't patent what they saw. If you think otherwise, you need to look at the video again and then consider…