tooltalk
About
- Banned
- Username
- tooltalk
- Joined
- Visits
- 2
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- -2
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 766
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by leighr This whole case is startling to smell of a corrupt judge with a Samsung galaxy in his back pocket. I think Judge Birss said he has an iPad. ... So this case is all about, and only about…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Daekwan You are absolutely right! That $1 Billion dollar settlement definitely taught Samsung a lesson. but Samsung was never sanctioned for "lack of integrity." As for $1B, I gues…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Prima Kingu And Samsung has already bumped up the price of Apple’s processors by 20% http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-processor-price-bump-130419/ The article says the contract doesn't e…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Rayz Very true. Look at the way Samsung got away with leaking documents to the press when Judge Koh told them that they were not admissible as evidence. Hang on a moment. In …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Rayz No, he's not. This is not about the design of the iPad. Samsung went to court to get a ruling that they had not copied one of earlier Apple's designs. This was not the design for any shipping iP…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Galbi Arrogance back fired. Lesson learned. Well, not sure if Apple learned anything from this.. I was hoping Apple would go all the way with their bold non-compliance and make a mocker…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by souliisoul Please do your homework and read about the Korean mafia and Samsung's links to this group. You native or just unaware of current events. naive? There is no organized criminal…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Kr00 And this is how mature, professional businessmen work things out, unlike the egotistical mafia like goons in korea. Samscum think that because they can get away with bribing judges and buying favours f…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Slurpy Please someone reassure me that I'm not a fucking idiot for FINALLY deciding to invest in Apple @ $640/share, after reading all "it's gonna hit 1000" pieces. It has nose-dived since, for seemingly no…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ericblr The Galaxy S3 is also very crash prone. I know several people with galaxy's and they are all having a random reboot issue. It's also all over the web. I like android as well as ios but the galaxy s3 …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by pedromartins I guess, I should expect TS to remove this post as well?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by EricTheHalfBee Hey Tool, haven't you heard? Their semiconductor business is down. Looks like their mobile business gains haven't been enough to make up for the loss of component sales to other custome…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Rot'nApple "The growing reports could represent a concern on the part of Samsung that its chipmaking business will not grow as much as expected, with the potential loss of Apple as a major customer." But …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Eluard Because it's FRAND — and non-discriminatory means just what it says. Oh yeah ROFL…Because when trolls appear here, that is what their arguments always amount to. Non-discrim…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 The license fee was paid, it formed part of the cost Apple paid in buying the chips that use Motorola's patents. That is called patent exhaustion, which is the subject of another case…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 No because the license agreements Motorola had in place with Infineon and Qualcomm said so. No, Infineon or Qualcomm can't dictate how much Motorola charges its own customers.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 Wrong. Motorola initiated legal action against Apple, actions that Google has shown a keen interest in continuing despite the total disregard for upholding the standards setting proce…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Eluard Is $1.00 per device not the reasonable FRAND rate that Apple's competitors are being charged? Why would Apple agree to allow a judge to charge them whatever she felt like. That would be insane. Apple…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 So are Motorola using any of Apple's LTE patents? Then there are Apple's H.264 patents licensed by MPEG-LA. Samsung and Google's disregard for existing licences with chip ma…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Eluard This is quite bizarre. Why would a judge act like this? http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2012110322254380 From the judge's order: ...Apple states that it will not commit …