tooltalk
About
- Banned
- Username
- tooltalk
- Joined
- Visits
- 2
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- -2
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 766
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ThePixelDoc You can't be serious. Probably the stupidest assumption about Samsung I have ever read. So now Samsung and all of the other Android manufacturers are trying to be our buddies and look after our expens…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jungmark You better look that up yourself. The first 6 points on the x axis have the same interval then suddenly it doubles then goes up by 50%, then go up by 33%. @jungmark : yes, that's how this particular log …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by basjhj Hilarious, these Samsung shills. That graph is deceiving, because of the scale (or lack thereof) of the x-axis. The 'predicted' price of the S5 is expected to trade at 70% of its original price at 6 months, whe…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by sog35 WRONG. Samsung never said the S3, S4, or S5 had a supply issue. They said the S6 Edge did. It makes ZERO sense for them to lower the price if the demand was higher than the supply. Another case of Sams…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by sog35 Nice graph. But the point is this: Analysist and Samsung was saying the Galaxy S6 Edge was selling like gangbusters and the only reason they sold less was because supply shortage. But the $100 price dro…
-
I guess people just hear what they want to hear. So where is the evidence that the price reduction has nothing to do with the historical competitive market pricing, all to do with their recent below-expected earning? It seems fairly clear that the…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jungmark Are the design patents only being challenged here? Pretty sure the utility patents are a major component of the suit. Easy, FRAND is fair and reasonable and non discriminatory. You shouldnt be able to char…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jungmark There's a difference between FRAND and non FRAND patents. Typical troll response. If Apple's design patents were so trivial, why didn't the major players come up with them first? Difference between FRAND …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Anome Lot of software companies in that brief. Clearly they feel it has implications beyond the manufacture of phones. And Newegg...not clear what their interest is. @anome : Well, NewEgg's been busy fighting pa…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by cali So a bunch of tech companies are defending a Korean knock off manufacturer. ?!!! I thought Apple and Facebook were friends? Does this mean Apple is becoming a more intimidating tech company?? @cali : Su…
-
Corrections wrote: » If the law "explicitly authorizes the award of total profit from the article of manufacture bearing the patented design," following the statue does not "set a dangerous precedent." In 1990 Polaroid prevailed in its 14 year …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by boredumb That's funny...you'd think protecting patent integrity would encourage and promote innovation, not stifle it. Maybe they meant to say "stifle our ability to copy what we can't create for ourselves"...? Must…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mike1 Must be time for Samsung to run some ads that make fun of Apple customers. That's always a good way to make make customers convert. Based on the sales reports I've seen over the last few months. Apple's forec…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by monstrosity I disagree that Appleinsider is "Apple Biased" I think they review objectively, and give credit where credit is due. It's just that seldom does the competition deserve credit, as they usually create co…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by FreeRange And what planet are you living on? Samsung documents submitted in court clearly showed that they set out to copy the iPhone, in just a matter of weeks, as closely as they possibly could so stop your twitst…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by dasanman69 Pressing their luck Samsung is. @dasanman69 : Well, it's either this or SCOTUS. Samsung does have a fairly good case here and, if Samsung prevails, it's also likely to defend and benefit Apple in the l…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jungmark Not cheap plastic at all. I wonder how other plastic phones would do ? This is nothing new. I'm guessing Apple,Samsung, HTC, and Nokia phones must have saved at least dozen by now: "According to 9to5…
-
Quote:Originally Posted by fallenjt WRONG. Chinese phone makers competed at the bottom which wouldn't hurt Samsung that much financially. iPhone actually hurt them in the premium segment. Look at China market shares in Q1 2015, you can tell more t…
-
brakken wrote: » http://iphone.appleinsider.com/articles/13/11/13/samsung-no-disputing-we-sold-apples-property-and-owe-a-huge-sum-of-money http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung_Electronics_Co. Samsung is disgusting. Like I sa…