tooltalk
About
- Banned
- Username
- tooltalk
- Joined
- Visits
- 2
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- -2
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 766
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tmay Ericsson filed in Eastern Texas. Apple filed in the Northern District of California. What is the District of Eastern Texas noted for? @tmay : not sure what you mean, Apple routinely used the Dusseldorf…
-
Just checked Kantar's stats, which contradict the title of this article : Android's share increased and iOS lost marketshare in all 5-EUs. The only notables markets where iOS made gain are China, Argentina and Mexico. 3e Jan 2015 3e Mar …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by sog35 Samsung makes ZERO on feature phones. So how the HELL does low feature phone sales = 40% less profits? They just dont want to admit that Apple is destroying Samsung. @sog35: I think we've been through t…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by leavingthebigG @tooltalk thanks for the correction. TMSC did not sue Samsung as I had stated. After reading an article to remind myself of the "facts", I still hope TSMC wins the lawsuit in an effort to put fear int…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by leavingthebigG TSMC has sued Samsung for theft. Go figure. @leavingthebigG : TSMC never sued Samsung. TSMC sued a former TSMC employee, Liang Mong-song, who left the company almost 6 years ago for his breachin…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by konqerror Sure you can. Called Common Platform. Just tell TSMC to be unofficially Common Platform compliant. Samsung already copied TSMC's 14 nm process, why can't TSMC? @konqerror: eh? Common Platform is long …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Blastdoor I seem to recall a report/rumor that Apple tried to make such an investment, but TSMC rebuffed it, saying that they had the capital necessary for making the necessary investments. It's hard to know wh…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jameskatt2 1. Selling controller chips makes hardly any profit. So Apple won't do so. Keeping controller chips for itself so Apple can add value to its high priced and high profit products makes far more sense. Appl…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Cpsro Q: Why did Samsung request the patent review instead of Apple? A: In its agreement to supply Apple with flash storage, Samsung may have also agreed to indemnify Apple for any liability over patent infringement. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by leavingthebigG I gave you an example of at least one Samsung division making dramatic changes to cater to Apple's needs. So, it is within the realm of possibility another Samsung division would offer Apple a discoun…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by leavingthebigG I am not certain this is true. According to an article published on March 30, 2015, by the Korea IT News, Samsung has created a display specifically to cater to Apple's needs. The article is titled, "…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ECats A tip from my production history. It's far too late in the game to be talking about yield for a basic/core component such as screens. Those issues would have been worked out long ago - additionally this is no…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TheWhiteFalcon Isn't LG the maker of the flexble OLED panels? Or has Samsung stolen that too now? @thewhitebeaner : Samsung is pretty much the only game in mobile OLED display biz and has been pretty much from the …
-
[QUOTE name="DavidW" url="/t/185054/judges-skeptical-apple-suffered-irreparable-harm-from-samsung-patent-infringement/40#post_2685933"] The difference being that the injunction against Apple was based on a disagreement of the licensing of patents…
-
a minor correction : "Why are you fighting it?" Moore asked Apple. "Why am I wasting my time?" Moore asked Samsung, not Apple.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tmay I've probably co-mingled the Motorola / Apple and Motorola / Microsoft cases; http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/05/us-microsoft-google-trial-idUSBRE98401B20130905 I apologise; I was going off memory. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tmay You are arguing two very different cases, and they are not equivalent as one case is FRAND and the other Non SEP, in this case the UI. Apple was arguing that its UI patents (slide to unlock) create a marketable…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tmay You might remember that Samsung was getting sued for copying Apple's UI, and Ericsson is providing RF IP that is embedded in a device that can be sold as a smallest saleable unit, an electronic component. Now it …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tmay So you find that fair, but Apple does not. Hence, Apple getting the court to determine the basis in a more equitable way. The case isn't primarily about Apple trying to avoid licensing fees, just a reduction in…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Mazda 3s It's pretty simple actually... click bait?