mcdark
About
- Username
- mcdark
- Joined
- Visits
- 4
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 6
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 28
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Macky the Macky The NeXT iPhone will be called the iPhone 4SJ. You heard it here first! Nah! It'll be called 'The New iPhone'.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Apple and I seem to think that's the wrong real estate. Well I would say extra realestate is better than no extra realestate.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Indeed, so another question: what's the point of a 16:9 screen on a phone? What purpose does it serve? Already explained. It offers the potential for extra screen realestate that would not be possible …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil I think 16:9 on a phone is about as silly as 16:9 on a tablet. Phones and tablets are fundamentally different. For a tablet, it doesn't really matter if it's 5" or 6" wide, so it's not an issue to adop…
-
A few theoretical stats, assuming they keep the 2:3 aspect ratio and can't do too much about the bezel size: If the iPhone was the same width as a Galaxy S2, it would have a 3.8" screen. If the iPhone was the same width as a Galaxy Nexus, it would h…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by 11thIndian I think they're fine with it. The ONLY feature which benefits from 16:9 directly is movie watching, and that assumes the content you're watching isn't 4:3 or 2.35:1. For every other task- web browsing, boo…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by nicolbolas I believe if Apple DOES change the screen rez, it will go to the iPads 4:3 ratio. but yes, black bars are bad and Apple probably will stick 3:2. No, going 4:3 aspect ratio would be even worse than 3:2.…
-
It's okay talking about which diagonal screen size is ideal and how it compares to the big Android phones out there, but there's one big difference; the aspect ratio. Apple have settled on 3:2 for all their iDevices. Everyone else has settled on…