kharvel
About
- Username
- kharvel
- Joined
- Visits
- 11
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 32
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 80
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Haggar The enterprise is not our customer. Steve Jobs What Steve Jobs really meant: The enterprise is not our primary customer. That's why Apple partnered with IBM to provide enterprise-grade and enterpris…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gwydion At least, you should read your own links before saying that others don't understand. Trial has not started, patent will be subject to trial, Samsung can try to use invalidity defense in the trial. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by gwmac These lawsuits don't seem to be going anywhere. It looks like Samsung will have to pay Apple a pittance and will be allowed to continue operating pretty much without many changes. I think the biggest threat to A…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gwydion So, you have only found just one claim of one patent and the trial has not even started? You do not understand the significance of the pre-trial summary judgement of patent infringement in the SECOND trial…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gwydion And exactly what key patents infringes GMS? Here is one example: http://www.fosspatents.com/2014/01/us-court-finds-samsung-to-infringe-one.html The Auto-correct feature is found in the GMS but not in …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by gwmac You are absolutely correct but if Samsung decided to fork Android like Amazon then they would no longer be permitted to sell "Android" phones. That is a huge incentive not to fork it. This incentive is bein…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by macaholic_1948 Technically speaking, Google was not a party to the trial and, thus, whether or not Android itself infringed directly was not at issue. Samsung's modifications to Android were was clearly at issue. …
-
One important thing folks should not overlook: Android infringes on patented Apple technologies. We know that from the $1 billion Samsung v. Apple verdict (in which similar damages have been imposed by two different juries!) as well as the recen…
-
I'm just wondering - aren't any court wins for Oracle against Google at this point just pyrrhic victories? Google already had years to milk the profits out of Android and as someone pointed out, Google has been working on moving Android to a platfo…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by 3Eleven I see posts like this and often wonder what the heck you were using for a phone. My first smartphone was a Droid X by Motorola when it was first released back in 2010. The iPhone wasn't an option as I was on …
-
I was just wondering - doesn't Amazon run the risk of being sued by Apple for infringing on the Steve Jobs multitouch patents on the Kindle HDX devices?
-
Steve Jobs was alive when Apple bid for the Nortel portfolio as part of the Rockstar consortium. That means that he spent $2.6 billion of Apple's cash to acquire the weapons for the thermonuclear war that he promised. He probably got Tim Cook to …
-
So how exactly will this service avoid email spoofing fraud? Suppose I sign up for the service and verify/authenticate my email and send payments to people. Then one day, some hacker comes into the picture and spoofs my email address and sends mo…
-
Prediction/Rumor: Apple is rushing the Golden Master of 10.9 out quickly because it wants to announce the Mac Pro pricing and availability this week or early next week. Apple will also announce updates to the MacBook Pro line this week in tandem …
-
tbell wrote: » But what about a factory unlocked 5S or a T-Mobile unlocked 5S? Wouldn't that work on the Sprint CDMA or LTE network given that it is not only GSM unlocked but is also presumably CDMA unlocked (since it supports all frequencies…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Apple ][ I see. I suppose that maybe there's no point in having one, as I said in my first post, but I wasn't aware that there was no such a thing. So why would somebody buy the $550 iPhone from Sprint then? Just…
-
Now we know where Google copied the Google Glass concept from.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Anome That's not quite true. Be and NeXT both failed selling their own hardware, and transitioned to selling their OSes to run on "Wintel" hardware, where they eventually died. (Until Apple bought NeXT, of course.) T…
-
gatorguy wrote: » Not going to derail the conversation here even further but no court or even US Trade Representative has said injunctions for SEP infringement aren't permitted. A court already said that. See Microsoft vs. Motorola case decide…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy That was the ITC Judge wasn't it? The case where US Trade Rep overturned the ITC import ban saying they couldn't bar old Apple devices even tho infringement was identified. ITC Judge != U.S. COURT. St…