alvarezluis
About
- Username
- alvarezluis
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 42
Reactions
Comments
-
No ref? Why isn't that surprising...
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil You're several days behind the times. Ref? Quote: Also behind the fix. This isn't even an issue at all. Ref?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil And with that I disagree on the face of it. By 'premier', do you mean primary? I agree with that. Yes, primary. My bad. Quote: But again, it's moot since SSDs will be fine. That's circular…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil SSDs put us at the mercy of cloud operators? No. SSDs – as that article points out – won't be able to deliver after 2024. You say that is no problem, because we (will) have (i)Cloud storage. I say y…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil This won't happen. Are you a shill for the spinning hard drive lobby? You seem irrationally against absolutely every future technology that looks to supplant it. No, not against "every technology that l…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil It's illegal That's never stopped big corporations. So they get their lobbyists, their Congressmen, and their Senators to change the law. Or they simply stop the free iCloud service, citing whatever exc…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil iCloud is free. Yes, as free as your first few coke snorts But once you've got your data up there, have come to rely on it, and the 'free alternatives' are sued out of existence you will pay through th…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil iCloud's going to be sued? Huh. Maybe Apple shouldn't have done it, then. No, Apple('s iCloud) is going to be doing the sueing (together with Amazon, Microsoft, and other big cloud operators; i.o.w. a k…
-
Dream on: there won't be any 'free alternatives' as 'they' are (trying to) sueing those out of existence with ACTA, SOPA, PIPA, etc. etc.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil While I share your sentiment here (and some of your concern), I don't agree with your overarching implication (being that the only means by which anyone should be storing data in the future is local, spinn…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by AlvarezLuis Yeah, and you probably believe in the bible too. SSD technology was conceived in the mid-seventies. So it took 30+ years to develop into a (little bit) commercially viable proposition (it's still faaar …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Your implication is that tech won't change between now and then, and I don't buy that. Eventually we'll have different types of solid state storage than NAND, and many of the concerns with modern drives wo…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Marvin the latencies only doubled. "Only" doubled? Do you have any idea how that exponentially increases read/write errors on a 4TB drive into the zillions?
-
You must have been under some rock then.
-
Even if it had been 'only' a dozen times your 'explanation' still doesn't make sense: they would have decided after 1 or 2 times that it didn't work for them, and stopped doing it. But they didn't. They kept going. They launched – LIVE – all of the …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Because they don't do that. Huh? Where did you get that idea? I've seen Jobs do it ? live ? dozens of times. Especially in this century! The last time he did it he announced the 4S like that! Or have y…