jfc1138
About
- Username
- jfc1138
- Joined
- Visits
- 24
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 668
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 3,090
Reactions
Comments
-
Lining up to be some interesting products for me this Spring. Fun stuff.
-
"Speaking in front of a Congressional intelligence panel, FBI Director James Comey admitted that the outcome of an Apple-FBI battle over unlocking an iPhone will likely set a legal precedent, despite recent suggestions to the contrary." "Suggesti…
-
photoshop59 said: sog35 said: Unreal how ignorant these guys are about technology and the constitution. You are the ignorant one. This is a matter that all candidates agree must be resolved by courts, or by legislation. There is …
-
ttollerton said: We do need to get this figured out, but because we're having the debate after an extremely horrific event that draws out heavy emotions, the debate is unlikely to be civil and objective. The Constitution DOES guarantee pri…
-
So he's finally admitted to lying all this time on this? Guy should get fired immediately. He told that to Congress right? Lying to Congress is a crime. Jail him now.
-
Hmmm. Tempting.
-
vaughnv said: I know nothing about encryption, but I can can think in general terms. Is it not possible for the FBI to turn the phone over to Apple and let them privately and secretly break the encryption on the phone (holding the pass code …
-
Attaeus said: And I have said from the beginning that the FBI has no real plenary authority here. The suspects are dead, the crime is done, there is nothing left to investigate. This is the power of law enforcement to lie to judges in affidav…
-
photoshop59 said: zeus423 said: Uh oh, I might have to change my mind now and side with the FBI. Washington Post, that liberal rag sides with the FBI. Cook's political correctness is simply a marketing ploy to make Apple appear m…
-
MagKaibigan said: Apple has the social responsibility to cooperate with the government on the safety of its citizenry. Surely they have the expertise to unlock one phone without creating a backdoor software, which can then be destroyed after …
-
vbmalone said: I always feel the people that are so concerned about the government seeing our personal data must have something to hide. When are people going to realize that using any type of electronic device or the internet to document yo…
-
creek0512 said: The FBI deliberately chose a high profile terrorism case to use in their fight to compel Apple to build them a less secure operating system that they will be able to hack so that they could win over the support of an ill-infor…
-
They're simply terrified over what will become the FIRST ruling in this area: that of Judge Orenstein on the Jun Feng case in Brooklyn where, Apple was going to cooperate and it was The Judge, that stepped in and asked for Apple's input as to why. R…
-
So an AG that doesn't understand legal rights such as Apple is asserting is NOT "aiding terorists"? Moron Oh and "Montgomery added that prosecutors have regularly secured warrants to unlock encrypted smartphones, "including iPhones sold prior to th…
-
prox said: msantti said: The iPhoe is quickly becoming the terrorists phon of choice. Tim Cook is going to see a ice little spike in sales. Terrorists now know that Apple has their back. Apple will continue to allow the Chinese …
-
bikeboatski said: Younger people weren't around much before the age of cell phones and can't realize that when landlines were the only option, the government really didn't spy on people to any large extent, and then not usually without good r…
-
holycow said: I don't see why Apple couldn't create a "backdoor" and give only Congress to control the "random key". This way the FBI can never abuse it, and mandates that whenever the FBI needs to break in, Congress would have to hold an i…
-
sog35 said: photoshop59 said: what do you think cook would say if there were an iPhone that had information on it regarding an armed terrorist attack on their headquarters? How would they know the phone had this information if t…
-
RickD0514 said: Since when does a company or person get to say "no" to the government just because they disagree with the request? Apparently Apple thinks they are above the law and that their business proposition is more valuable than other …
-
In the earlier Jun Feng case the judge (Ornstein) objected to the application of the All Writs Act of 1789 to smartphone government directed hacking all on his own and asked Apple to submit a brief. So there may be case farther along than San Bernar…