bought_it@aapl
About
- Username
- bought_it@aapl
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 41
Reactions
Comments
-
chris_ca wrote: » Keep in mind that the bond is posted in case it is overturned. If the injunction is upheld, Apple gets that money back so it's not costing them anything The procedural posture is not accurately stated. We have a cause of acti…
-
AppleInsider wrote: » Almost immediately after the company won an injunction against Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1, Apple posted the necessary $2.6 million bond to block sales of the iPad competitor in the U.S. Apple's posting of the bond means that …
-
Frankly, I will belabor the point: J. Posner has made trial court rulings that, if upheld on appeal, will set the precedent that parties to a Title 35 action may properly be denied a trial on the merits by a sua sponte determination by the court t…
-
The purpose of the bond is to make Samsung whole if it were to prevail on the merits of the underlying action for infringement. Put simply, all that Samsung could show the Court in potential lost profit from the Injunction was a pittance: $2.6 Meg.…
-
gatorguy wrote: » You might be mistaken in your understanding on the legality of a compulsory licensing order, even in the US. See United States vs. Besser Manufacturing, 1952. If that one doesn't suit you try United States vs. Microsoft, 2002. …
-
jerryswitched26 wrote: » He is one of the most respected jurists in the history of the world. You have no law degree, not even at the bottom of the class at the worst law school in the country. I'll believe Posner before you. Additionally…
-
jragosta wrote: » Yep. It's a scary decision. 1. Posner admitted infringement. 2. The patent's validity was not questioned. 3. Posner refused to even consider an injunction which is clearly allowed by law - even an injunction which gave Motorol…
-
greginprague wrote: » but the 110 years is a bit more than max 44 months Stanford's lawyers were asking after the conviction... That's true. I'd have been satisfied if the Judge gave him just 30 days - so long as they were spent in an energiz…
-
hill60 wrote: » ...meanwhile these guys will do their time and still be rich, strip their assets and leave them with nothing but the prison clothes they get released in. Don't ever release them. Trust me, the cost of incarcerating Madoff for t…
-
I am aware that there is an argument made that insider trading is nothing more than the normative scaling of free market knowledge. Those who can pay for their inside information are simply using a different form of "market research" that other inv…
-
jj.yuan wrote: » Just curious. Are there private companies who make more profit than Apple? Quite possible that there are private enterprises that make more profit than AAPL. Insofar as they are "private" then we will never know. Consi…
-
[
-
[URL=http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2012/06/judge-posner-no-damages-despite-infringement.html]Here is the full legal analysis of J. Posner's position.[/URL] Worth the read.
-
law talkin' guy wrote: » Huh? Apple v. Motorola (N.D.Ill. 11–cv-8540) (Order by Judge Posner, June 2012) The Order dismissing the case arose in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Any appeals taken from that trial …
-
jeffdm wrote: » I think this one is a bit too far outside of AI's mission. It doesn't really have anything directly to do with Apple. At least the previous political story here was about a campaign's use of Apple's iAd service, which was a firs…
-
melgross wrote: » Don't forget that this is already a Federal Appeals court. He does get overturned, but not very often. No. You are incorrect. This is the trial court action. J. Posner is a senior - status 7th Circuit (appellate court) Judg…
-
gatorguy wrote: » Wasn't Apple asking for a preliminary injunction while the case was being adjudicated? I could be mistaken, but I thought the granting of a permanent injunction required a Federal Court trial. If it was in fact a preliminary i…
-
gatorguy wrote: » Really? From just a quick search, as far back as at least 1997 (probably much longer than that) the general requirements for finding in favor of a preliminary injunction were these: The issuance of a preliminary injunction is …
-
Just what I'd expect from the father of the Law & Economics doctrine. To prevail in a patent infringement action one only need prove infringement. If infringement is proved by a preponderance of the evidence than an Injunction will lie to prec…
-
You are wrong about J. Posner being "just a circuit judge". In the US Federal Judicial System, District Court judges are the trial court judges. Circuit Court judges are the appellate courts and the only court higher than the Circuit Courts is the …