reefoid
About
- Username
- reefoid
- Joined
- Visits
- 31
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 38
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 158
Reactions
Comments
-
OK, more smoke and mirrors. Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil THEY DID. TWICE. And were ruled against each time. Seriously, take the hint. Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil When the words posted the second time were the words directly relevant to the legal ruling. Something you acknowledge. No, I'm ignoring it because the court had no right …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil And so Apple posted THE EXACT SAME WORDS AGAIN. So they were lies the first time but not the second? On what planet is a statement containing 360 words the EXACT same words…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Wovel Perhaps if Apple had previous statements on their web site indication Samsung infringed, you would have a point. Since you can't find Apple maki g such statements outside of the courts, this requir…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 It's only over when the fat lady sings... ...on Apple's UK website. Looks like the fat lady has sung.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 Which part of the difference between "I would propose" and "I hereby order", in a legal sense, do you not understand? A wishy washy ruling from an idiotic pack of fools. Whic…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tulkas If the court felt they were being disrespected (and perhaps they were) then they should have said so and explained how and why. Instead, all they said was that Apple was in breach because they posted…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tulkas In other words you completely made up the part about the ruling saying nothing more and nothing less. They were instructed what the notice had to included. These instructions said n…
-
Original statement is now gone from the Apple UK site. At least Apple have managed to comply with the court in that regard. 24 hours left to get the revised statement up, unless Tim fancies explaining himself to the court.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by FreeRange I didn't realize that people in the UK were that stupid, but now we know. Apple really should just tell these pretentious prats to fk off! The xenophobia in this thread is strong.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anantksundaram The Daily Mail reporter is pulling numbers out of his....... hat. He claims £6B in sales in the UK, but says that Apple's tax fine was £10M. Let's generously assume that there was n…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Wovel Do you really believe this is an important legal issue? Every legal issue is important whether you agree with it or not. If the judge let's Apple get away with this it makes the law an eve…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anantksundaram This whole thing is simply about Apple yanking the UK judges' chain. I love it. Apple will (and should) do what these silly people are asking -- in their own way.... Comin…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by protaginets I swear, there is something in the air that makes the English (and people who move to England) feel superior and smarter than everyoine else in the world. Anyone (non british) who reads about t…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gazoobee This is my major takeaway also. The real problem is the ridiculous order and I'm not sure why any sane judicial body wouldn't have vacated it when Apple appealed, although the UK courts are …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by t2af the solid evidence was in the goracle trail , showing the google made a massive UI change when Schmidt was on the board and saw the iphone. It was went from a blackberry clone to an iphone clone, there…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by renner.david.b Ditto, Can't imagine why Apple has not sued Schmit (aka S_h_it) for breach of contract. There has got to be terms in the Board of Directors agreements which prohibit the theft of company secr…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Does truth stop being truth when you go somewhere else? Why couldn't it be taken into account? If laws are different, yes. The recent UK ruling proved that. And there have been…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Hum de dum… legal precedents for future lawsuits worldwide… hum doo doo… You think a decision in an American court (that is still under appeal) can be used as a precedent in other c…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy I wouldn't go so far as to claim a mistrial order is clear. There's a high hurdle to cross, one which Samsung is unlikely to clear IMO. I agree with you there. Although if I was Mr Hogan, I'…