archer75
About
- Username
- archer75
- Joined
- Visits
- 1
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 204
Reactions
Comments
-
A 28" with an i7 would be nice. Though a 9800 GPU is just a 8800. They use the same core. I would hope for a Nvidia GT260 or 280. Then it would be a worthy upgrade for me all around. But what I really hope for is for power in the mini. Not an…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Outsider No way, they are too hot for the iMac form factor. I would bet they use the Lynnfield Nehalems in the iMac (in Q3-4 2009). Perhaps, but this article is about a new cooling module. Maybe that is what is need…
-
I would prefer to see the new core i7's in the new imacs.
-
I'd like to see these using the new Intel Core i7 processors.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Xian Zhu Xuande Only true to an extent when you compare very high-end computers. Certain common items like the processor are universal, of course, but even components like RAM tend to be much cheaper and less reliabl…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Crtaylor OH PUUH-LLEEEEASE! Dell computers are practically overated pieces of crap! Apple will beat them second to none! Macs are PC's. They use the same damn parts. You'd like to think you are getting something sp…
-
Keep in mind, apple doesn't own EFI. In addition to this device there are motherboards that use EFI and more coming out all the time. And nothing illegal about any of it.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by NasserAE You can rip your music to your personal computers and iPods but you cannot start selling iPods on ebay preloaded with music you ripped from you CDs without the proper permissions. You could if you include…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by emig647 I seriously doubt it would in every way. A) A sticker is not a label It wasn't labeled by apple C) Clearly what they mean is something totally different than placing a sticker on something. Any idiot in t…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by webhead It's the same with Phystar. It's illegal for them to SELL a computer with the Max OSX installed, they don't have the license to do that and Apple does not have to provide them with a special license to do so. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by NasserAE I think you've just won the case for Apple So you can't tweak and customize the OS you bought and installed? You can't install files and play in the system files for further customization? Once it's legall…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by NeoX360 No but they do have to modify OS X to get it to install on a non-mac before they sell it to you. They then include a full version in the package, but that Full version is not what they install. You cannot, fr…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by emig647 I know you're being partly serious, but there is no way that would work in court as an argument. It certainly would. That line is not specific and can mean any number of things. And seeing how EULA's have a …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mrsteveman1 So this is directed at not just you, but the others who keep insisting that EFI is the only difference here. There is copy protection, i'm surprised none of you have even mentioned it at all, and it is c…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by libran_ca Another important thing to note here is that Apple lawsuit claims that Psystar part of a larger plot. I think another "competing" company values MAC OSX as a significant technology and wants to get hold of it…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TenoBell This isn't entirely true. EULA has been upheld in court. There have been some court cases where EULA has not been upheld. But that was on a technicalities and differing opinions of fair use. These cases were n…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TenoBell Yes in the EULA Apple states that this is a license for a computer purchased from Apple. The EULA is a contract you agree to with the purchase of the software. Their is no law that gets you out of a contract y…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Mr. H The case has to do with copyright violation and the copy-protection circumvention in violation of the DMCA. There is no copy protection circumvention. Retail copies of OSX have no copy protection whatsoever.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Virgil-TB2 They are buying a box of software that is supposed to be used to upgrade only Apple computers and has a licence in the box that says can't be used for anything else. Then they are modifying that software (a…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Virgil-TB2 Sure everyone *else* sells OS's as a separate software product for whatever hardware you want to run it on, but that doesn't mean anyone can force Apple to do so. Not force apple to. But stop them from…