chipsy
About
- Username
- chipsy
- Joined
- Visits
- 1
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 287
Reactions
Comments
-
lostkiwi wrote: » I would like to respectfully disagree with this. Please show me a link to one software recovery company that been able to recover data from a password protected & locked iOS device from iOS 5 onwards - assuming your passwo…
-
thepixeldoc wrote: » *** In summary: absolutely NO DATA of any kind on any device, is safe from the Feds or law enforcement if they want it. None. Unfortunately this is true. Although this is a nice extra hurdle that's exactly only what it is…
-
Gotta love 2-step authentication. But I would like Apple to launch an authenticator app. It greatly increases the convenience of 2-step authentication. I don't get it, there are apps for everything yet this is still via SMS. Sure it's an adequate so…
-
stevesimpkin wrote: » That sounds like a lot to me (having never paid more than $40 for a watch myself) but I was surprised to find there is a whole community of people out there that are perfectly willing to pay a LOT of money for a "watch". An…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by copeland That would sound Apple like and I hope they do it that way. But I haven't found any report on how Apple will do. Will absolutely wait until I know how it works. How he explains is pretty much how all NFC…
-
"Google's failed rollout of Wallet for Android, including security problems associated with its wide open implementation of NFC" I think almost everyone knows that the reason why Google Wallet hasn't broken through is not because of security reason…
-
clemynx wrote: » My thought exactly. Amazing that all those companies that have been using NFC for years are now making smartwatches without NFC ! Once again, Apple will show them the way for something they should have thought about themselve…
-
thepixeldoc wrote: » A number of other posters on previous threads have mentioned the possibility of solar. I've tended towards thermal body energy... but can see both of these forward-thinking technologies being utilized in the same device by …
-
Euhm… I'm sorry but at 400 dollars it will not be competing with the high-end of the watch market. Not even close.
-
melgross wrote: » Well, at this point I'd like to see 2GB. Maybe we don't really need it for the phone, but I hope we'll see it for the iPad where battery life and heat aren't as important. I do work on my iPad that I wouldn't do on my iPhone, and…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by melgross Some things to consider. The first is that we don't know what the cost will be. That $16 is just a guess. What that guess is based upon, I don't know. But remember that both GT and Apple have stated that b…
-
I wonder, is it actually Apple's intention to aggregate all of your medical details, kind of like Microsoft's Healthvault works? Or is does it only have the intention of aggregating the collected information from sensors without all other medical da…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by sog35 according to this chinese site it says Bloomburg got it wrong. Apple is not banned. They just need to file paper work http://companies.caixin.com/2014-08-06/100713823.html quote below from the article (tr…
-
melgross wrote: » I don't know how much you play PC games, but most allow you turn turn down, or turn off most effects. Most pc's don't do well with much of this either. And apps aren't written with the most current iPad in mind, just like PC game…
-
melgross wrote: » The iPhone and iPad aren't connected with Thunderbolt. Apple uses the Lightning connector for that. Apple doesn t support the full USB proto call through iOS devices. You can't plug a standard USB stick in and send software down …
-
melgross wrote: » These are always proof of concept, until someone takes advantage of it. The problem is that there is no way to know if they are the first ones to discover this. And yes, a cable can't do it, only a device plugged in. But it…
-
digitalclips wrote: » LOL, yes along with Flash and USB those Android and Microsoft devices are gong to have oodles of fun! Apple has pretty well long since reduced the use of USB to the bare minimum when you stop and think. Even my printer is…
-
macky the macky wrote: » I have no idea if iDevices are exempt or not either. Let's hope the chip in the lightning cable disrupts the exploit. As I read the story, it appears the weakness is built into the UBS protocol which would be hard to prote…
-
[ macky the macky wrote: » iDevices are worthless because they don't have a UBS connector like android of Surface devices. Yeah... Although Lightning uses another connector which includes additions on top of usb it still uses USB 2.0 internally …
-
I can't really see any practical use for an always listening Shazam. Do we really need everything we hear identified?