pazuzu
About
- Username
- pazuzu
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 1,728
Reactions
Comments
-
suddenly newton wrote: » Too bad "hate Apple" not the reason they leave the forums. I love Apple but loathe fanbots.
-
malax wrote: » Have you even read what this suit is about? You seem to have it completely backwards in your urgency to complain about all things Apple. You're saying that Apple shouldn't have prevented content purchased from iTunes from workin…
-
SpamSandwich wrote: » We all know the answer is they did not. Speak for yourself. Let's hear what the court of anti-trust laws has to say.
-
freerange wrote: » Actually it's not your music, or Apple's. It belongs to the music companies, song writers and musicians. You are only granted a license to use it. Period. It was in fact the music companies that required the DRM, and there is ab…
-
pscooter63 wrote: » So why did you agree to them when you made your purchase? You had alternatives. You're just looking to blame someone else for your own ignorance. Obviously I'm not the only one - there's $1B worth of others. And what we…
-
pscooter63 wrote: » Bzzzzzzt. You paid for a LICENSE to consume that content. And you agreed to the terms of that license when you forked over your dough for it. Wake up, please. And those terms were unreasonable and monopolistic. Next? …
-
SpamSandwich wrote: » The law said otherwise. Bad law.
-
nasserae wrote: » The copyright law says it is NOT you content either. No - really? We're talking eContent being compatible on other eDevices. Quite a simple concept actually.
-
kozchris wrote: » I should sue the DVD industry for making me use a DVD player to play MY movies. I should be able to play my DVDs on an 8mm projector if I want to. They are my movies. Again you can play it on ANY DVD player not just a Sony. A…
-
ericthehalfbee wrote: » Slam dunk troll with another stupid comment. You want to complain, talk to the record labels or movie studios who are the ones deciding whether your content can be moved freely from device to device. adonissmu wrote: » T…
-
rogifan wrote: » What is this Business Insider? Talk about a click bait headline. It's in the NY times today too. Its all over the place.
-
Absolutely. There's no reason why I shouldn't be able to play my iTunes music or movies on any device I want I.e. Kindle Fire, Smart TV, etc because it's [B][I]my[/I][/B] music [I]not[/I] Apple's. Slam dunk case. I've been wanting this to go to tr…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by NolaMacGuy try going on a jog one day and you'll figure it out. I do all the time- shopping usually occurs after I jog. Not during.
-
Easy to understand- they cost much less and do relatively the same thing but also includes a keyboard and at no extra cost. A no-brainer.
-
solipsismy wrote: » Nope. Nope. Yup. Unless you ignorantly use it exclusively to just tell time.
-
solipsismy wrote: » Which further illustrates the point that ?Watch will not be replacing smartphones, tablets and traditional PCs. .....and cuts a chunk out of your sales pie right out the gate because it is totally tethered to the iPhone.
-
rogifan wrote: » One thing we know for sure is ?Watch is not a hobby. If Apple's ?Watch section on their website is anything to go by I think the marketing for this is going to be impressive and massive. Most definitely a hobby just like ?TV. D…
-
nolamacguy wrote: » how ignorant. i dont wear a watch. but am planning on getting AW. why? activity tracking during my day; and wireless music & payments while jogging -- without my heavy, valuable phone on me (GPS is not required for run trac…
-
solipsismy wrote: » I don't see how it could be the successor to the iPhone in the same way the iPhone isn't the successor to the iMac. They are very, very different tools. And the iPhone isn't dependent on a Mac. That's not trolling- that's a …
-
10%- that's a hard sell. It better work seamlessly- flawlessly. And not be dependent on the iPhone.