awilliams87
About
- Username
- awilliams87
- Joined
- Visits
- 17
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 122
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 264
Reactions
Comments
-
jetpilot said: supadav03 said: Pretty sure you can still used wired headphones even without the headphone jack. So missing your point? It's called lightning connected (not wireless) headphones Yes because Lightning headphones are…
-
Soli said: awilliams87 said: Adding the word architecture changes nothing. The ISA license only includes specification to ARM ISA... If you believe that the architecture "changes nothing" then you need to ask yourself why the initia…
-
Soli said: awilliams87 said: "Apple takes ARM's chip knowhow and heavily customizes it to build its own unique A-series processors" Apple doesn't use ARM reference designs; The A-series aren't "heavily customized" processors based o…
-
"Apple takes ARM's chip knowhow and heavily customizes it to build its own unique A-series processors" Apple doesn't use ARM reference designs; The A-series aren't "heavily customized" processors based on "ARM's chip[s]." They're Apple's own des…
-
tallest skil said: By including a pair of regular EarPods with an adapter, Apple would offer the option of using its included headphones with iPhone and other audio sources. The strategy might also result in cost savings, as it does not requi…
-
levi said: awilliams87 said: $3 billion? Still view this as a ridiculous acquisition. Assuming all 13 million subscribers pay $10/month Apple Music (built on the Beats platform) is generating $1.6B in revenue annually - which alone …
-
$3 billion? Still view this as a ridiculous acquisition.
-
sog35 said: awilliams87 said: Your figures don't indicate that they don't care about privacy. Yes it does. 80-90% of iOS users use Facebook and Google services. Everyone who has half a brain knows your privacy is getting violate…
-
sog35 said: Apple needs to rely less on China for revenue. How? Services. Period. Facebook and Google only do advertising and they are worth $800 billion combined. Tim Cook has to get of his high horse on privacy and start building an Appl…
-
avidthinker said: the thorough disrespect for IP and property rights in general will come back and bite the communists in the ass one day. i am assured of this, maybe not today or tomorrow, but the day of reckoning is coming. Why would it…
-
Our main man Daniel is back at full force!
-
Finally. A DED editorial.
-
auxio said: awilliams87 said: The crux of your argument is that Google is "forcing" manufacturers to use its app. You've failed to show how they're doing so. Your only argument is that it's hard to sell phones without Android. Yet, i…
-
auxio said: awilliams87 said: Where in your example does Google "force" you to use Android? Where in your example are you talking about the real world where companies can be competitive without it? The crux of your argument is …
-
auxio said: cnocbui said: How do Google force manufacturers to put Android on their phones? Do they force Apple to put Android on iPhones? So if I start up a small handset manufacturing company, tell me what my real world option…
-
auxio said: awilliams87 said: Give one example of a monopoly which was "easy to create" without utilizing State power to enforce it. Microsoft in the PC industry circa 1998. Tell me who was competing with them at that time? 1)…
-
auxio said: awilliams87 said: "Lawmakers" don't determine what's good for the marketplace. Customers and their money do. "Lawmakers" simply superimpose their own restrictions, whether they're good for the marketplace or not. I'm …
-
wood1208 said: Android is suppose to be open sourced and Google must not have power to require phone manufacturers to load Google crap apps as default and cannot be deleted. Apple, on other hand is not open source or claim as such.But, about …
-
auxio said: awilliams87 said: Google doesn't 'impose" any policy on any manufacturer. They're license agreements. The manufacturers can choose not to use, alter and ship Android if they please. I understand that there is a choice…
-
9secondkox2 said: OEMs don't PAY to use Android. The bundled apps are the payment. Its simply a different model. Amazing how how governments can't use their brains. Reminds me of Apples ebook strategy that all of a sudden became illegal…