ws11
About
- Username
- ws11
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 159
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SolipsismX My or is unfounded. I don't recall reading that big.Little was advancing to allow all cores to run at once. Thanks. This is how it was supposed to be from the start. The reason the Exynos 5410 could not…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SolipsismX Is it actually 8-core or is it big.LITTLE? It's the Exynos 5422, another big.LITTLE design, but unlike previous designs, this can use all 8 cores at once. Specs: 4x Cortex A15 @ 2.1GHz 4x Cortex A7 …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by iMember Samsung Galaxy S5 comes in two version Snapdragon 801 2.5 GHz and Octa-core 2.1 GHz, so it looks like is not gonna be any S5 Pro or S5 Prime so this is pretty much what you gonna get from Samsung flagship pho…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by gwmac Isn't it the same size as the S4? I thought they kept the dimensions of the actual phone the same even though the display was slightly larger. In fact It is about the same size as the S3 isn't it? Galaxy S5 (…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by PaulMJohnson I'm pretty shocked they didn't cobble together a 64-bit processor (or is this one?) Seems like the sort of thing they would blatantly copy after banging on about how pointless it is if Apple do it. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by bradipao Very bad specs if confirmed: basically same perf of N5, six months later for double price. The Snapdragon 801 (MSM8974AC) is more powerful than the Snapdragon 800 (MSM8974). Max CPU frequency: 2.26GHz --&…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by wakefinance It's very nice to see Samsung avoiding new software gimmicks. Everything they added this year appears to be useful. I don't care too much for features like the finger print scanner or heart rate monitor…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ClemyNX No way???!!!! See where I'm from? I meant that they didn't cut one centimeter from the watch, but one millimeter. If them removing one centimeter from a watch that barely measures one and a half doesn…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ClemyNX You mean 1 mm. No. 10 mm = 1 cm = ~0.39 inches 1 mm = 0.1 cm = ~0.039 inches
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton The market is bigger than this website. That's something techies never understand: tech doesn't revolve around them. Which is why I said: "I don't think I've ever seen a single advert that makes r…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton I'm referring to posts in this thread that brag about "Bay Trail-T". In your previous post you made reference to the "average iPad consumer", a group that wouldn't even know this website exists.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by NoTown Why aren't there any pictures from the side? /s According to the press release, they're 10.0 mm (~0.39 inches) thick. I just can't stand the look of these things. Only analogue watches for me!
-
Quote: Originally Posted by iMember Try harder? you pointed out that some of the Samsung hardware are good and i pointed out that some are not, but also you literally the only one who goes to store to buy a SSD storage and ask for a Samsung SSD …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by iMember No their not buy an 100$ Shamesung non-smartphone featuring Samsung processor and you prove my point here a list top processors Intel Apple Ax Qualcom Nvidia AMD more.. shitty company shitty company Samsung …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by alcstarheel As a name I personally prefer Scamsung. And not Scamscum? Truth be told, some of their hardware is actually pretty good, such as their 840 Pro SSD. I'm not particularly a fan of their phones or ta…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesMac any laptop at $250 is not going to run Windows 8 very well. A laptop using the weakest Intel hardware from late 2013 ~ early 2014 should handle Windows 8 just fine. Of course the potential problem for Mi…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton "Blah blah blah Bay Trail-T blah blah blah" The average iPad customer just wants a great user experience. Once you start slinging the Intel code names, you've already lost the competition for the co…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Smallwheels When I read this story I first thought that Microsux was finally willing to compete by getting off of its high horse. Then I read it was only for the lower priced machines. The lowest priced tablet w…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by danielsutton "...In addition, these sub-$250 products do not have to be touch enabled." Does this mean that Microsoft intends to have Windows installed on sub-$250 traditional PC hardware? Being that mobile devices…